GWT/Maven: No source code is available for type junit.framework.Test; did you forget to inherit a required module?

1,157 views
Skip to first unread message

Magnus

unread,
Jan 25, 2017, 1:18:21 PM1/25/17
to GWT Users
Hello,

I just moved a Java library, which uses GWT, into a Maven project.
The Maven project was created like this:

mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeArtifactId=maven-archetype-quickstart

Then, two code folders are created, main and test. I moved my library code into the main folder, and I created the mylib.gwt.xml file there.
The test folder created by the Maven template contains a file AppTest.java, which uses junit.

I imported the Maven project into eclipse and added it as a dependend project to an application project, which uses the library code.

Now, when I try to compile the application, I get this error:

Compiling module bcs.bcs
   Tracing compile failure path for type 'msw.lib.awi.AppTest'
      [ERROR] Errors in 'file:/home/warker/dvl/prj/msw-lib-awi/src/test/java/msw/lib/awi/AppTest.java'
         [ERROR] Line 26: No source code is available for type junit.framework.Test; did you forget to inherit a required module?
         [ERROR] Line 28: No source code is available for type junit.framework.TestSuite; did you forget to inherit a required module?
         [ERROR] Line 11: No source code is available for type junit.framework.TestCase; did you forget to inherit a required module?
   [ERROR] Aborting compile due to errors in some input files

What's going on here? Why does the GWT compiler see the test folder, allthough there is no *.gwt-xml file referencing it?
How can I resolve the problem?

Thanks
Magnus


Juan Pablo Gardella

unread,
Jan 25, 2017, 1:40:06 PM1/25/17
to GWT Users
I believe you don't want compile junit classes. 

         [ERROR] Line 26: No source code is available for type junit.framework.Test; did you forget to inherit a required module?
         [ERROR] Line 28: No source code is available for type junit.framework.TestSuite; did you forget to inherit a required module?
         [ERROR] Line 11: No source code is available for type junit.framework.TestCase; did you forget to inherit a required module?


Remove them from the src path that you instructed GWT to process. See an example at: http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/tutorial/create.html#components especially at module xml, where you define the source path.

Regards,
Juan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Magnus

unread,
Jan 25, 2017, 9:54:04 PM1/25/17
to GWT Users
Hello Juan!


On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 7:40:06 PM UTC+1, Juan Pablo Gardella wrote:
I believe you don't want compile junit classes. 

Remove them from the src path that you instructed GWT to process. See an example at: http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/tutorial/create.html#components especially at module xml, where you define the source path.


Thank you! No, I don't want to compile junit classes. But they are not in my path:

The library has these two folders:
  • src/main/java/msw/lib/awi
  • src/test/java/msw/lib/awi
The whole library code is below the first one and the only *.gwt.xml is:

src/main/java/msw/lib/awi.gwt.xml

It has the following contents:

  <module>
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/>
  <source path='awi'/>
 </module> 

Since this is the only *.gwt.xml file, I don't see where I should include the src/test/java/msw/lib/awi/AppTest.java, which uses junit.

I would like to understand, why the GWT compiler "sees" the AppTest.java file here?

Thank you
Magnus

Thomas Broyer

unread,
Jan 26, 2017, 2:15:34 AM1/26/17
to GWT Users
GWT doesn't care about folders, it reads resources from the classpath. And Eclipse does not have notions of "main" and test classpaths, so src/test/java is added to the classpath just like src/main/java. That said, a properly configured Eclipse+Maven+GWT project should configure GWT tasks to only include src/main/java. Things should also Just Work™ with Maven (I'd suggest getting Maven to work before Eclipse)

Magnus

unread,
Jan 26, 2017, 11:26:21 AM1/26/17
to GWT Users
Hello Thomas!

> I'd suggest getting Maven to work before Eclipse

Let me explain this:
I am in the middle of a migration of my code towards Maven. Before this, I had this situation:
  • a pure java library (lib-java)
  • a GWT-based java library (lib-gwt)
  • several applications which use both libraries (lib-java and lib-gwt)
In the first steps, I moved the two libraries to Maven. They compile fine and the target jar's are build.
The applications are still based on the GWT-plugin for eclipse, i. e. non-Maven projects.

GWT doesn't care about folders, it reads resources from the classpath.

But then I don't really understand the sense of the *.gwt.xml files, which explicitely include source folders.
 
And Eclipse does not have notions of "main" and test classpaths, so src/test/java is added to the classpath just like src/main/java.

But I only have included src/main/java in my *.gwt.xml file. If not the visibility to the GWT compiler, what else  does this mean then?
 
That said, a properly configured Eclipse+Maven+GWT project should configure GWT tasks to only include src/main/java.

How do I do that, while the application is still outsife of Maven?
(In eclipse I can only select dependend projects.)
 
Things should also Just Work™ with Maven (I'd suggest getting Maven to work before Eclipse)

As stated above, I am in the middle: The libraries are migrated to Maven and compile fine, while the applications are not yet.
My plan is to also move the applications to Maven. But first they should work in the intermediate step...

Thanks
Magnus
 

Thomas Broyer

unread,
Jan 26, 2017, 11:51:23 AM1/26/17
to GWT Users


On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 5:26:21 PM UTC+1, Magnus wrote:
Hello Thomas!

> I'd suggest getting Maven to work before Eclipse

Let me explain this:
I am in the middle of a migration of my code towards Maven. Before this, I had this situation:
  • a pure java library (lib-java)
  • a GWT-based java library (lib-gwt)
  • several applications which use both libraries (lib-java and lib-gwt)
In the first steps, I moved the two libraries to Maven. They compile fine and the target jar's are build.
The applications are still based on the GWT-plugin for eclipse, i. e. non-Maven projects.

GWT doesn't care about folders, it reads resources from the classpath.

But then I don't really understand the sense of the *.gwt.xml files, which explicitely include source folders.

No, they subset the classpath by defining subpackages, independently of where they come from (and they sort-of superset the classpath with super-source too).
Still, classpath/classloader based, not file/folder based.
 
That said, a properly configured Eclipse+Maven+GWT project should configure GWT tasks to only include src/main/java.

How do I do that, while the application is still outsife of Maven?
(In eclipse I can only select dependend projects.)

In the launch configuration, you should be able to tweak the classpath manually to remove the src/test/java entry (which should be independent from the "dependent projects")

Magnus

unread,
Jan 26, 2017, 10:07:16 PM1/26/17
to GWT Users
Hello Thomas,

I solved the actual problem by removing the Maven generated AppTest.java from the src/test/ path.
However, my further plans are concerned by what you mentioned below:


GWT doesn't care about folders, it reads resources from the classpath.
But then I don't really understand the sense of the *.gwt.xml files, which explicitely include source folders.
No, they subset the classpath by defining subpackages, independently of where they come from (and they sort-of superset the classpath with super-source too).
Still, classpath/classloader based, not file/folder based.

This means that the GWT compiler "sees" everything on the classpath, wether some subfolder is included as source code in some *.gwt.xml files or not.

At the moment, I have separate libraries, one for pure Java code and one for GWT-based Java code. I already thought about moving them into one library, where one subfolder contains the GWT-related code.
For this one "GWT-folder", this would mean:
  • Only the GWT-folder must be seen by the GWT-compiler, since the other code may not compile with it.
  • Only for the GWT-folder, the corresponding source code must be included into the library jar file.
Until now I thought I can do that by placing a *.gwt.xml file only for the GWT-folder, so that all other folders are simply not existing from the GWT's point of view.
But if I understand you right, all other folders would be included by the GWT-compiler, too. And I don't want to fix this by having special run configurations for all my applications.
The optimal solution for me would be: Include a single jar in an application project, and have both the pure Java libraries and the GWT-related libraries present in the application.

Can I do this or must I keep the both libraries separated?

Thank you very much!
Magnus


Thomas Broyer

unread,
Jan 27, 2017, 5:04:04 AM1/27/17
to GWT Users
You can totally do that, specifically because .gwt.xml files subset the classpath.

Recap:
1. GWT reads from the classpath, it doesn't care where the files "physically" are: this means if your classpath is src/main/java:target/classes:/path/to/gwt-user.jar:/path/to/gwt-dev.jar, you can have target/classes/myapp/MyApp.gwt.xml (in a typical Maven setup, copied there from src/main/resources/myapp/MyAp.gwt.xml) that references src/main/java/myapp/MyApp.java as simply "myapp.MyApp": GWT doesn't care whether that myapp/MyApp.java actually leaves in src/main/java, target/classes, some JAR, etc.
2. gwt.xml files subset the classpath for GWT: by default, a gwt.xml has an implicit <source path="client"/>, so putting a .gwt.xml file in a package and referencing it from another .gwt.xml (or passing it as the input to GWT) will tell GWT to only consider classes (in the form of *.java resources) in the "client" subpackage. A typical setup would put non-GWT classes in a "server" subpackage, and GWT generators into a "rebind" subpackage; GWT will then ignore them because they're not in the "source path" (which only includes the "client" subpackage here).
3. gwt.xml files can also "superset" the classpath by "rerooting" some subpackages, through super-source. If a .gwt.xml contains <super-source path="super"/>, the GWT will behave as if that "super" subpackage was added to the classpath (note that again this is about packages, whereas the classpath is defined in terms of folders and jar files; what that means is that if myapp/MyApp.gwt.xml from the above example had <super-source path="super"/>, then GWT would behave as if the classpath were src/main/java/myapp/super:target/classes/myapp/super:src/main/java:target/classes:<what would be equivalent to selecting myapp/super inside the gwt-user.jar>:/path/to/gwt-user.jar:<what would be equivalent to selecting myapp/super inside the gwt-dev.jar>:/path/to/gwt-dev.jar:<what would be equivalent to selecting the myapp/super inside the gwt-dev.jar> – well actually, the precedence rules are a bit different IIRC, but you get the idea)
4. the <source> and <super-source> (and <public> by the way) can further subset things by using includes="", excludes="" and skip="" attributes, or <include>, <exclude> and <skip> child elements (the difference between exclude and skip: skip means "not in this module, but another module –generally in the same package– could include it", whereas exclude means "never include this, even if another module –generally in the same package– would include it"; of course it only works that way if both modules are <inherited/>)

Have a look inside gwt-user.jar to understand all that: in one JAR there's client-side code, server-side code, shared client/server code, super-source code; and you can find further subsetting (using include/exclude/skip) in some .gwt.xml files in com/google/gwt/user.

Magnus

unread,
Jan 28, 2017, 11:08:36 AM1/28/17
to GWT Users
Hello Thomas,

thank you for all the explanations!
I took a look at gwt-user.jar. It looks very interesting. There are a lot of subfolders, where each one seems to be some sort of micro system, including several subfolrders with the common names ("client", "public", ...) as well as several *.gwt.xml files. I think, I'll look at it again...

However, it's hard for me to derive a minimalistic method for my goal: One maven project with two code bases, one for general java (or server-side) code, and one for GWT-related code.

I'd start with a new maven project "mylib", which is based on a simple archetype-quickstart maven stub, and I'd add two subfolders under src/main/java/mylib:
  • src/main/java/mylib/general
  • src/main/java/mylib/web
Then, I'd add the following file:

src/main/java/mylib/web.gwt.xml

...with the following content:

  <module>
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/>
  <source path='web'/>
 </module> 

Then, I'd include mylib.general.* for server-side code, and mylib.web.* for GWT-based code.

Would this be the right way?
Could I place server-side only code under general (e. g. database related code) and GWT-based code under web?
(I still feel that the GWT compiler then would "ignore" the code under the general folder, doesn't it?)

Thanks
Magnus

Jens

unread,
Jan 28, 2017, 11:24:56 AM1/28/17
to GWT Users

I'd start with a new maven project "mylib", which is based on a simple archetype-quickstart maven stub, and I'd add two subfolders under src/main/java/mylib:
  • src/main/java/mylib/general
  • src/main/java/mylib/web
Then, I'd add the following file:

src/main/java/mylib/web.gwt.xml

...with the following content:

  <module>
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/>
  <source path='web'/>
 </module> 

Then, I'd include mylib.general.* for server-side code, and mylib.web.* for GWT-based code.

Would this be the right way?
Could I place server-side only code under general (e. g. database related code) and GWT-based code under web?
(I still feel that the GWT compiler then would "ignore" the code under the general folder, doesn't it?)

That would work, as long as src/main/java/mylib or src/main/java/mylib/general is not exposed to GWT compiler by any other GWT module you might have. With the above only src/main/java/mylib/web would be analyzed and compiled by GWT compiler. Its basically the same as with using client, shared and server folder but the *.gwt.xml only makes the client and shared folder visible to the GWT compiler.

An alternative approach for library code is to not split the code up into distinct packages like you did but instead use an annotation and then build two different jar's (one that only contains GWT code, and another only containing code incompatible to GWT) by reading the annotation. That is basically the approach Guava uses to build guava.jar and guava-gwt.jar.

-- J.

Magnus

unread,
Jan 29, 2017, 1:23:35 AM1/29/17
to GWT Users
Hello Jens!

On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 5:24:56 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
  • src/main/java/mylib/general
  • src/main/java/mylib/web
src/main/java/mylib/web.gwt.xml

  <module>
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/>
  <source path='web'/>
 </module> 

That would work, as long as src/main/java/mylib or src/main/java/mylib/general is not exposed to GWT compiler by any other GWT module you might have.

I guess you mean having another *.gwt.xml file that reference some folder under /src/main/java/mylib/general?
 
Its basically the same as with using client, shared and server folder

I already noticed this naming convention, but where is it documented?
 
An alternative approach for library code is to not split the code up into distinct packages like you did but instead use an annotation and then build two different jar's (one that only contains GWT code, and another only containing code incompatible to GWT) by reading the annotation. That is basically the approach Guava uses to build guava.jar and guava-gwt.jar.

Sounds interesting. Where can I read about this?

Thank you
Magnus
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages