Greasemonkey 0.8.3 RC1

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Anthony Lieuallen

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:07:28 AM11/23/09
to greasemon...@googlegroups.com, greasemo...@googlegroups.com
I have just baked up the first release candidate for Greasemonkey 0.8.3.
Most notably, the Firefox 3.6 compatibility flag has been included.

It can be found here:
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/greasemonkey/greasemonkey/greasemonkey-0.8.20091123.3.xpi
( http://bit.ly/7GBiMS )

Full list of changes:
* Add Firefox 3.6 compatibility flag.
* Use platform-dependent line endings when creating a script file.
(#1004)
* Properly handle error events, and calling the onerror callback,
in GM_xmlhttpRequest. (#1008)
* Add 'binary' option, to do a .sendAsBinary(), for
GM_xmlhttpRequest. (#1017)
* GM_setValue() will display a descriptive error, when it does not
receive enough arguments. (#1005)
* Fixed a bug that would cause the Greasemonkey info bar not to
appear sometimes, when viewing a script's source.

ML

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:49:35 PM11/25/09
to greasemonkey-users
Is the flag for 3.6.*? I'm using a 3.6b4 candidate build and it tells
me the extension is unsupported :(

On Nov 23, 11:07 am, Anthony Lieuallen <arant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have just baked up the first release candidate for Greasemonkey 0.8.3.
>   Most notably, the Firefox 3.6 compatibility flag has been included.
>
> It can be found here:http://cloud.github.com/downloads/greasemonkey/greasemonkey/greasemon...
> (http://bit.ly/7GBiMS)
Message has been deleted

.

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 4:59:24 AM11/26/09
to greasemonkey-users
Does not work with my 3.6 beta3.

It says that it's not compatible.

mad

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 6:44:20 AM11/26/09
to greasemonkey-users
I changed manually some code from install.rdf add finally ti
played ...

<!-- Firefox -->
<em:targetApplication>
<Description>
<em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id>
<em:minVersion>1.5</em:minVersion>
<em:maxVersion>3.6.*</em:maxVersion> <!-- this one was 3.5.* --
>
</Description>
</em:targetApplication>

Sure it's not the best solution as it may crach... due to
incompatibility... but can't live without it ;)

Kwah

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:19:09 AM11/26/09
to greasemon...@googlegroups.com
You can use the Nightly Tester Tools addon [1] to override the compatibility check. A quick google search turned up some instructions how to use [2][3].


[1] - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6543
[2] - http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/25/three-methods-to-force-add-on-compatibility-in-firefox/
[3] - http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/how-to-make-any-firefox-add-on-compatible-with-all-versions/


2009/11/26 mad <mando...@gmail.com>
--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to greasemon...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to greasemonkey-us...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.



ML

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:20:47 AM11/26/09
to greasemonkey-users
I think just the XPI linked in the original post had something odd
with it, building from the master on github installs no problem in my
3.6b4 candidate build. :)

On Nov 26, 9:19 am, Kwah <kwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can use the Nightly Tester Tools addon [1] to override the compatibility
> check. A quick google search turned up some instructions how to use [2][3].
>
> [1] -https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6543
> [2] -http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/25/three-methods-to-force-add-on-compat...
> [3] -http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/how-to-make-any-firefox-add-on-compatibl...
>
> 2009/11/26 mad <mando7s...@gmail.com>
>
> > I changed manually some code from install.rdf add finally ti
> > played ...
>
> > <!-- Firefox -->
> >    <em:targetApplication>
> >      <Description>
> >        <em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id>
> >        <em:minVersion>1.5</em:minVersion>
> >        <em:maxVersion>3.6.*</em:maxVersion> <!-- this one was 3.5.* --
>
> >      </Description>
> >    </em:targetApplication>
>
> > Sure it's not the best solution as it may crach... due to
> > incompatibility... but can't live without it ;)
>
> > On Nov 26, 11:59 am, "." <ratlogist...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Does not work with my 3.6 beta3.
>
> > > It says that it's not compatible.
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "greasemonkey-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to greasemon...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > greasemonkey-us...@googlegroups.com<greasemonkey-users%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
> > .

Anthony Lieuallen

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 8:34:05 AM11/29/09
to greasemon...@googlegroups.com
On Nov 23, 11:07 am, Anthony Lieuallen <arant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have just baked up the first release candidate for Greasemonkey 0.8.3...

As pointed out, I borked up this build somehow, I was looking at the
wrong point in the source tree. Here's the second release candidate.

http://bit.ly/4z9TwK

YopGM

unread,
Dec 1, 2009, 9:11:17 AM12/1/09
to greasemonkey-users
Anthony,
thanks for sharing it.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages