Rspec style

[aca...@gmail.com]

Anybody have strong preferences about rspec style? I'm using minitest at work, so I don't. I started writing some tests for secrets yesterday and looked at other tests for examples and the styles were quite a bit different from one file to another. I'm happy to follow whatever style we agree on but I'd like someone to suggest one.

Sent from my iPhone

[Ian Young]

In general I would say we should aim for the style used in the RSpec docs, like here and here. So `describe`/`it`, and `expect(...).to`. Is that specific enough? I'm gonna care more that the tests are present, robust, and readable than about the exact coding style.

 

That said, I think most of the test syntax got updated when I moved to RSpec v3, but if there are any tests still using the deprecated `should` syntax, we should upgrade those.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

"GrinnellPlans Development" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

email to grinnellplans-deve...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to

grinnellplan...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at

http://groups.google.com/group/grinnellplans-development.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.