I dunno Carlene, that all seems rather tenuous to me. I'd be hesistant to
make conclusions on a "slip" that could almost as easily be a typo.
Sam
PS. I did find it interesting how many of the sub7 crew-bies claimed to be
dyslexic... *chuckle*
In this post he made in another grc forum, he signed it differently.
I suspect this may have been an oversight on his part, not the
dyslexia. Might be worth adding to the things we search for in
the engines, while attempting to improve our evidence that BEdWetTeRzZ
& cO are likely the paid consultants of Michal Paris.
Here's the link...
http://grc.com/x/talk.exe?cmd=article&group=grc.spyware&item=4261&utag=
Sam Schinke wrote:
> "Carlene" wrote ...
>> Also, notice how he capitalized the "D". That's not dyslexia!
>> Furthermore, if that alias he "accidently" typed in his adolecent
>> furvor, is indeed another pseudo alias that he "goes by" in Skwipt
>> Kwiddie land, then there's also a distinct possibility that we
>> now have his real first name. Just use the first three characters
>> of the accidently typed alias. See the relationship with a common
>> name? Aliases are OFTEN derived from the real thing.
>> How about that "DAN"? Let's see a flurry of denials please. They
>> won't mean POOP. The cat's out of the bag!
>> Just something to keep in mind when cross referencing web finds.
> I dunno Carlene, that all seems rather tenuous to me.
> I'd be hesistant to make conclusions on a "slip" that
> could almost as easily be a typo.
I think you missed this:
>> Just something to keep in mind when cross referencing web finds.
As an additional item to search, perhaps to dredge up something that
has meaning, it's excellent work.
> Sam
was-salaam,
abujamal
--
PCHelpers: Putting the "Personal" into "Personal Computers"
and closing the door on the tyranny of ignorance.
PCHelpers International: http://www.pchelpers.org/
news://news.pchelponline.org mailto:pche...@pchelpers.org
I'm afraid not, Carlene...
----------------------------------------------------------------
From: "dafunks" <daf...@evil.co.uk>
Subject: Re: So the evidence has been put forward... which is it?
Message-ID: <GrmMlK2y...@colossus.SMG>
Xref: colossus.SMG grc.ten-forward.pchelp:1921
"Wayne / DiamondCS" <wa...@diamondcs.com.au> wrote:
>[...] I can't think of any other reasons why they [...] hide behind
> anonymous names and anonymous email addresses,[...]
Dafunks = Danuk Peterson.
dafunks = My name i have used online for the past 5/6 years.
daf...@evil.co.uk = My current email address that i use for
conrispondance.
It is not a fraudulant email. And dafunks isnt a name i hide behind.
Its the name i am recognised by. [...]
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
Milly
> > I dunno Carlene, that all seems rather tenuous to me.
> > I'd be hesistant to make conclusions on a "slip" that
> > could almost as easily be a typo.
>
> I think you missed this:
>
> >> Just something to keep in mind when cross referencing web finds.
No, I didn't. What I was addressing was the "challenge" put forth by
Carlene. It seemed to be an extension of her flame-wars with dafunks.
> As an additional item to search, perhaps to dredge up something that
> has meaning, it's excellent work.
Also note the additional confirmation by Milly, further down the thread. I
think _that_ willing revelation is more conclusive than a single (possibly
erroneous) signage of a post. (I do recall reading that post by dafunks, but
at the time I wasn't trying to keep any "forensics".. *lol*)
Sam
Salaam!
Sam Schinke wrote:
> What I was addressing was the "challenge" put forth by Carlene.
> It seemed to be an extension of her flame-wars with dafunks.
I'm glad you put "challenge" in quotation marks.
> Also note the additional confirmation by Milly, further down the
> thread. I think _that_ willing revelation is more conclusive
> than a single (possibly erroneous) signage of a post. (I do
> recall reading that post by dafunks, but at the time I wasn't
> trying to keep any "forensics".. *lol*)
I think he's a diversion. Where's Hellfirez? Not that I care ...
6254 emails from that quarter. They've slowed down to a trickle.
Ray Jones was bragging about getting 12,000 an hour for hours on end
- -- I don't even get bragging privileges with this puny amateur hour
joke. Oh, well.
> Sam
was-salaam,
abujamal
- --
PCHelpers: Putting the "Personal" into "Personal Computers"
and closing the door on the tyranny of ignorance.
PCHelpers International: http://www.pchelpers.org/
news://news.pchelponline.org mailto:pche...@pchelpers.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
Comment: Unpublished key by intent of signer
iQEVAwUBOueq2dbWRcYTlnfrAQNF7Qf+Oji2ZFCYBx0qJnrkuenZX8ReGKh/7Kgt
kQetWHLNrNMo1wGqvxQWJyFQJJoDBG3lb5uq6dS2boiu/rWyL923cWOOUeOshBiQ
irpN1No/WY3ao90hvrVekbCmzbF8u9hm8YbDMnyTbh45UGLi4AodvamgeJbY0BJu
G+s5fk9b4ZPt9bJ9y3IK522p9vA2rTYYJHdBXA9EioMQ3YpE6rRLTnFqfwoQKQHi
XniD5H5ArgdTHYwbd0fQ4QmsnbDsxYPILLZloi4RxfkFCcfQwf3cM0ix9ZsHV+kz
zn7SQZcmo5ucCH5s3AzoRaBm7TQBwq6WhR0jPz4HHwHzK3qWJKNbfA==
=ujKr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Good catch Milly!
I had even read that post and had forgotten about it, just as with
Joe, I was not in "forensic" mode then.
But please don't reply. You lied*. You're still on my poo list,
and you're going to stay there. I don't care. You don't care. All
the better for both of us.
*
http://grc.com/x/talk.exe?cmd=article&group=grc.spyware&item=4293&utag=
Salaam!
Carlene wrote:
> Good catch Milly!
> I had even read that post and had forgotten about it,
> just as with Joe, I was not in "forensic" mode then.
Good place to have ended the post.
> But please don't reply. You lied*. You're still on my
> poo list, and you're going to stay there. I don't care.
> You don't care. All the better for both of us.
Aw, c'mon. Milly's almost as much of a control freak -- self
control first and always like dry ice or something -- as I am (since
neither of us can control anything else at all). It's a little hard
to take sometimes, but she's really sweet. Do yourself and everyone
else a good turn and put this one in your pocket and forget it, you
and she and I don't need the baggage. Okay?
was-salaam,
abujamal
- --
PCHelpers: Putting the "Personal" into "Personal Computers"
and closing the door on the tyranny of ignorance.
PCHelpers International: http://www.pchelpers.org/
news://news.pchelponline.org mailto:pche...@pchelpers.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
Comment: Unpublished key by intent of signer
iQEVAwUBOufQA9bWRcYTlnfrAQOdEQf9Gpfo6qsnyeOP9maBi8zqt4hMc9LpCkTC
uxWitwme7c5hpCj+sTtAOUMPXRX8qC+ubUtQCsxxaCJOz6K5UNX6eGw4hcz70UZY
X185bdke6HxJu07o4R65VPA3ptv6xVLR3R8/AGWvtCfFib2axzOOP+SLgY+XnV80
ZvfQJD+bT2pgp+rxjgiMY0zxdgzlm2B5feJuUOrguDqyVXLKyzNGE0+qB50rhqYZ
bTYidy7Yjf3ixS+AO2ahAbqP/QnnBDYMivXJTFAzekrt4T2zee8Osx2dwInLGAKw
e0m3EE0x/vKH+igLiZVXw4sz6mxQG8i1TLyhc7qeCeO1lk+snI9zTw==
=ZbRk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
There is no Joe! *grin*
> But please don't reply. You lied*. You're still on my poo list,
> and you're going to stay there. I don't care. You don't care. All
> the better for both of us.
More than enough of this to go around.
Sam
Maybe I shouldn't have. A little quote from Carlene's post:
<quote>
How about that "DAN"? Let's see a flurry of denials please. They
won't mean POOP. The cat's out of the bag!
</quote>
That seems bluntly challenging to me.
> > Also note the additional confirmation by Milly, further down the
> > thread. I think _that_ willing revelation is more conclusive
> > than a single (possibly erroneous) signage of a post. (I do
> > recall reading that post by dafunks, but at the time I wasn't
> > trying to keep any "forensics".. *lol*)
>
> I think he's a diversion. Where's Hellfirez? Not that I care ...
No argument from me on this one. Mind you, many of us become diversions at
one time or another.
> 6254 emails from that quarter. They've slowed down to a trickle.
> Ray Jones was bragging about getting 12,000 an hour for hours on end
> - -- I don't even get bragging privileges with this puny amateur hour
> joke. Oh, well.
Ah, so I guess the only good that you'll get from it is shutting down a
spammer. Bragging rights would have been a BIG bonus. Such a shame. *g*
Sam
Who wanted bragging rights so terribly bad.
k