Evo Tool Support

[Camie Fons]

The decision support tool provides guidance on shoreline erosion management strategies appropriate for your setting. This is not a design tool. Design specifications for any project should be done in consultation with regulatory authorities, technical advisors and contractors.

Not sure how to answer the questions? Each question has a help section. Simply click on the following each question. The pop-up window offers explanations, examples and pictures on how to measure and/or answer the question. Click the button located across the top of the help panel to close it. To clear all answers and reset the page, click the "Reset" button floating in the lower left corner of the tool.

Expanding access to contraceptive services and improving health outcomes require services to be delivered in ways that respect, protect and fulfill the human rights of everyone who seeks or uses contraceptive information and services.

This Support Tool provides practical guidance for assessing family planning programmes through a human rights lens. It provides a conceptual framework that shows what rights-based family planning looks like in practical programmatic terms. The tool creates a foundation for designing or improving family planning programmes that apply human rights principles and standards at all levels of the health care system. It was developed in response to a 2020 UNFPA study that identified a need for such guidance. The tool comprises a framework depicting an ideal human rights-based programme, an eight-step assessment and planning process as well as an agenda and materials for a stakeholder workshop.

And to meet these expectations, companies need to invest in the right technology. Tools that can make your teams more efficient, empower them to work smartly, and ultimately help create world-class experiences for the end customer.

Customer support tools come in handy as businesses scale. The more customers you add, the more queries your support team is bound to receive. When this happens, you need some tools and processes that can help your support staff handle such large volumes of work.

A help desk ticketing system allows customer service teams to log support tickets, streamline support workflows, automate the process of routing tickets to the right agents, and work collaboratively to reduce response time and deliver excellent customer service.

By investing in a knowledge base software tool, you can create, manage and share self-service content in the form of FAQs pages, how-to-videos, and step-by-step tutorials. One of the biggest benefits of having a knowledge base is that it brings down the workload of your support team, as customers can look for answers themselves.

Typically, every customer feedback survey comes with a set of questions that are related to a specific metric. These customer experience metrics include the Net Promoter Score (NPS), Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT),and Customer Effort Score (CES).

Oftentimes, customer support teams need to communicate with other internal teams while working on queries. This is why it is important to equip them with an easy-to-use internal communication tool that can be supplemented with a screen recorder.

The advantage of using such a tool is that it allows your frontline agents to have quick, contextual discussions with other employees from the same team and also with employees across different functions.

The ideal way to analyze the quality of customer support is through interactive dashboards that showcase critical metrics.These metrics provide detailed insights into how your support team is interacting with customers and how this is impacting larger outcomes such as loyalty and retention.

It makes data about any customer interaction available to any team member who may need it. A CRM is not just useful in tracking data and making it more accessible but can impact larger metrics like retention. For instance, investing in a CRM can help increase customer retention by 27%!

AI-powered email management tools utilise artificial intelligence to help teams sort, prioritize, and respond to emails in a hassle-free, efficient manner. Such a tool is useful in streamlining both internal and external communication as well as driving visibility and ownership across the team. Additionally, it adapts and learns from user behavior over time, becoming more effective at predicting preferences and needs.

Hmm, it sounds like this is something that may fit into the Wang tiles project @Benjamin_Trotter is working on this summer. To make sure we understand exactly what you mean, maybe you could provide your tileset and/or a mock-up or sketch showing what you mean in terms of terrain information editor and the desired behavior of the terrain tool?

As it stands, the tool works on tiles and for each corner of each tile, the terrain type is defined. So when you change something in that grid, it can figure out what tiles to use to make sure things connect again. This breaks down when the terrain pieces are 2x2 tiles. The pieces already used on the map would not necessarily be whole terrain pieces, since you could have placed only a 16x16 piece somewhere. With that it loses the ability to determine what the current state of the terrain is at a given location. I imagine you could work around this by essentially only considering valid terrain information when you find a 2x2 block that matches one of the blocks for which terrain information was defined.

But more importantly, if I understand correctly the native tilesize would need to be 32x32 such that the micro size is 16x16; but my atlases predominantly 16x16, that format would be out of the question.

Yes, you are correct this is not currently supported. In your instance, I would suggest switching off the AMP (E2) engine if you need to continue using the Throttle tool. I've included a screenshot beneath which will show you how you can turn this off. Click anywhere on the canvas, then in the configuration window select 'Runtime' then uncheck the box at the bottom to 'Use AMP Engine'.

This read-only field displays the path of the PHP engine for the local or remote PHP interpreter, through which the tool commands are executed. For more information about configuring PHP interpreters, refer to Configure local PHP interpreters and Configure remote PHP interpreters.

This read-only field shows the official name of the third party command line tool. The column is available only if the Show tool type checkbox is selected. For custom command line tools, the fields in this column are empty.

Click this button to open the Command Line Tools dialog and select the tool to integrate with PhpStorm. Depending on your choice, PhpStorm opens one of the following dialogs for specifying the location of the selected tool:

Go beyond with a remote support solution that can troubleshoot any device, anywhere. Remotely access servers, workstations, network devices, and unattended systems, such as off-network devices, robots, machines, kiosks, and any other devices.

BeyondTrust offers the only remote support product with FIPS 140-2, Level 1 Validation. This achievement is relevant for organizations to which FedRAMP, FISMA, DoDIN APL, Common Criteria, HIPAA and HITECH healthcare regulations apply, as well as any other private or public sector organizations that prioritize security.

We believe this recognition further validates BeyondTrust Remote Support as a leading solution in its class. Through BeyondTrust's own surveys, we are proud to share that over 70% of our Remote Support customers achieved reduced incident handling times with the product, while 85% have improved first-call resolutions, and 85% experienced increased customer satisfaction (CSAT) scores using the solution.

Any device or system anywhere is supported by BeyondTrust Remote Support, including Windows, Linux, macOS, Chrome OS, iOS, and Android devices. This also includes servers, workstations, network devices, and unattended systems, such as off-network devices, robots, machines, and any other devices.

Correctness-by-Construction (CbC) is an approach to incrementally create formally correct programs guided by pre- and postcondition specifications. A program is created using refinement rules that guarantee the resulting implementation is correct with respect to the specification. Although CbC is supposed to lead to code with a low defect rate, it is not prevalent, especially because appropriate tool support is missing. To promote CbC, we provide tool support for CbC-based program development. We present CorC, a graphical and textual IDE to create programs in a simple while-language following the CbC approach. Starting with a specification, our open source tool supports CbC developers in refining a program by a sequence of refinement steps and in verifying the correctness of these refinement steps using the theorem prover KeY. We evaluated the tool with a set of standard examples on CbC where we reveal errors in the provided specification. The evaluation shows that our tool reduces the verification time in comparison to post-hoc verification.

Correctness-by-Construction (CbC) [12, 13, 19, 23] is a methodology to construct formally correct programs guided by a specification. CbC can improve program development because every part of the program is designed to meet the corresponding specification. With the CbC approach, source code is incrementally constructed with a low defect rate [19] mainly based on three reasons. First, introducing defects is hard because of the structured reasoning discipline that is enforced by the refinement rules. Second, if defects occur, they can be tracked through the refinement structure of specifications. Third, the trust in the program is increased because the program is developed following a formal process [14].

Despite these benefits, CbC is still not prevalent and not applied for large-scale program development. We argue that one reason for this is missing tool support for a CbC-style development process. Another issue is that the programmer mindset is often tailored to the prevalent post-hoc verification approach. CbC has been shown to be beneficial even in domains where post-hoc verification is required [29]. In post-hoc verification, a method is verified against pre- and postconditions. In the CbC approach, we refine the method stepwise, and we can check the method partially after each step since every statement is surrounded by a pair of pre- and postconditions. The verification of refinement steps and Hoare triples reduces the proof complexity since the proof task is split into smaller problems. The specifications and code developed using the CbC approach can be used to bootstrap the post-hoc verification process and allow for an easier post-hoc verification as the method constructed using CbC generally is of a structure that is more amenable to verification [29].

c80f0f1006