You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to multiverse
Hi Guys,
the 0.2 release is nearing completion, and this means we have a basic
STM up and running.
So pojo based and reasonable performing (between 100.000 and a few
million transactions per second).
The big question is: what should be the goal of 0.3? What do you
think? What should we do to make it better. Which things can we do
that take the least amount of effort but provide the most value?
Performance?
Features?
Easier to use?
I have maintained a backlog so I don't forget anything.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to multiverse
> Performance?
> Features?
> Easier to use?
How about a small-to-medium sized sample application? Not so much for
demonstration as to discover which features are easy to use, which
hard, what would be very useful to have etc..?
ap
Peter Veentjer
unread,
Jun 11, 2009, 4:47:18 PM6/11/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to googlemu...@googlegroups.com
Hi Andrew,
good idea. I already have implemented some of the classic concurrency
examples to see how well the shoe fits, but if you have a good idea
for some real applications, I would be very happy!
janus
unread,
Jun 24, 2009, 9:02:45 AM6/24/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to multiverse
Peter,
Do you have specific date for the arrival of 0.2? And congrats for
your effort for far.
Janus
On Jun 11, 8:47 pm, Peter Veentjer <alarmnum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> good idea. I already have implemented some of the classic concurrency
> examples to see how well the shoe fits, but if you have a good idea
> for some real applications, I would be very happy!
>