2000CRH4597D ABRAHAM LINCOLN INTERPRETATIVE CENTER
no...@house.gov
[Congressional Record: June 19, 2000 (House)]
[Page H4597-H4600]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr19jn00-62]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN INTERPRETATIVE CENTER
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 3084) to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to
contribute funds for the establishment of an interpretative center on
the life and contributions of President Abraham Lincoln, as amended.
The Clerk read as follows:
H.R. 3084
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD ESTABLISHMENT OF ABRAHAM
LINCOLN INTERPRETIVE CENTER.
(a) Grants Authorized.--Subject to subsections (b) and (c),
the Secretary of the Interior shall make grants to contribute
funds for the establishment in Springfield, Illinois, of an
interpretive center to preserve and make available to the
public materials related to the life of President Abraham
Lincoln and to provide interpretive and educational services
which communicate the meaning of the life of Abraham Lincoln.
(b) Plan and Design.--
(1) Submission.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the entity selected by the Secretary
of the Interior to receive grants under subsection (a) shall
submit to the Secretary a plan and design for the
interpretive center, including a description of the
following:
(A) The design of the facility and site.
(B) The method of acquisition.
(C) The estimated cost of acquisition, construction,
operation, and maintenance.
(D) The manner and extent to which non-Federal entities
will participate in the acquisition, construction, operation,
and maintenance of the center.
(2) Consultation and cooperation.--The plan and design for
the interpretive center shall be prepared in consultation
with the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of
Illinois and in cooperation with such other public,
municipal, and private entities as the Secretary considers
appropriate.
(c) Conditions on Grant.--
(1) Matching requirement.--A grant under subsection (a) may
not be made until such time as the entity selected to receive
the grant certifies to the Secretary of the Interior that
funds
[[Page H4598]]
have been contributed by the State of Illinois or raised from
non-Federal sources for use to establish the interpretive
center in an amount equal to at least double the amount of
that grant.
(2) Relation to other lincoln-related sites and museums.--
The Secretary of the Interior shall further condition the
grant under subsection (a) on the agreement of the grant
recipient to operate the resulting interpretive center in
cooperation with other Federal and non-Federal historic
sites, parks, and museums that represent significant
locations or events in the life of Abraham Lincoln.
Cooperative efforts to promote and interpret the life of
Abraham Lincoln may include the use of cooperative
agreements, cross references, cross promotion, and shared
exhibits.
(d) Prohibition on Contribution of Operating Funds.--Grant
amounts may not be used for the maintenance or operation of
the interpretive center.
(e) Non-Federal Operation.--The Secretary of Interior shall
have no involvement in the actual operation of the
interpretive center, except at the request of the non-Federal
entity responsible for the operation of the center.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior a total
of $50,000,000 to make grants under subsection (a). Amounts
so appropriated shall remain available for expenditure
through fiscal year 2006.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Indiana (Mr. Souder) and the gentlewoman from the Virgin Islands (Mrs.
Christensen) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Souder).
General Leave
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their
remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 3084.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Indiana?
There was no objection.
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3084, as amended, introduced
by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus). This bill authorizes the
Secretary of Interior to contribute up to $50 million in matching funds
for the construction of an Abraham Lincoln Interpretative Center. H.R.
3084 assures that every dollar of Federal contribution must be matched
by at least $2 from the non-Federal side.
The center would consist of a museum and an archive library which
would house the world's largest collection of Lincoln material. H.R.
3084 allows 18 months from the time of enactment for the entity
selected by the Secretary of Interior to submit the design, method of
acquisition, and estimated cost of the center.
{time} 1415
The selected entity is also responsible for describing the manner and
role that non-Federal entities will participate for this center.
Madam Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to support H.R. 3084, as
amended.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
(Mrs. CHRISTENSEN asked and was given permission to revise and extend
her remarks.)
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Madam Speaker, H.R. 3084 authorizes the Secretary
of the Interior to make available $50 million in grants as a
contribution of funds for the establishment of an interpretive center
on the life and contributions of President Abraham Lincoln.
The center is to be operated by a non-Federal entity, which would
have to submit to the Secretary a plan and design for the interpretive
center within 18 months of enactment. The legislation specifies that
Federal funds would have to be matched on the basis of at least double
the amount of any grant made by the Secretary. The bill also specifies
that no grant funds may be used for maintenance or operation of the
interpretive center, and that the Secretary would have no involvement
in the operation of the center except at the request of the non-Federal
entity.
We are all aware of the important role President Lincoln has had in
American history. That role has been honored in five national park
system units alone. H.R. 3084 would expand on that recognition by
making funds available for a new interpretive center to be built by
State and local entities in Springfield, Illinois.
There appears to be significant interest in such an interpretive
center, and we have no objection to the legislation.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I yield 6 minutes to the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Shimkus), who has been a tireless leader in this effort;
along with the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood); our speaker in the
chair today, the gentlewoman from Illinois (Mrs. Biggert); and the
Speaker of the House, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hastert). And
many of us from Kentucky are also happy to support the efforts of those
from Illinois, but I thank this gentleman for his leadership.
Mr. SHIMKUS. Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague, the gentleman from
Indiana (Mr. Souder), for yielding me this time, and I too am excited
about this opportunity.
Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3084, legislation that
would authorize the establishment of an interpretive center on the life
and contributions of President Abraham Lincoln. This is a project I
have been working on, with my colleagues from Illinois, for the last 2
years. And I want to particularly also thank all my colleagues on the
committee, along with my colleague who shares the City of Springfield,
the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood); and the Speaker of the House,
the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hastert), who have been very helpful
in pushing this forward.
As my colleagues know, the entire Illinois delegation is also as
supportive of H.R. 3084. In the House, my legislation has all 19
Members of the Illinois delegation as cosponsors. The companion
legislation in the Senate has the solid support of both our Senators,
Senator Dick Durbin and Senator Peter Fitzgerald. Back home in
Springfield, this legislation has the full support of both the City of
Springfield, in which this project will be located, and that of the
governor of the State of Illinois, George Ryan.
In fact, the State of Illinois has already appropriated $10 million
and in the very near future will appropriate an additional $40 million
for the project. In addition, the City of Springfield has committed $10
million for this project through local tax incentives.
With an eye towards fiscal integrity, we have placed a matching
requirement in this legislation, which ensures that the Federal
Government is only responsible for funding one-third of the entire
project's cost. The remaining two-thirds is required to come from
State, local, and private organizations.
We have also clearly stated in the legislation that Federal funds may
not be used to operate this facility. We view this project as a one-
time expenditure to the Federal Government, not a long-term funding
initiative that needs continual funding year after year. Mr. Speaker,
the bill authorizes $50 million for the project and makes these funds
available for expenditure through 2006.
Abraham Lincoln's name is familiar to people all over the world. More
than 100 nations have honored him through the issuance of stamps,
bringing his name to millions of people and keeping his memory and
message alive.
It is very common for many of us, especially in the State of Illinois
and the surrounding States, to attend annual Lincoln Day dinners,
whether they are dinners or lunches. In fact, I counted 15 that I had
celebrating the birth of Abraham Lincoln from January through April.
And many times, when we get a chance to reminisce on President Abraham
Lincoln, we almost raise him up to a deity status, and we do that in an
attempt not to forget history. It is very important to remember
history.
I did that in my last year's worth of speeches, talking about Abraham
Lincoln and how he secured America's future by preserving the union and
by freeing the slaves. But I want to focus on a column written by
Clarence Page from the Chicago Tribune, and I will be submitting this
for the Record.
In his column Mr. Page mentions that there are still naysayers.
Lerone Bennett, Jr., is one, in his book ``Forced Into Glory: Abraham
Lincoln's White Dream.'' At the end of the column, however, Clarence
Page writes, ``Like Thomas Jefferson and other heroic figures in
American history, Lincoln set a higher standard for human brotherhood
and sisterhood than even he was able to meet. Still, we can admire
Lincoln, as I still do, inasmuch as
[[Page H4599]]
he set that high standard during his better moments and acted on it.
Lincoln is important, not only to Americans, but around the world, as a
symbol of how an ordinary man from very humble beginnings can rise to
high office and lead his country through its worst crisis and all-out
war against itself. If he was `forced into glory' against his will or
not, he has worn the glory remarkably well.''
Mr. Page's column really emphasizes why we need the Lincoln Library.
We need it to remember the past. And we need to remember that Abraham
Lincoln was not a God, but he was an average person called upon at a
very historical time in our history. We need to focus on the fact that
with all his foibles, he rose to the challenge.
And not only in remembering Abraham Lincoln, but we need the Library
to bring our documents together so that future scholars and, more
importantly, the children, who are trying to get a grasp of this
history, the Abraham Lincolns of the future, the Thomas Jeffersons of
the future, the Douglas MacArthurs of the future, that they can see how
America becomes great. America becomes great because the average men
and women of this Nation, the average Joes on the battlefield who win
the wars, those who wax philosophically and win the debates on the
floor, who pass monumental legislation, that all these people come from
the homes of the average citizens of this country. We need to continue
to inspire our children so that they too can rise up and be the great
leaders of this Nation.
Madam Speaker, I applaud the chairman of the committee, the gentleman
from Alaska (Mr. Young), for allowing this legislation to move forward.
I think it is in the best interest of our Nation and our children.
Madam Speaker, I submit the article referred to above hereafter:
[From the Chicago Tribune, May 31, 2000]
Was He or Wasn't He?--Deflating Lincoln to a Human Scale
Washington.--Abraham Lincoln was the humbly born, self-
educated ``Honest Abe,'' the Great Emancipator who freed the
slaves in America.
Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist, who said whatever
the crowd wanted to hear, freed hardly any slaves, used the
``N-word'' frequently and, if he had his druthers, would have
sent all blacks back to Africa.
Pick the history you prefer. Lerone Bennett Jr., prefers
the second interpretation of Lincoln and elaborates on it in
a 652-page assault, ``Forced Into Glory: Abraham Lincoln's
White Dream.''
With the Confederate battle flag re-emerging these days as
a lightning rod of controversy across the South (Is it a
symbol of racism or a benign tribute to southern heritage?),
Bennett, author, editor and acclaimed historian at Ebony
magazine, could hardly have picked a better time to question
another enduring symbol of the Civil War, Lincoln.
Bennett is not quite successful in his effort to convince
us that Lincoln was an unrepentant white supremacist or that
the Emancipation Proclamation was a ``ploy'' designed to
perpetuate slavery rather than extinguish it.
But Bennett effectively instructs a broader audience in
what Lincoln scholars have known all along, that Lincoln did
not really free the slaves as commonly believed. He also was
a more complicated man than the catchy slogans like Honest
Abe and the Great Emancipator adequately describe.
The Emancipation Proclamation, Bennett pints out, did not
free any slaves because it applied only to areas outside
Union control. As an Illinois legislator and congressman
before the Civil War, legislator and congressman before the
Civil War, Lincoln actually opposed abolitionists. He
supported the Fugitive Slave Act and supported Illinois'
laws barring blacks from voting, serving on juries,
holding office and intermarrying with whites.
Lincoln refused to free and arm slaves. He delivered anti-
slavery speeches in northern Illinois and pro-slavery
speeches in southern Illinois. Those who knew him well said
he enjoyed minstrel shows, used the N-word in private
conversations and sometimes in speeches.
Bennett's been here before. His 1968 Ebony article ``Was
Abe Lincoln a white supremacist?'' sent ripples across the
academic and cultural world of that politically volatile era.
Much of this has been written about by other scholars.
Bennett is not an academic historian. Yet his article, like
his classic work ``Before the Mayflower,'' brought scholarly
research to a broad audience and changed the national
conversation about the early history of African-Americans,
even among scholars.
As a descendant of African-American slaves, I appreciate
Bennett's critique, for the insights it offers--not just on
Lincoln but on those of us who admire and respect the impact
he had on my family and millions of others of all races.
Since I don't know what was in Lincoln's heart, I have to
judge him by his actions. Whether he intended to free the
slaves or not, his actions served to have that effect over
time.
He may not have been the Great Emancipator but he helped to
emancipate.
Yes, as Bennett describes, Lincoln did allow the four slave
states that remained in the Union to dictate his policy
toward slavery. But, can anyone familiar with geography blame
Lincoln for wanting to avoid secession by Maryland and
Delaware? It would have left the District of Columbia
surrounded by hostile states, which would not have been a
happy situation.
The Emancipation Proclamation did not free many slaves, but
it gave the Civil War a moral purpose that fended off
potential foreign allies to the South and set a new course
for American history.
Lincoln may have supported ``colonization'' of black slaves
to Africa, but he was hardly alone, either among white or
black leaders of the time. Yet, the proclamation
repudiated colonization, in so many words and enabled the
first large-scale enlistment of black soldiers in the
Union army.
Once he issued the proclamation. Lincoln no longer could
waffle on the slavery issue. His role as ``emancipator'' was
assured and he did nothing to discourage it.
Lincoln held off radical Republicans who wanted him to
further, but he also fended off reactionaries who wanted him
to move backward, to modify his proclamation or abandon it
altogether.
If Bennett overdoes his assault on Lincoln, it hardly
matches the overzealous ways in which ol' Abe has been almost
canonized over the years.
Like Thomas Jefferson and other heroic figures of American
history, Lincoln set a higher standard for human brotherhood
and sisterhood than even he was able to meet.
Still, we can admire Lincoln, as I still do, inasmuch as he
set that high standard during his better moments and acted on
it.
Lincoln is important, not only to Americans but around the
world, as a symbol of how an ordinary man from very humble
beginnings can rise to high office and lead his country
through its worst crisis, an all-out war against itself.
If he was ``forced into glory'' against his will or not, he
has worn the glory remarkably well.
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Madam Speaker, I have no further requests for time,
and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I said earlier that I was very excited to see this bill move forward,
but there were a number of questions that I had as we first brought
this up in the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands and the
Committee on Resources, which I believe have been very adequately
addressed.
Any American who follows Abraham Lincoln realizes that he is a legend
not only to Illinois but to many other States, and he has historic
sites around the country. I do not think there is a young boy in
America or a young girl in America who has not heard the story of
Abraham Lincoln reading by the firelight and being told by our parents
that we should be very appreciative of our life-styles, and how hard he
worked, and worked all day, and then read by the light of his fire.
Presumably he had very thick glasses, if they had been there at the
time, because he was so committed to that. It inspired many young
people, including myself. I have been a Lincoln fan most of my life,
have 15 to 20 books of Lincoln that I have read; and I think many
Americans have taken that inspiration.
When we walk through our capitol building or around the Nation's
capital, we see many Lincoln sites. The Gettysburg address is arguably,
along with the Declaration of Independence, is the most known and most
moving document. This book by Gary Wills is a tremendous book, talking
about, for example, the fact that it is amazing that an address this
important, referring to the Gettysburg address, and one that most of us
know and is so concise, at the same time the Gettysburg address does
not mention Gettysburg, it does not mention slavery, it does not
mention the union, and it does not mention the South. Yet he managed to
communicate his points in a moving way that still moves Americans
today.
He was a tremendous writer, in addition to being a person who could
unify and keep our country together. This capitol building would be
rent apart if we had not had a mild mannered man from the Midwest who
listened to the people, and spent much of his life listening, to try to
somehow keep a very divided North together, let alone manage his way
through the Civil War.
I say all that because this site could have been in Kentucky, a
national
[[Page H4600]]
presidential library. That is where he was born. It could have been in
Indiana. We have a national Lincoln boyhood site in southern Indiana.
We in Indiana like to say that Indiana made Lincoln and Lincoln made
Illinois. It also could be at Gettysburg, where he delivered this
address and where we have just taken sites into Federal possession, in
the Wills House, the cemetery where he gave the address. We have Ford
Theater as a national site.
But the fact is the first question is why Springfield. There are many
more Lincoln sites in Springfield than anywhere else in the country,
and I want to make sure the Record notes these. They have the Lincoln
Home National Historic Site, where he and Mary Todd Lincoln lived. The
Lincoln-Herndon Law Offices. They have the Lincoln tomb. The Lincoln
Depot, where he left Springfield for Washington, D.C., which is still
preserved. They have the Lincoln log cabin, where his father and
stepmother lived. They have the Lincoln ledger, his financial records.
The old State capitol where he served as a State legislator and
delivered his famous house divided speech. They also have outside of
Springfield and New Salem a recreation of a village of his time period.
There is no question that Springfield has more historic sites related
to Lincoln than anywhere else in the country. They also, through the
Henry Horner Collection that was given to the Illinois State Historical
Society, have 1,500 documents that were either handwritten by Lincoln
or were signed by Lincoln, in addition to all sorts of broadsides,
prints and photographs, including the earliest known photo of Lincoln,
taken in 1846, and the only known photo lying in state.
So, clearly, they have more documents, more photos, more actual
buildings related to Lincoln than anywhere else in the country. They
have Edward Everett's copy of his manuscript, handwritten out for him.
They have the handwritten speech of the second inaugural address with
the famous ``with malice toward none, with charity for all.''
I think there is a compelling case that, a, we need a national
Lincoln museum and library, and that Springfield should be the center.
One amendment that we had in committee, and I think is important as we
work with the National Park Service on things like the Lewis and Clark
trip to the West where we have many historic sites and where we have
other underground railroad sites; as we work together it is important
that a national museum, while it will focus on his Illinois years,
because that is where most of the documents are, that it will also
interrelate with the other Lincoln sites around the country. So as we
see this boom in heritage tourism, as many young Americans and adult
Americans try to learn more about their history, that they can go to
one site and at that site be referred to other sites around the country
that also bring out that heritage.
{time} 1430
I am excited about the efforts of the gentleman from Illinois (Mr.
Shimkus). I hope this also will continue to be funded through the
appropriations process, and I am glad that we can move this bill forth.
Mr. LaHood. Mr. Speaker, and the members of the House of
Representatives, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to
submit my testimony on an issue that is very important to me, and to
the 18th District of Illinois--authorization of the Abraham Lincoln
Presidential Library.
A panel of world-famous historians recently voted Abraham Lincoln as
the greatest American President. This comes as no surprise to those of
us from the Land of Lincoln. For decades, people from all over the
world have come to Illinois to learn about our 16th President, and to
be inspired by his life and words. Lincoln's story is the
quintessential American success story. In Lincoln, we have a man born
into the most humble of circumstances overcoming hardship and repeated
failures, through his own hard work and dedication, to emerge as one of
the three most written about individuals in human history.
But even though Lincoln is considered by the world to be one of the
nation's greatest leaders, there is no single location where the
Lincoln story can be told. There are sites that interpret his pioneer
days, has legal and political careers, his home life, and even his
death. But there is not a facility dedicated to interpreting Abraham
Lincoln's legacy and relevance to contemporary generations.
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., one of the nation's most respected
historians, recently termed it a ``tragedy'' that Abraham Lincoln does
not have a Presidential Library.
The State of Illinois has the world's largest Lincoln collection--
some 46,000 items so rare and valuable that the collection exceeds the
combined Lincoln holdings of the National Park Service, the National
Archives, and the Smithsonian Institution. Some of our nation's most
significant artifacts are a part of that collection: five copies of The
Gettysburg Address, which sets the stage for our nation's history after
Civil War; the only signed copy of The Emancipation Proclamation, which
echoed Lincoln's strong feelings against human bondage; and the only
copy of Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, which, while advocating
malice toward none and charity for all, predicted benevolent policies
for post war recovery. The Illinois collection also includes such
diverse artifacts as Tad Lincoln's toy cannon, Mary Lincoln's wedding
skirt, and the nameplate from the front door of Lincoln's Springfield
house--treasures that belong to all Americans.
But, few of you have ever seen these items, and there is a reason for
that. The State of Illinois has no adequate facilities to appropriately
display and interpret these items. They are kept locked in a vault
beneath the old State Capitol in downtown Springfield, to be brought
out only for important research or the occasional exhibit at another
location.
Abraham Lincoln's example of sacrifice for his ideals should not be
kept locked behind a vault door. Lincoln's message of freedom and
democracy should not be kept in obscurity in the basement of a
building. The life of America's greatest President should not be hidden
away from all but a select few.
The proposed Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library will be a beacon of
freedom for the entire world. Anyone enjoying the benefits of
democracy, and those who yearn to enjoy those benefits, will want to
come to this new facility. The world looks to Abraham Lincoln as the
highest example of freedom in a nation founded on that concept, and the
Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library will give the world a place to
learn about, and be inspired by, that example.
Abraham Lincoln's message is especially relevant today, as the
world's changing political situation has people searching for a
champion of freedom and equality. We have that champion. He is an
American who kept the United States united and demonstrated to the
world that democratic ideals were not a mere abstraction, but a living
reality. He is a human being who brought dignity to all human beings.
He is a martyr who died for his beliefs. He makes us proud to be
Americans. Now, it's time to return the favor.
Abraham Lincoln's legacy belongs to all generations. His appeal
transcends age, race, gender, class and partisan boundaries. He is one
of our greatest Presidents and deserves this long overdue facility in
his honor. It will be located in Springfield, Illinois, but it will be
open to the world. Let's keep Lincoln's torch of freedom burning for
all people. Let's help fund the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library.
Mr. SOUDER. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Biggert). The question is on the motion
offered by the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Souder) that the House
suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3084, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds having voted in favor
thereof) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________