[Federal Register: June 20, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 38275-38277]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20jn00-62]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. CP00-51-000 and CP00-51-001]
East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare
an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Rocky Top Expansion
Project, and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
June 14, 2000.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the construction, testing,
operation, and abandonment of facilities proposed in the East Tennessee
Natural Gas Company (East Tennessee) Rocky Top Expansion Project in
various counties of Virginia and Tennessee.\1\ These facilities would
consist of about 15.1 miles of pipeline, about 0.7 mile of pipeline
replacements at seventeen road crossings, three new meter stations and
a modification to an existing meter station, mainline valves, uprating
of four compressor units and four meter stations, hydrostatic testing
of about 26.7 miles of pipeline to increase the maximum allowable
operating pressure (MAOP), and the abandonment of about 0.7 mile of
pipeline. The EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-making
process to determine whether the project is in the public convenience
and necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ East Tennessee's original application was filed with the
Commission on December 13, 1999, under Section 7 of the Natural Gas
Act and Part 157 of the Commission's regulations. East Tennessee's
amended application filed on May 10, 2000, changes the locations of
the proposed Lenoir City and Etowah Meter Stations and proposes the
installation of new relief valves, new mainline valves, and the
replacement of mainline valves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are a landowner on East Tennessee's proposed route and
receive this notice, you may be contacted by a pipeline company
representative about the acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The pipeline company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the project is approved by the Commission, that approval conveys with
it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations
fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could initiate
condemnation proceedings in accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' was attached to the
project notice East Tennessee provided to landowners along and adjacent
to those proposed route. This fact sheet addresses a number of
typically asked questions, including the use of eminent domain and how
to participate in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for
viewing on the FERC Internet website (www.ferc.fed.us).
This Notice of Intent (NOI) is being sent to landowners of property
crossed by and adjacent to East Tennessee's amended facility locations
and to the Commission's list of parties to the proceeding.
Summary of the Proposed Project
East Tennessee is proposing the Rocky Top Expansion Project to
satisfy the growing demand for natural gas in the western Virginia and
eastern Tennessee regions. The project would provide new firm service
to meet increased market demand of specific customers as well as
provide system-wide benefits. East Tennessee is requesting
authorization to increase its pipeline capacity by a total of 35,068
dekatherms (Dth) per day through the installation of additional
pipeline, hydrostatic testing to increase MAOP, pipeline replacement,
compressor horsepower and meter station uprates, and installation of
additional metering facilities.
East Tennessee proposes to construct the following new facilities
on its 3300 and 3100 Lines:
[[Page 38276]]
<bullet> About 15.1 miles of 12-inch-diameter pipeline loop \2\ in
Wythe, Smyth, and Washington Counties, Virginia;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A loop is a segment of pipeline that is installed adjacent
to an existing pipeline and connected to it on both ends. The loop
allows more gas to be moved through the pipeline system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Four new meter stations--the Hawkins Meter Station in
Greene County, Tennessee; the Lenoir City Meter Station in Roane
County, Tennessee; the Etowah Meter Station in McMinn County,
Tennessee; and a bi-directional meter station at the existing Citizens
Meter Station in Morgan, County, Tennessee.
East Tennessee proposed to increase the MAOP of several sections on
its 3100 and 3200 Lines through hydrostatic testing activities and
pipeline replacements at road crossing:
<bullet> Uprate the MAOP of about 12.8 miles of 22-inch-diameter
pipeline from main line valve (MLV) 3107-1A in Overton County,
Tennessee to MLV 3108-1 in Fentress County, Tennessee, through
hydrostatic testing, including pipeline replacements at six road
crossings, and the installation of pressure control facilities at East
Tennessee's Monterey Lateral;
<bullet> Uprate the MAOP of about 4.6 miles of 22-inch-diameter
pipeline from MLV 3107-1 to MLV 3107-1A in Overton County, Tennessee,
through hydrostatic testing of a pipeline replacement at one road
crossing \3\, and the installation of a new relief valve within valve
section 3107;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In 1999, as part of the Virginia Expansion Project (Docket
No. CP98-40-000), this 4.6 mile section was uprated by hydrostatic
testing and replacing pipeline at all of the road crossings in this
section, except for one
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Uprate the MAOP of about 13.6 miles of 22-inch-diameter
pipeline from MLV 3105-1 in Smith County, Tennessee to MLV 3105-1E2 in
Jackson County, Tennessee, through hydrostatic testing, including
pipeline replacement at ten road crossings, the installation of
pressure control facilities at East Tennessee's Carthage Lateral, and
the installation of a new relief valve, four new MLVs, and the
replacement of four MLVs within valve section 3105;
<bullet> Uprate the MAOP of the 0.3 mile dual 10-inch-diameter
Tennessee River pipeline crossing in Hamilton County, Tennessee,
through hydrostatic testing of the crossing, and the relocation of the
river crossing valve assemblies; and
<bullet> Uprate the MAOPs of four existing meter stations on the
3200 Line in Hamilton County, Tennessee.
East Tennessee also proposes an uprate of horsepower (hp) at two
compressor stations:
<bullet> Uprate of two turbine units from 1,000 hp to 1,450 hp, and
one unit from 1000 hp to 1,360 hp at Station 3101 in Robertson County,
Tennessee, and
<bullet> Uprate of the single turbine unit from 1,360 hp to 1,590
hp at Station 3210 in Marion County, Tennessee.
East Tennessee also proposes to replace 0.7 mile of pipeline at the
seventeen road crossings in order to meet the applicable U.S.
Department of Transportation strength and safety regulations applicable
to the higher MAOP. As such, East Tennessee proposes to abandon by
removal 0.6 mile and abandon in place 0.1 mile of pipeline to effect
this replacement.
The general location of East Tennessee's proposed facilities is
shown on the map attached as appendix1.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available on the
Commission's website at the ``RIMS'' link or from the Commission's
Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street, NE,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. For
instructions on connecting to RIMS refer to the last page of this
notice. Copies of the appendixes were sent to all those receiving
this notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Proposed Pipeline Looping--Virginia: Construction of East
Tennessee's proposed pipeline facilities would require about 235 acres
of land. East Tennessee proposes to use a 100-foot-wide construction
right-of-way, and retain a 50-foot wide permanent pipeline right-of-
way. Total land requirements for the permanent right-of-way would be
about 91 acres.
Proposed MAOP Increase and Hydrotest--Tennessee: The replacement of
seventeen road crossings associated with the MAOP increase and the
hydrostatic testing of about 26.7 miles of pipeline would affect about
57 acres of land needed during construction and to install the proper
facilities for testing, and would require about 7 acres of land during
operation. About 2.4 acres of land would be disturbed during the
relocation of the existing valves at the Tennessee River Crossing, of
which about 0.2 acre would be permanently affected. All temporary work
space would be allowed to revert to its original land use.
Proposed Meter Stations and Pressure Control Facilities--Tennessee:
Construction of three new meter stations would affect about 2 acres of
land and would require about 0.8 acre of land during operation. About
0.2 acre of land within an existing meter station would be affected by
the installation of a bi-directional meter. East Tennessee would
disturb about 1 acre of land in the hydrostatic testing of its four
existing meter stations, with no additional land required for
operation. The installation of the Pressure control facilities would
require about 1.8 acres of land within the existing permanent right-of-
way and would require no additional permanent operating acreage.
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\5\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. We call this ``scoping.'' The main goal of the scoping
process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this NOI, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All
comments received are considered during the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environment staff
of the Office of Energy Projects, part of the Commission staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending
on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be
published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, elected
officials, affected landowners, regional public interest groups, Indian
tribes, local newspapers and libraries, and the Commission's official
service list for this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for
review if the EA is published. We will consider all comments on the EA
before we make our recommendations to the Commission.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
construction and operation of the proposed project. We have already
identified a number of issues that we think deserve attention based on
a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and the environmental
information provided by East Tennessee. This preliminary list of issues
may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
<bullet> Geology and Soils
--Potential geologic hazards.
--Crossing of erosion prone soils.
<bullet> Water Resources and Wetlands
--Impact on groundwater and surface water resources.
--Impact on wetland hydrology.
<bullet> Biological Resources
[[Page 38277]]
--Impact on wildlife and fishery habitats.
--Potential impact on Federal- and State-listed threatened or
endangered species.
<bullet> Cultural Resources
--Effect on prehistoric and historic sites.
--Native American concerns.
<bullet> Land Use
--Impact on residential areas (7 residences within 50 feet of the
construction work area in Virginia and 1 residence within 50 feet of
the construction work area in Tennessee).
--Impact on public lands and special use areas including the Tennessee
River Park.
--Visual effect of the new aboveground facilities on surrounding areas.
<bullet> Air and Noise Quality
--Impacts on local air quality and noise environment as a result of the
operation of the uprated horsepower units at existing Compressor
Stations 3101 and 3210.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the project. By becoming a commentor, your
concerns will be addressed in the EA and considered by the Commission.
You should focus on the potential environmental effects of the
proposal, alternatives to the proposal (including alternative locations
or routes), and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impact. The
more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. Please
carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your comments are
received in time and properly recorded:
<bullet> Send two copies of your letter to: David P. Boergers,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE.,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
<bullet> Label one copy of the comments for the attention of
Environmental Gas Group 1, PJ-11.1;
<bullet> Reference Docket Nos. CP00-51-000 and CP00-51-001; and
<bullet> Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before July 14, 2000.
[If you do not want to send comments at this time but still want to
remain on our mailing list, please return the Information Request
(appendix 3). If you do not return the Information Request, you will be
removed from the environmental mailing list.]
Becoming an Intervener
In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an official party to the proceeding known as an
``intervenor.'' Intervenors play a more formal role in the process.
Among other things, intervenors have the right to receive copies of
case-related Commission documents and filings by other intervenors.
Likewise, each intervenor must provide 14 copies of its filings to the
Secretary of the Commission and must send a copy of its filings to all
other parties on the Commission's service list for this proceeding. If
you want to become an intervenor you must file a motion to intervene
according to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see appendix 2). Only intervenors have the
right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision.
Affected landowners and parties with environmental concerns may be
granted intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they
have a clear and direct interest in this proceeding which would not be
adequately represented by any other parties. You do not need intervenor
status to have your environmental comments considered.
Additional information about the proposed project is available from
Mr. Paul McKee of the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202)
208-1088 or on the FERC website (www.ferc.fed.us) using the ``RIMS''
link to information in this docket number. Click on the ``RIMS'' link,
select ``Docket #'' from the RIMS Menu, and follow the instructions.
For assistance with access to RIMS, the RIMS helpline can be reached at
(202) 208-2222.
Similarly, the ``CIPS'' link on the FERC Internet website provides
access to the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such
as orders, notices, and rulemakings. From the FERC Internet website,
click on the ``CIPS'' link, select ``Docket #'' from the CIPS menu, and
follow the instructions. For assistance with access to CIPS, the CIPS
helpline can be reached at (202) 208-2474.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15481 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M