However I have a general question about the DOCTYPE header directive in the various *.gwt.xml files.What is the good option among:a) these lines are useless because quirk/standard discussion is obsolete. Ok to remove?b) these lines have few effects, they are necessary, but the version reference 2.6 2.7 2.8... has absolutely no incidence. True?c) these lines are critical and with 2.8.x, they have to be updated to ... ???
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I saw there were some commits to master after RC2 was cut. Are there plans to cut an RC3 or just roll those commits into the GA?
"the fact that 2.8 will be maintained in parallel. (Jens) " !?!We would certainly appreciate to know more about this fact (announced? published? where?).
"the fact that 2.8 will be maintained in parallel. (Jens) " !?!We would certainly appreciate to know more about this fact (announced? published? where?).
As a matter of fact, if version 3.0 is in line with various statements read here and there on the web (disparition of widget library, disparition of RPC), we would certainly prefer version 2.8.x to any 3.dead versions !We think the 2.8 branches will continue to attract more developers than the 3.x branches.But in any case, the first need is a fair vision of the future of GWT. Something like an 'official' statement, or at least a target roadmap.
If both branches are maintained (hopefully), we suggest a better version naming. Version 3.0 should receive a radically different name, and version 3.0 should succeed to 2.8 on the 'classic' branch...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/udNQeQ6cK8A/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Philippe Gonze Address: Rue de la bruyère 12 / 1428 Lillois / BE Phone : 00.32.473580758 Skype : matscape www.gonze.org |
Hearing that 3.0 will be a "bundle", our key concern is "How many technologies should we (learn?) mix and organize to work together?".
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.getHeader(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;
(plus the stack trace)
as well as:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest.isAsyncStarted()Z
(plus the stack trace).
I'm assuming that these errors are caused by the fact that the codeserver in RC1 and RC2 requires Servlet 3.0 and I'm running (as part of the Google Plugin for Eclipse) jetty-6.1.x which provides Servlet 2.5.
What I don't understand is why is this setup working fine with gwt-2.8.0-beta1 but it is not working with gwt-2.8.0-rc1 or gwt-2.8.0-rc2.
Thanks for the help
Tony
What I don't understand is why is this setup working fine with gwt-2.8.0-beta1 but it is not working with gwt-2.8.0-rc1 or gwt-2.8.0-rc2.
Then, GWT RPC isn't a blocker for splitting your project (see my modular-webapp archetype at https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-archetypes)
@Override
public String[] weekdaysFull() {
return new String[] {
"воскресенье",
"понедельник",
"вторник",
"среда",
"четверг",
"пятница",
"суббота"
};
}
should be
@Override
public String[] weekdaysFull() {
return new String[] {
"понедельник",
"вторник",
"среда",
"четверг",
"пятница",
"суббота","воскресенье"
};
}Please fix this.
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.getHeader(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;"
on the codeserver.
I was convinced that I could rearrange the GWT/AppEngine dependencies in the IntelliJ module and
get it working, but that appears to not be the case. So I assume that to *run* them separately
would have to mean splitting the client and server sides into separate pom.xml within the project
and splitting the dependencies. Correct?
Thanks