Dennis,
adding to what Alex has said, and slightly intrigued by the differences in output, leads one to the APRS specification (to be found at http://www.aprs.org/doc/APRS101.PDF, and with subsequent revisions, not really relevant to this question). Page 20 of that document, towards the bottom, reads:
Two APRS data formats use base-91 notation: lat/long coordinates inNow all becomes clear! GQRX is presenting the Base-91 data as is, but Direwolf is parsing and decoding the APRS data back to its original form. In short, they are both correct!
compressed format (see Chapter 9) and the altitude in Mic-E format (see
Chapter 10).
Base-91 data is compressed into a short string of characters. All the
characters are printable ASCII, with character codes in the range 33–124
decimal (i.e. ! through |).
HTH, 73,
Robin, G8DQX
Alex, Alexander,
perhaps neither myself nor David made ourselves clear. The APRS frame which Dennis quoted has encoded geographic co-ordinates. The encoding is Base-91. The APRS specification also allows for co-ordinates to be sent en-clair. Both are correct.
As to why one would choose encoding (which the specification refers to as compression) as opposed to en-clair transmission, that is quite another question, way off-topic for GQRX!
If one really wished to use GQRX as a front-end for APRS, then feeding UDP audio from GQRX to Direwolf might be a good way to go.
Robin, G8DQX