grease monkey has support for firefox.......why not convert it to a chrome extenstion?
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Tariq Ghrayyib
Feb 11, 2010, 6:58:30 PM2/11/10
to greasemonkey-users
well im using google chrome beta. and ive installed some "extensions"
that are basically the same idea as addons for firefox. obviously the
speed is faster than firefox. and webpages actually appear the way
they are supposed to. ive used firefox for about 3 years. it would be
nice if the best addon i used on firefox would become an extension on
googles chrome browser. start now before the actually OS comes out?
kinda just an idea on my end.
that are basically the same idea as addons for firefox. obviously the
speed is faster than firefox. and webpages actually appear the way
they are supposed to. ive used firefox for about 3 years. it would be
nice if the best addon i used on firefox would become an extension on
googles chrome browser. start now before the actually OS comes out?
kinda just an idea on my end.
cc
Feb 11, 2010, 7:54:24 PM2/11/10
to greasemon...@googlegroups.com
You might try installing a userscript into Chrome natively before asking
about Greasemonkey's plans for porting -- IIRC, Chromium has had (basic,
partial) support for userscripts for some months now, though it lacks
the GM_ APIs.
I neither have nor desire Chrome, though, so YMMV.
about Greasemonkey's plans for porting -- IIRC, Chromium has had (basic,
partial) support for userscripts for some months now, though it lacks
the GM_ APIs.
I neither have nor desire Chrome, though, so YMMV.
--
cc | pseudonymous |<http://carlclark.mp/>
--
‖ Better to understand a little than to misunderstand a lot. ‖
http://tagzilla.mozdev.org v0.066
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages