Hi,
It would be best to keep format compatible with old airprobe so it would
be possible to use it with software that processed data in this format.
My proposition is to start with something that carries all needed data
and can be implemented easily/quickly. So Roman, you can start straight
away with the solution that you proposed, without adding these C0, C1...
tags. They can be added later.
After that we can use demapper blocks to add number of a burst in the
message - because the demapper should know it best. We can use tags that
are associated with a message for it. They are carried by first element
of the pair that creates PDU message (only second part carrying binary
data is currently used).
Regarding printing of keystream and decrypted bursts along encrypted
bursts - I think it would be worth implementing this only if this is
really required by some other (useful) program.
Best Regards,
Piotr
W dniu 12.07.2015 o 09:03, roman khassraf pisze:
>
> I think it's not so easy to get all airprobe output printed in the burst
> printer, because the printer is not aware which burst is the first burst
> of a message ( this concerns the C1 / C0 tag in airprobe). Same for
> keystream and the xor'ed payload. However I think these information are
> not necessary, because when attempting the key recovery, one has to
> target specific messages, hence the user has to identify those messages
> before the attempt, which also implies the identification of the start
> burst number of the message. And for the keystream, airprobe prints the
> keystream and the xor'ed data only after a key is provided. So for the
> key recovery, this information is not available. We could add this
> feature to the decryption block, but imho it's usefulness is limited.
>
> So, I would propose adding two new options to the burst printer:
>
> prepend modified framenumber: as for framenumber, if checked, we also
> prepend the modified fnr
> print payload only: if checked, we print only the payload instead all
> bits of the burst
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 19:08:57 UTC+2, Piotr Krysik wrote:
>
> W dniu 08.07.2015 o 16:26,
robert....@gmail.com
> <mailto:
robert....@gmail.com> pisze: