You can buy it at Amazon for $49 or Lazada with free delivery for P3,150.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
Date: 1/9/17 10:11 AM (GMT+08:00)
Subject: Re: Best Lock Alternative,
Dear James,
Looks good. Where do we get it, and how much is it?
Sincerely,
Jack
Sent from my iPad
This is the best alternative lock. It is cheap. It is durable. The features are perfect for home owners and renters. It doesnt need conversion or adding of door holes. It doesnt look different from the old original locks. Dont complicate your problems guys. This is the solution to your lock problem. <image1.JPG>
Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2017, at 6:18 PM, 'Ericson B. Carungay' via The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group <
gramer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear Neighbors,Kindly educate me on this subject locksets? Is this applicable for unit with different tenant most of the time or good only for unit owners not renting out their units?Regards,Eric5008--------------------------------------------On Sat, 1/7/17, Jack Teer <jack...@ukusainc.com> wrote: Subject: RE: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) To: e...@novallo.com, "Tom Schoon" <schoo...@flatrate.net.au>, "jamesugarte" <james...@yahoo.com>, "Oddy Pilapil" <Jhapi...@msn.com>, jun...@gmail.com, gramer...@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, January 7, 2017, 12:40 AM Dear Erb, I sent an enquiry to Andar about remote revision. No reply yet. Yale and Schlage are the best locksets. Too bad about Gramercy engineering not changing the units, as they seem competent and economical, and it resolves access issues for installers. This is probably something I don't want to get involved in on a detailed level. Good to know if I have mine changed, even to a lever type, I won't be forced to remove it. Sincerely, Jack At 10:21 PM 1/6/2017, e...@novallo.com wrote: Jack, Gramercy engineering won't do it as you can't officially change them. But I was told by the higher ups that as long as they match the color and style (bulbs, NOT levers) Then they won't make you take them down. I did bring another batch of the Schlage locks over. They can't be changed remotely, but it takes less than a minute to delete the code and add a new one. Schlage is one of the top 2 brands besides Yale, and they are SUPER QUALITY. Erb -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) From: "Tom Schoon" < schoo...@flatrate.net.au> Date: Thu, January 05, 2017 11:13 pm To: "jamesugarte" <james...@yahoo.com>, "Oddy Pilapil" <Jhapi...@msn.com>, <jun...@gmail.com>, < gramer...@googlegroups.com>, "Jack Teer" <jack...@ukusainc.com
I would be interested. Being based overseas I would require installation even if its done by Gramercy Engineering. Can these be accessed and pin changed remotely? ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Teer To: jamesugarte ; Oddy Pilapil ; jun...@gmail.com ; gramer...@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 3:42 PM Subject: RE: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) Dear All, We are the Andar Lock distributors in the Philippines. We carry the attached 3 locksets. Installation isn't automatic, but it's no big deal. We normally only supply and install for new-build, high-rise commercial/residential projects. However, if anyone is interested in buying these wholesale, I can put together an order - if there are enough takers to make it worthwhile. The prices are the best I've seen, but depend on size of order. Sincerely, Jack #3317 At 09:13 PM 1/5/2017, 'jamesugarte' via The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & wrote: This is the best and cheapest we can use. Its $49 at amazon & p3,150 free delivery at Lazada. The appearance is the closest to our original existing door knobs. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Oddy Pilapil <Jhapi...@msn.com> Date: 12/29/16 10:18 PM (GMT+08:00) To: jun...@gmail.com, gramer...@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) Hi I’m Oddy Pilapil (Unit5727), Jumping on the conclusion, it’s the best way to have these keyless entry locks instastall in our individual units. There are numerous kinds/type of these locks now in the market and can wirelessly controlled via an app. (google it or YouTube it). The question is “which lock should we installll†so we can have uniformity. With these locks we can control who and when people have access to our units. For example you can set a PIN code that works 6 hrs for the cleaner. You can even open it remotely. Please visit www.yale.co.uk for more information. Please let me know your feedback, once we decide which type/brand of these locks we will install. We can set someone to install it and buy these lock in bulk orders and who knows we might even get free installations. Cheers, Happy Holidays! From: gramer...@googlegroups.com [ mailto:gramer...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jun Kabigting, MBA/MS/SPHRi Sent: 04 June 2016 00:55 To: gramer...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) Allan, Great suggestion but a credit card type of lock will be more an administrative nightmare for the owners and PMO! It's also expensive as it will involve purchasing another IT system which PMO doesn't have the competency to operate and maintain. The digital lock suggested by Erb is I think the best option in terms of budget with zero maintenance and takes 15 mins to install by his team. However, if there is a credit card type of key that can be independently installed individually, pls let the group so that they can consider this as an option. Regards, Jun On Saturday, 4 June 2016, 'ALLAN B. BYRON' via The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group < gramer...@googlegroups.com> wrote: Hi folks, A keyless lock, ( like a credit card) the one use in hotels, where you can just change codes anytime may be the solution, but at what cost? just wondering. ALLAN B. BYRON Unit 5419, 6002 -----Original Message----- From: 'Ginalyn Takahashi' via The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group < gramer...@googlegroups.com> To: Pmo Loop- Property Management Office < p...@gramercyatcenturycity.com> Cc: operationsmanager < operatio...@gramercyatcenturycity.com> Sent: Thu, Jun 2, 2016 11:07 pm Subject: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) The Gramercy Residences PMO (General Manager) Engr. Norie Libed Operating Manager Sarah Rafer Dear Sarah Rafer Further to my email dated 31 May 2016, I am requesting for urgent attention to my request to have the keyless entry lock fixed. My current guest report that he had lost money staying in my unit. We reported this matter to your Security Dept who interviewed my guest and studied the CCTV footage. Fortunately, the footage did not show anyone entering my apartment and he accepted the Security Dept CCTV footage and explanation. I could not imagine if there will be an actual incident of a similar nature and the question of duplication of keys by previous tenants cannot be ruled out and put owners at risk. My solution to this is to change to a keyless entry lock system whereby owners can rest new number passwords and minimize the risk of duplication I request for PMO's urgent attention to my request. Sincerely, Takahashi, Ginalyn Unit Owner 5920 Begin forwarded message: From: Ginalyn Takahashi < ginalynt...@yahoo.com> Date: June 1, 2016 at 10:25:59 AM GMT+9 To: in...@gramercyatcenturycity.com Cc: operatio...@gramercyatcenturycity.com Subject: Re: TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (ERRATUM) & TGR-BC-201605-06 Proper Use of Toilet Facilities The Gramercy Residences PMO (General Manager) Engr. Norie Libed Operating Manager Ms. Sarah Rafer Dear Sarah Rafer, I am writing to follow up for our request to have the keyless entry lock fixed in my unit 5920. I understand the memorandum below, however, some of the unit owners in Gramercy have already installed the one endorsed by one of the unit owners, Mr. Erb and approved by the former general manager, Joseph Bactol. Erb and myself discussed this with your General manager, Engr. Norie Libed at your office.and had discussed this matter. Ms. Norie Libed mentioned she will discuss this matter at the board meeting last May 6th, Friday, 2016. Three weeks had past and I haven't heard anything about it. My caretaker had been in constant follow up but no update from your office. We believe our request is reasonable for the board of directors approval. 1) As a unit owner, who lease out my unit for short term lease, it is advisable to upgrade the security of my unit, and make sure our guest won't lose a key, wherein the possibility of losing a key is very high risk or keys can be duplicated. We would like to avoid this and take extra measure not to encounter this kind of problem with our guest. Another matter, I am writing to you, is the implementation of the access card, indicating more than 10 access card in a year, there will be additional charges of 500 pesos per request. The last time, When, I visited your office (May 2,2016) You have mentioned that this memorandum is still needed to get though with the board of directors meetings. You didn't hear much from me about it, then because I am confident this will be consulted with the majority of unit owners before it will be passed by the board. I was surprised to hear this news from my caretaker that the new policy of the access cards has already been implemented. I strongly request to your office and to the higher board to reconsider for short term lease, where in, we lease out our unit for a minimum of three nights. Considering your policy for 10 access card in a year is very much possible for a short period within a month. This will give us (unit owners) an extra added pinch! We understand, that printing the access cards are absolutely added to your running costs. However; charging unit owners 500 pesos per request is unacceptable to us and not reasonable to charge 500 pesos per card to unit owners. As a unit owner, who lived overseas, we have all the right to lease out our unit for us to be able to pay for the up-keeping the unit and other fees. It would be highly appreciated if you could consider the benefits of having our unit leased out in a short term basis without feeling suppressed by your policy. We highly suggest, if you are really for this issuance of green access cards for short term lease, why not come up with one time issuance of green cards, like the ones issued by the hotels; machine readable, without having the guest photo ID imprint on it. I believe it is better and more efficient, less costly, less job on your part and more convenient for everyone. Where cards aren't necessary to have the guest name, face on it, either date of check in and check out on the access card, but you all have the records intact on your machine, for your monitoring purposes. Sincerely, Takahashi, Ginalyn Unit owner 5920 Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Gramercy Info < in...@gramercyatcenturycity.com> wrote: Dear Valued Unit Owners Please disregard TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas sent May 28, 2016. Attached herewith is the copy of Circular for the following: 1. TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas (REVISED) 2. TGR-BC-201605-06 Proper Use of Toilet Facilities For your information and guidance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a system generated message. Do not reply to this e-mail ID. Thank you. <TGR-BC-201605-05 Uniformity of Common Areas.jpg> <TGR-BC-201605-06 Proper Use of Toilet Facilities.jpg> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/4374F9DE-770F-4072-9399-3F35264088DD%40yahoo.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/15517f8f299-57d2-5532%40webprd-a20.mail.aol.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Carpe Diem, Jun Kabigting, MBA/MS/SPHRi Managing Director, HR Central K.K. Chief Community Officer, The Japan HR Society (JHRS) Managing Editor, The HR Agenda--Japan's first & only bilingual HR magazine Founding Chairman, The Kabataang-Pilipino Foundation Inc. (KPFI) Connect with Jun: LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/CAAJ2tcXMHQ4LiUDDSdD2E7Zc28MvNKaan2a1rK_BtG%3DBY6kikA%40mail.gmail.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/7kunc6llwadyxb5e7uo3oqw9.1483621635516%40email.android.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/586f2075.cc4f240a.4423e.4533SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/586f2075.cc4f240a.4423e.4533SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/A8C1FD45AD0D4A89AE1B1B419F12A9A8%40xpone . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Content-ID: <6658EB14BDE3487DA5872ACAD4C32274@xpone> Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="fb44862.jpg"; Content-Disposition: inline; filename="fb44862.jpg"; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/5870d3bf.8ae1240a.78f92.e71dSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/5870d3bf.8ae1240a.78f92.e71dSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Gramercy Residences Homeowners Advocacy & Action Group" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gramercyphil...@googlegroups.com.To post to this group, send email to gramer...@googlegroups.com.Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/gramercyphils.To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gramercyphils/823404018.740143.1483870717264%40mail.yahoo.com.For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.