'Reluctant at first, Trump officials intervened in South Asia as nuclear fears grew': A Very Significant Account
Sukla Sen
Reluctant at first, Trump officials intervened in South Asia as nuclear fears grew
WASHINGTON – As a conflict between India and Pakistan escalated, US Vice-President J.D. Vance told Fox News on May 8 that it was “fundamentally none of our business”. The United States could counsel both sides to back away, he suggested, but this was not America’s fight.
Yet within 24 hours, Mr Vance and Mr Marco Rubio, in his first week in the dual role of national security adviser and secretary of state, found themselves plunged into the details.
The reason was the same one that has driven every president since Mr Bill Clinton to deal with another major conflict between the two longtime enemies in 1999: fear that it might quickly go nuclear.
What drove Mr Vance and Mr Rubio into action was evidence that the Pakistani and Indian air forces had begun to engage in serious dogfights, and that Pakistan had sent 300 to 400 drones into Indian territory to probe its air defences.
But the most significant causes for concern came late on May 9, when explosions hit the Noor Khan air base in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, the garrison city adjacent to Islamabad.
The base is a key installation, one of the central transport hubs for Pakistan’s military and the home of the air refuelling capability that would keep Pakistani fighters aloft.
But it is also just a short distance from the headquarters of Pakistan’s Strategic Plans Division, which oversees and protects the country’s nuclear arsenal, now believed to include about 170 or more warheads. The warheads themselves are presumed to be spread around the country.
The intense fighting broke out between India and Pakistan after 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, were killed in a terrorist attack on April 22 in Kashmir, a border region claimed by both nations. On May 10 morning, President Donald Trump announced that the two countries had agreed to a ceasefire.
One former US official long familiar with Pakistan’s nuclear program noted on May 10 that Pakistan’s deepest fear is of its nuclear command authority being decapitated. The missile strike on Noor Khan could have been interpreted, the former official said, as a warning that India could do just that.
It is unclear whether there was US intelligence pointing to a rapid, and perhaps nuclear, escalation of the conflict.
At least in public, the only piece of obvious nuclear signalling came from Pakistan. Local media reported that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had summoned a meeting of the National Command Authority – the small group that makes decisions about how and when to make use of nuclear weapons.
Established in 2000, the body is nominally chaired by the prime minister and includes senior civilian ministers and military chiefs. In reality, the driving force behind the group is the army chief, General Syed Asim Munir.
But Pakistan’s defence minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif denied that the group ever met. Speaking on Pakistani television on May 10 before the ceasefire was announced, he acknowledged the existence of the nuclear option but said: “We should treat it as a very distant possibility; we shouldn’t even discuss it.”
It was being discussed at the Pentagon, and by May 9 morning, the White House had clearly made the determination that a few public statements and some calls to officials in Islamabad and Delhi were not sufficient. Interventions by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates had little effect.
According to one person familiar with the unfolding events who was not authorised to speak publicly about them, after Mr Vance suggested that the foreign conflict was not America’s problem, serious concerns developed in the administration that the conflict was at risk of spiralling out of control.
The pace of strikes and counterstrikes was picking up. While India had initially focused on what it called “known terror camps” linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant group blamed for the April attack, it was now targeting Pakistani military bases.
The Trump administration was also concerned that messages to deescalate were not reaching top officials on either side.
So US officials decided that Mr Vance, who had returned a couple of weeks earlier from a trip to India with his wife Usha, whose parents are Indian immigrants, should call Prime Minister Narendra Modi directly. His message was that the United States had assessed there was a high probability of a dramatic escalation of violence that could tip into full-scale war.
By the US account, Mr Vance pressed Mr Modi to consider alternatives to continued strikes, including a potential off-ramp that US officials thought would prove acceptable to the Pakistanis. Mr Modi listened, but did not commit to any of the ideas.
Mr Rubio, according to the State Department, talked with Gen Munir, a conversation made easier by his new role as national security adviser. Over the past quarter-century, the White House has often served, if quietly, as a direct channel to the Pakistani army, the country’s most powerful institution.
Mr Rubio also called Pakistan’s foreign minister Ishaq Dar, and India’s nationalistic external affairs minister S. Jaishankar, whom he had met on Jan 22 in Washington.
A senior Pakistani intelligence official, who was not authorised to comment publicly about the negotiations, credited the involvement of the Americans over the past 48 hours – and in particular, Mr Rubio’s intervention – for sealing the accord. But as of May 10 night, there were reports that cross-border firing was continuing.
Mr Sharif, the prime minister, made a point of focusing on the US president’s role. “We thank President Trump for his leadership and proactive role for peace in the region,” he wrote on social media. “Pakistan appreciates the United States for facilitating this outcome, which we have accepted in the interest of regional peace and stability.”
India, in contrast, said the United States had not been involved.
It is far from clear that the ceasefire will hold, or that the damage done may not trigger more retribution. Pakistan brought down five Indian planes, by some accounts.
Pakistani intelligence, the senior official said, assessed that India was trying to bait Islamabad into going beyond a defensive response. India wanted Pakistan to use its own F-16 fighter jets in a retaliatory attack so they could try to shoot one down, the official said.
Those were sold by the United States because Pakistan is still officially considered a “major non-Nato ally,” a status then President George W. Bush bestowed on the country in the months after the 9/11 attacks.
The senior Pakistani intelligence officer said US intervention was needed to pull the two sides back from the brink of war.
“The last move came from the president,” the official said. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Sukla Sen
Press Conference of Kapil Sibal today (12 May 2025 08:30 PM).==========I have a great deal of respect for Kapil Sibal Sahab's relentless efforts in favor of sanity in India. However, I beg to categorically differ from his assertions in favor of solving all problems by "bilateral talks only." That is the language of the imperialists who know that they are strong militarily and materially to confront and defeat the other (weaker) party in a bilateral confrontation. A civilized and fair way of resolving irreconcilable differences is to solve them with adjudication, mediation, or arbitration rather than by beating each other up.Would these protagonists of the bilateral way of solving all problems suggest the same about solving problems against a stronger party like China? Nehru jee tried that in 1962, shortening his life span.Jaishankar Bhai was wiser when he pointed out that China has a bigger economy. But he did not say anything about taking the issue to the International Court. I believe he could not have done the same without opening the door for resolving the Kashmir issue as well, with the help of ICJ. I therefore see solving the Kashmir problem with Trump's mediation as a blessing in disguise, despite the craziness and selfishness of Trump. Despite the chance that Kashmir may become Trump's Rivera -- that would be good for Trump and Kashmiris, despite the shagrin of Hindutwa brigades. But Kashmir may become a new military base too, to the detriment of all in and around that region. At the same time, if other countries around Kashmir maintain a saner attitude towards Kashmir, there would be no justification or necessity for Kashmir to surrender its sovereignty to the USA.Now, if and when the Kashmir issue is solved with the help of the USA, India will be able to go to an international body for resolving its issues with China, one way or the other, without firing bullets or bombs. If China does not agree to resolve the border issues with the help of adjudication, mediation or arbitration, its reputation will go down in the world community. Some day in the future, it will have to listen to saner and fairer voices.-Satinath=======
--
Socialist Party (India)
Website: spi.org.in.
Facebook: facebook.com/socialistpartyindia
Twitter: twitter.com/spiinfo
Email: socialist...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Socialist Party (India)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to socialist-party-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/socialist-party-india/CACEsOZhS-Wua0Da2oO%2BiF_WoT1OzF3%3DdFZ8FHk%2BRM%2BnSVXS8PQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Sukla Sen
Dear Sukla jee,Thanks for your response.You said: << I, for one, am not too sure that Trump can really do anything meaningful to untangle the Kashmir knot. >>However, I think Trump can make Modi's unruly rule difficult by taking steps against Adani. Further, Trump can arm Pakistan to the teeth (together with China), making Pakistan more hostile against India, embarrassing Modi.Big powers like China (and therefore, Russia) are already against India. Modi cannot afford to push the USA (and hence Israel) against India, too. Uncle Sam is Modi's only uncle, aside from Israel. Modi cannot afford to push Uncle Sam towards Pakistan.-Satinath=======