Can I for a return value on a parameter?

[Chris F]

Say I'm mocking this function

void foo(const int inputVal, int& outputVal);

and the calling function is this

int input=0;
int output=0;
foo(input, output);

Can I force the outputVal to return a certain value with an ON_CALL macro? If so how? Thanks!

[Billy Donahue]

I think:

ON_CALL(*obj, foo(_,_)).SetArgReferee<1>(value)

[Billy Donahue]

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Billy Donahue <billyd...@google.com> wrote:

I think:

ON_CALL(*obj, foo(_,_)).SetArgReferee<1>(value)

Correction:

ON_CALL(*obj, foo(_,_))

    .WillByDefault(SetArgReferee<1>(value));

[Chris F]

Ok I'll try it. What "using ::testing::*;" does that fall under?

[Billy Donahue]

using ::testing::SetArgReferee;

[Chris F]

I get for some reason, and I added using ::testing::SetArgReferee.

error: 'class testing::internal::OnCallSpec<int(const char*, sqlite3**)>' has no member named 'SetArgReferee'

[Billy Donahue]

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Chris F <zil...@gmail.com> wrote:

I get for some reason, and I added using ::testing::SetArgReferee.

error: 'class testing::internal::OnCallSpec<int(const char*, sqlite3**)>' has no member named 'SetArgReferee'

CL and sponge link or it didn't happen.  :)

[Chris F]

:)

This is just a compile error, not run error. Thanks.