Have recently attempted to make replies to messages posted on Jane's no longer so new Board, sometimes without success. Also found that the list of other boards covering the topics are no longer listed, so one has to search through for example Google or one's personal favourites list to reach this board. There are far fewer people writing in to the Board Jane set up, than POC had in the heyday of this one, so I suspect they were deleted to discourage people from looking elsewhere. A typical politician-like trick !
I really wanted to discuss Richard's post about the trade union that includes Tube train drivers wanting to go on strike to object to some of their members being sacked for drinking alcoholic beverages on the job ! If this is true (the only reference cited was the DAILY MAIL, which I do not rate as a very reliable Source), then I suggest that as soon as they can those that run the London Tube trains (it used to be London Transport in my time in London, but quite possibly they have all been piratised by now), should hurry the development of Robotic Drivers for tube trains.
A Robot does not need to drink alcohol, or anything else. It does not get tired or bored. The tasks required are simple and limited and repetitive, so that humn drivers easily get bored or distracted. All the driver has to do is to close the doors, start the train, and drive off to the next station, where it stops the train, opens the doors for passengers to get out and in, then close the doors and start the train again. It does not have to steer the train as it rolls along on lines that it cannot leave. Red and Green Lights signal when to start and when to stop. Such work is well within the ability of robots already available, and they will operate far more safely than humans, who get bored, distracted, tired, and it appears need to drink alcohol, which then renders them even worse drivers than they already are.
Passengers would very quickly see how much safer Robots are for driving tube trains. That a Trade Union would seek to defend people who drive trains whilst drunk, is unacceptable. With the evidence and the sackings that proove the drivers' unsuitability for being entrusted with the lives of passengers, people would very soon adapt to rely on the safer, less fallible alternative.
Trade Unions in themselves are not to blame - in various countries you can find Trade Unions behaving very differently.
In Sweden they have members sitting on the Board of companies, alongside those representing Shareholders, and they see no conflict of interest, because the Company has to be successful and to make a fair profit in order to pay the workers. In Germany, they have Betriebsrate, which are like unions but confined to a particular company. The Representative of the Workers is voted for by the Working Staff, and the Law protects her or him from being sacked by the Management, so that he can really discuss matters arising in an independent manner with the Management, knowing that however tough he is about a matter he is safe. This works especially well with smaller and medium sized businesses - they have traditional Trade Unions in larger companies in the big, engineering industries.
In former E European countries during the Communist Era, the Unions were running the show with the Government and the local Management. Outsiders probably thought that they just pushed the Party Line, but in fact they did often argue to get a better deal or conditons for the working members - they were certainly not just CP Yes-men.
In the USA, some of the trade unions are more like criminal gangs - the Teamsters in particular are or were notorious throughout the world for being corrupt and for playing cruel games with people.
British trade unions can be bloody-minded and stupid, just like the managements, the governents and the workers often are.
I guess it is true that countries get the kinds of unions they deserve, just like they get the kinds of governments they deserve.