Noam Chomsky in the still unfolding sordid Epstein saga

[Sukla Sen]

AA. Jeffrey Epstein was running a huge enterprise of horrific criminality. This criminality was not a by-product, but the "product" itself. He was in the business of catering to, and also enhancing, certain bestial urges in the powerful and wealthy "men" in America, and also the wider world. A large number of women -- a vast segment of them actually kids -- were victimised. Tortured, apart from being sexually abused, and a few(?) were, as it looks, even killed.

BB. Chomsky, as has come to light in the process of the release of Epstein's papers in instalments, was quite pally with him.

CC. The fact of being pally with such a horrific criminal -- that too on the part of a crusader for ethicality in public life -- can conceivably be defended only on the ground of "ignorance".

DD The wife and spokesperson of Chomsky has now tried to do just that: 'In a statement on Saturday, his wife and spokesperson, Valéria Chomsky, said that "Epstein created a manipulative narrative about his case, which Noam, in good faith, believed in"." (Ref.: <https://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/noam-chomskys-wife-responds-to-epstein-controversy/>.)

(Also relevant for the background details: <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce9ykjlyv50o>.).

EE. That's how things stand for now.

Two key extracts:

I/II.

“…we were careless in not thoroughly researching his background. This was a grave mistake, and for that lapse in judgment, I apologize on behalf of both of us.”

“…Noam’s initial public response to inquiries about Epstein failed to adequately acknowledge the gravity of Epstein’s crimes and the enduring pain of his victims… a firm and explicit stance on such matters is always required.” 

No ifs, no buts.

Even if somewhat delayed, a welcome apology.

II. 

“…It was deeply disturbing for both of us to realize we had engaged with someone who presented as a helpful friend but led a hidden life of criminal, inhumane, and perverted acts.”

“…Since the revelation of the extent of his crimes, we have been shocked.”

Recantation and pleading of ignorance.

___

The issue still remains whether the god has feet of clay (together with a head of gold).

Peace Is Doable