I am starting on a project that works with a team using Scala. I might
be interested.
Michael Leo
Kettle River Consulting
ML...@KettleRiverConsulting.com
+1 612-859-2108 (cell)
+1 612-605-1978 (fax)
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Groovy Users of Minnesota" group.
>
> To post to this group, send email to groo...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to groovymn-u...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/groovymn?hl=en
I like the idea of the general group focused around functional languages. I'm sort of torn between looking at Clojure and Scala at the moment (probably leaning towards Clojure due some recent press coming from the Scala camp). It might be nice to have a broader appeal to a couple of languages targeting the JVM runtime.
Regards,
-- chris --
I know there's already a Clojure group that's meeting at the Refactr offices. I'm not sure if there's any interest in the meetings becoming more of a JVM functional meeting, I think the clojure group is pretty small, but I'm not sure if they're interested in expanding their focus. Could be worth asking, especially as the Akka stuff could still be leveraged from Clojure (or other JVM languages) if desired.
-Ted
I was referring to David Pollack's words on Scala...
http://goodstuff.im/yes-virginia-scala-is-hard
http://www.infoq.com/articles/barriers-to-scala-adoption
David's been around the block some. I first encountered him and his company, Athena Design, in the early 90s on OS/2 Warp. Dude knows what he's talking about and I have a lot of respect for him.
Regards,
-- chris --
Christopher Bartling
chris.b...@gmail.com