Label Panel Box

1 view
Skip to first unread message

William Dupere

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 12:51:35 AM8/5/24
to granthylsayre
Ican tell from the "but" what you are asking for. That's the AutoEllipsis property of the Label. Set it to true and set the MaximumSize property so the label cannot get bigger than its container. The user will see ... so she'll realize the text is truncated. She'll hover the mouse over the label to get a tooltip with the full text.

I'm interested in trying to create simple corner labels for a multipanel figure I am preparing in ggplot. This is similar to this previously asked question, but the answers only explained how to include a label at the top of the plot, not produce a corner label in the format required by many journals. I hope to replicate something similar to the plotrix function corner.label() in ggplot2.


If you want to change the labelling style, you can either set this individually for each plot or set a theme default. I would recommend the second approach. Add the following line before you build your plots to make the font bold and blue


Here's a solution using a custom labeller function. This doesn't invovle any manipulations to the data. Currently it only works with 1-dimensional facets (facet_wrap). I'm still working on how to increment along a 2-D grid...


while migrating our dashboards from singlestat to stat panels I was missing a functionality. We used singlestat panels to show the labels of some metrics, e.g. to see the Go version and build tag. However I am unable to reproduce this with the new stat panels.


How do I get the Label for a Front Panel Control to appear in the Block Diagram but not on the Front Panel? On the Front Panel I am making a complex control that consists of a Slider and a Numerical Input box. Both Controls display the same information and either can be used for Input. When one changs, the other is made to display the same value.


But I only want the Slider to display the Label on the Front Panel, to avoid confusion. On the Block Diagram however, I want both controls to display their Labels so that I know what they are. How do I display the Label for a Control on the Block diagram, but not display its Label on the Front Panel?


I tried the reverse. I had the Label Not Visible on the Front Panel and went to the Block Diagram and change the Property on the Label to Visible. That caused the Label to appear on the Front Panel, but the Label did not appear on the Block Diagram. STRANGE. BUG.


How did you start out with the block diagram's label not being visible? Whenever I drop a control or indicator, the label is always visible on both the FP and BD by default. Maybe there is a LabVIEW option that causes new controls/indicators not to have their labels visible by default, but I have yet to find it. I don't think an item should ever be dropped without the label visible, good LabVIEW coding practice demands that the labels for control terminals on the block diagram be visible so that you know what control or indicator a wire is going to.


That being said, I have seen a lot of VI's posted where the label for the terminal on the BD is not shown (against good programming practice.) I've gone to the BD and right clicked to show the label. Sometimes, the people have an empty label (which will turn off the visibility for both the FP and BD) and I'm forced to add some text of my own into the label so I can figure out what their code is doing. When I add some text to the label, at that time, I find both the BD and FP labels become visible.


4. If you want a different label to appear on the FP than whatever you actually called the control, then use the caption. You can hide the label and show the caption. This is useful if you need to programmatically change what the "label" is on the front panel such if you are making an application that needs to change its user interface such as for a foreign language.


What are some of your thoughts on these labels on the wiring in the panel. They used the sheathing off of the Romex for the labels. I have seen it 2x so far and have recommended the labels be removed for safetey reasons as the sheathing should be removed once the wiring enters the panel.


Daniel, there is NO requirement that the sheathing be removed. You can leave it as long as you want. Doing neat work tells us differently. There is also NO safety concern with these, and absolutely no need to flag IMO.


This is strictly a personal installation situation. There is no concern for the labeling using the sheathing.

The mention that this passed inspection is not really relevant, as the cover is supposed to be installed for an inspection, and electrical inspectors are not permitted to remove equipment covers during the inspection process.


I agree with that. IF they were done by a qualified electrician, which most new constructions are, they are done correctly. It is the older homes that we have most of the problems with the labeling on.


Yes I have, there seems to be no option for add labels and tables. I've searched everywhere for a solution, I used to use labels all the time and am quite familiar with where it should be. Does Civil 2013 have this button?


Also verify how you are launching Civil 3D as there are options for Launching as AutoCad and if your using a desktop icon etc. to launch, the contents in the "Target" are important as they can be set to launch vanilla Acad or contain the AecBase.dbx info for launching C3d.


Mine is custom time picker which provides 1-14 day time selection [earliest and latest alone does not work]. I want to display the the label corresponding to the time picker value. in your suggestion , i want to display the value 1 day ago as label and not -1d@d.


The site is secure.

The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


The Nutrition Facts label on packaged foods was updated in 2016 to reflect updated scientific information, including information about the link between diet and chronic diseases, such as obesity and heart disease. The updated label makes it easier for consumers to make better informed food choices. The updated label appears on the majority of food packages. Manufacturers with $10 million or more in annual sales were required to update their labels by January 1, 2020; manufacturers with less than $10 million in annual food sales were required to update their labels by January 1, 2021. Manufacturers of most single-ingredient sugars, such as honey and maple syrup, and certain cranberry products had until July 1, 2021 to make the changes.


Final Rule: Serving Sizes of Foods That Can Reasonably Be Consumed At One Eating Occasion; Dual-Column Labeling; Updating, Modifying, and Establishing Certain Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed; Serving Size for Breath Mints; and Technical Amendments

See submitted comments, supporting documents, and references in Docket No. FDA-2004-N-0258.


The previous label was more than 20 years old when the changes were made. To make sure consumers have access to more recent and accurate nutrition information about the foods they are eating, FDA required changes based on updated scientific information, new nutrition and public health research, more recent dietary recommendations from expert groups, and input from the public.


The changes include modifying the list of required nutrients that must be declared on the label, updating serving size requirements, and providing a refreshed design. The current Nutrition Facts label makes it easier for consumers to make informed decisions about the food they eat.


The scientific evidence underlying the 2010, the 2015-2020, and the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans support reducing caloric intake from added sugars. Consuming too much added sugars can make it difficult to meet nutrient needs while staying within calorie limits.


The FDA recognizes that added sugars can be a part of a healthy dietary pattern. But if consumed in excess, it becomes more difficult to also eat foods with enough dietary fiber and essential vitamins and minerals and still stay within calorie limits. The updates to the label will help increase consumer awareness of the quantity of added sugars in foods. Consumers may or may not decide to reduce the consumption of certain foods with added sugars, based on their individual needs or preferences.


Sugars that are added during the processing of foods will have both the percent Daily Value and the number of grams of Added Sugars on their labels. Single-ingredient sugars such as table sugar, maple syrup, or honey will only have the percent Daily Value for Added Sugars listed on their labels. See the Nutrition Facts label for honey, maple syrup, or other single-ingredient sugars or syrups as well as for certain cranberry products.


The number of grams of Added Sugars in a serving of a cranberry product, as well as the percent Daily Value for Added Sugars, must still be labeled. FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for certain cranberry products to allow manufacturers to use a symbol leading to a statement that is truthful and not misleading placed outside the Nutrition Facts label. These manufacturers could explain, for example, that the sugars added to certain dried cranberries or cranberry beverage products are added to improve the palatability of naturally tart cranberries. See the Nutrition Facts label for honey, maple syrup, or other single-ingredient sugars or syrups as well as for certain cranberry products.


Trans fat will be reduced but not eliminated from foods, so FDA will continue to require it on the label. In 2015, the FDA published a final determination that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), the source of artificial trans fat, are not generally recognized as safe, but this determination would not affect naturally occurring trans fat, which would still exist in the food supply. Trans fat is present naturally in food from some animals, mainly ruminants such as cows and goats. Also, industry can currently use some oils that are approved as food additives and can still petition FDA for certain uses of PHOs.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages