--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GraphFrames" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to graphframes...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graphframes/CAG%2B_WJKxA%2BKSNeVzATFp1cqLo5-viWRnmCSPrXVvOPdi3xFoaw%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi James,
I totally agree with you. In fact, just last week, I asked Russell and Sem the same question: "Do we really want to merge GraphFrames with Spark? Spark is getting out of hand..."
Spark is a massive project with numerous issues, PRs, dependencies, and challenges. Do we really want to complicate things further? Graphs are a niche topic, and GraphFrames is already well-established in this domain. I don't think merging it with Spark will attract thousands of new users. If that’s our goal, we should focus more on promoting the library on LinkedIn, giving talks, fixing issues, publishing new releases, and adding exciting new features and integrations with other systems—not just Spark-based ones, but also Polars, Pandas, Snowpark, and more.
Regards,
Ángel
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graphframes/CANSvDjp75j_GdGPbet_Q6tYf%2B3N%3DWx_SkG6VfXvvDhf4zbG3iw%40mail.gmail.com.