We're facing this after upgrading to gwt 2.0.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
On 8 дек, 19:24, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <lfpg....@gmail.com>
wrote:
As you can see in my case the problem is harder to identify since I
don't have ANY return type nor parameter directly extending list. The
list references come through aggregation. I understand that anyway the
serialization policy still has to take care of all types, no matter
whether they're direct return types or parameters, but I just want to
point out how this could become a more widespread issue.
On Dec 17, 5:26 pm, Al Murauski <a.murau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The same problem.
>
> We're facing this after upgrading to gwt 2.0.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> On 8 дек, 19:24, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <lfpg....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi.
> > We're using GWT 1.7 and I'm starting to experiment with 2.0 RC2 to
> > evaluate GWT.runAsync().
>
> > However, now as I compile the app, I get warning for deprecations in
> > all RPC methods which return collections. I guess it's because the
> > result is declared as java.util.Collection, and the deprecated
> > com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.*ListenerCollectionclasses extends
> until I stored the List object into a variable on the client.
I should have said: until in my client code I assigned the object of
type List to a variable declared as type List.
> and stored the resultant List<Foo> object into a variable on the client
Should read: and assigned the List<Foo> or List<Object> object to a
variable of type List<Foo> or List<Object>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
On Dec 8 2009, 6:24 pm, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez