Make no mistake.
It's an attempted mega-assault on the "India" that was brought into being by the epic Indian freedom struggle on August 15 1947, the day when the shackle of foreign colonial rule was finally shaken off.
Arguably, the most major as yet.
Universal adult franchise, along with "free" elections -- every five years or so, is one of the very cornerstones of the Indian political system -- its much vaunted, even if flawed, electoral "democracy".
The SIR, an unprecedented move any whichever way, is structured to disenfranchise millions and millions -- the marginalised (and targeted) ones in particular by making near-impossible demands in terms of documents submission and that too within an absurdly tight time schedule.
On top of this, those who will be disenfranchised via this summary exercise will also face the nightmarish prospect of losing citizenship as well. Even if that process will presumably be a bit cumbersome.
All in all, if this already unleashed process -- which in due course is slated to be extended to whole of India -- goes unabated, will radically change "India", as it stood till now.
<<The petitions listed for hearing, and challenging the SIR, include ones by Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, Congress leader K.C. Venugopal, Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha, activists Yogendra Yadav, Arshad Ajmal, NGOs Association for Democratic Reforms and People’s Union for Civil Liberties. The court has also listed a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay supporting the SIR.
The petitions have argued that an interim order from the apex court staying the June 24 notification announcing the SIR was necessary as crores of voters, drawn from the poor and marginalised sections of the society, were put on a tight leash to produce documents to prove their domicile or face the prospect of disenfranchisement.>>
Here's the "synopsis" of the ADR petition -- most likely the first and, maybe, the most significant one:
SYNOPSIS
The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 32 of the
Constitution of India seeking setting aside of Order and
communication dated 24.06.2025 issued by the Respondent
Election Commission of India (ECI) directing for Special Intensive
Revision of Electoral Rolls in Bihar (SIR Order) as being in violation
of Articles 14, 19, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution of India as
well as provisions of Representation of People’s Act, 1950 and Rule
21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The SIR order dated
24.06.2025 if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process
disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives,
thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the
country, which are part of basic structure of the Constitution. That
the documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due
process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said
Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Roll in Bihar further make
this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of
genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their
disenfranchisement.
That the order dated 24.06.2025 issued by ECI has shifted the onus
of being on the voters’ list from the State to citizens. It has excluded
identification documents such as Aadhar or ration cards which
further make marginalised communities and the poor more
vulnerable to exclusion from voting. The Declaration as required
under the SIR process is violative of Article 326 in so far as it
requires a voter to provide documents to prove his/her citizenship
and also citizenships of his/her mother or father, failing which
his/her name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can
be deleted from the same.
That ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to
conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state elections which
are due in November 2025. There are lakhs of citizens (whose
names did not appear in 2003 ER) who do not possess the
documents as required under the SIR order, there are many who
may be able to procure the documents but the short timeline
mentioned in directive may preclude them from being able to supply
the same within the time period.
Bihar is a state with high poverty and migration rates where many
lack access to documents like birth certificates or parental records.
As per estimates over 3 crore voters and more particularly from
marginalized communities (such as SC, STs and migrant workers)
could be excluded from voting due to the stringent requirements as
mentioned in the SIR order. That the current reports from Bihar,
where SIR is already underway, show that lakhs of voters from
villages and marginalized communities do not possess the
documents as being sought for them.
Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (RPA,
1950 allows the ECI to direct a special revision of electoral rolls "for
reasons to be recorded." The ECI's directive lacks recorded reasons
supported by any evidence or transparent methodology, rendering
it arbitrary and thus liable to be struck down. The requirement of
citizenship documents contravenes the requirement of specific
grounds for deletion of names from electoral rolls (e.g., death, non-
residence, or disqualification under Section 16 of RPA, 1950).
Since 2003, five general elections and five assembly elections have
taken place in Bihar with continuous addition and deletion of
names in Bihar’s electoral roll. While SIR of Bihar or any other state
of country is a positive step, but the manner in which ECI has
directed the conduct of SIR in a poll bound state like Bihar, has
raised questions from all stakeholders, particularly the voters.
Moreover, Special Summary Revision (SSR) was already conducted
between October 29, 2024 and January 6, 2025 which addressed
issues such as migration and ineligible voters due to death or other
reasons. Thus, there is no reason for such a drastic exercise in a
poll bound state in such a short period of time, violating right to
vote of lakhs of voters.
Therefore, order and communication dated 24.06.2025 for Special
Intensive Revision of Electoral Roll in Bihar as issued by the ECI is
liable to be struck down.
Hence the instant Writ Petition.