Register your company if you are using GWT

[Kanagaraj M]

If you are using GWT for your projects/products, please register it in the following link. so that we can see how many are using GWT.

http://gwtreferencelist.appspot.com/  

[Joseph Lust]

Kanagaraj,

Great idea! I've been searching for a list like this for some time. This will certainly help make the case for GWT usage for other companies/projects.

Could you add GAE to the hosting options, as well as Jetty and Weblogic? Also, my company is in the Health or Fitness industry, but neither are in your list.

Sincerely,

Joe

[Kanagaraj M]

Hi Joseph,

 I am not the one who developed that application. I have got it in a post.

http://pgt.de/2012/03/15/companies-using-google-web-toolkit/ 

Anyway i have requested owner of the site to look into this thread as well.

FYI, contact info for him  p...@pgt.de.

[P.G.Taboada]

Nice you liked it.
I was thinking in renaming Tomcat to JEE Webprofile, which would mean just webcontainer. So if you are using jetty feel free to tick tomcat, I will rename as soon as possible.

Concerning Weblogic just tick Oracle...  ;-)

There is "health and fitness" in the list...

Thanks for taking the time and contributing.

Kind regards,

Papick G. Taboada

[maticpetek]

Hello,

   For "Backend technology stack" you could also add mybatis. And congratulation - very good idea & application. 

Regards,
   Matic
------------------
GWT stuff twitter  - http://twitter.com/#!/gwtstuff

[Qrunk]

Hi Kanagraj,

Thanks for sharing such important information on GWT group ...

Cheers :-)

[Sarjith Pullithodi]

well, http://gwtreferencelist.appspot.com/ doesnt work well for me... using chrome/ubuntu

--
Sarjith
          

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/y7-do6aACcsJ.

To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

[Kanagaraj M]

working fine in chrome.

30+ companies added.

On Friday, 16 March 2012 11:50:57 UTC+5:30, Sarjith wrote:

well, http://gwtreferencelist.appspot.com/ doesnt work well for me... using chrome/ubuntu

--
Sarjith
          

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Qrunk <kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Kanagraj,

Thanks for sharing such important information on GWT group ...

Cheers :-)

On Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:21:24 UTC+5:30, Kanagaraj M wrote:

Hi Joseph,

 I am not the one who developed that application. I have got it in a post.

http://pgt.de/2012/03/15/companies-using-google-web-toolkit/ 

Anyway i have requested owner of the site to look into this thread as well.

FYI, contact info for him  p...@pgt.de.

On Thursday, 15 March 2012 19:57:02 UTC+5:30, Joseph Lust wrote:

Kanagaraj,

Great idea! I've been searching for a list like this for some time. This will certainly help make the case for GWT usage for other companies/projects.

Could you add GAE to the hosting options, as well as Jetty and Weblogic? Also, my company is in the Health or Fitness industry, but neither are in your list.

Sincerely,

Joe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/y7-do6aACcsJ.

To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

[P.G.Taboada]

Thank you very much for the feedback. 

Just looked, working fine from here.  Does it still not work for you? Could you refresh/ reload the page?

On Friday, March 16, 2012 7:20:57 AM UTC+1, Sarjith wrote:

well, http://gwtreferencelist.appspot.com/ doesnt work well for me... using chrome/ubuntu

--
Sarjith
          

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Qrunk <kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Kanagraj,

Thanks for sharing such important information on GWT group ...

Cheers :-)

On Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:21:24 UTC+5:30, Kanagaraj M wrote:

Hi Joseph,

 I am not the one who developed that application. I have got it in a post.

http://pgt.de/2012/03/15/companies-using-google-web-toolkit/ 

Anyway i have requested owner of the site to look into this thread as well.

FYI, contact info for him  p...@pgt.de.

On Thursday, 15 March 2012 19:57:02 UTC+5:30, Joseph Lust wrote:

Kanagaraj,

Great idea! I've been searching for a list like this for some time. This will certainly help make the case for GWT usage for other companies/projects.

Could you add GAE to the hosting options, as well as Jetty and Weblogic? Also, my company is in the Health or Fitness industry, but neither are in your list.

Sincerely,

Joe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/y7-do6aACcsJ.

To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

[P.G.Taboada]

Thanks. I once did add every single option possible, and people stopped filling in because I was asking too much. Here I am doing it exactly the other way around. Just asking for great and mainstream, to provide a few fancy charts.

I am already asking too much, lots of people not entering data at all. But I am VERY thankful the reference list is growing. The chars are absolutely secondary and just eye candy.

[Joseph Lust]

Kanagaral,

I added a section to the GWT Wikipedia page on enterprise usage of GWT. I wrote up what I thought to be the salient features that made my employer choose it as our strategic technology choice. Feel free to add any other reasons, or examples you might think of (and add any translations if you like).

Also, anyone else in GWT community chime in too. Frankly I find GWT far more powerful than many other existing frameworks, yet many developers are unaware of this and choose not to use it. I think it is critical for us to promulgate its strengths. Hopefully burnishing this article will give COO's a justification for GWT usage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Web_Toolkit#Enterprise_Usage

Sincerely,

Joseph

[Thomas Broyer]

I'm not sure Java makes it any easier to unit-test than JS. Node.js and other similar "standalone JS runners" (V8, SpiderMonkey, etc.), or things like http://code.google.com/p/google-js-test/ make it quite easy to write and run unit-tests too; and there are tools to run them in HtmlUnit or real browsers if you need (just like GWTTestCase). They are just different tools because JS is a different technology than Java, but I don't think ones make it "easier" than the others. It might be easier for you you if you have a Java background, but that's about you then, not about the tools per se.

[Joseph Lust]

Touche,

Perhaps that line had too much Java love on it. I based that on my experience of writing some quite elaborate pure JS applications for the two years in ExtJs (backed by Struts) before moving to GWT. In those applications (100K+ Js lines) it was just a serious pain that there was:

• No type checking, classes (can be emulated), or interfaces.
• No compiler (you can use the YUI tools, but that is just a compressor. Closure is a error generator for legacy code bases. )
• No compiler/package/import structure to ensure each page had the correct resources automatically.
• No simple testing structure to automatically run unit tests and collect reports while running inside an emulated browser (i.e. w/ TC or Maven).
• Discovery of issues (i.e. missing CSS class or image, improperly nested ']' ) before running application.
• JS debuggers, while they've come a long way, still don't compare with GWT's Eclipse/browser debugging integration (i.e. Firebug debugger continues to have wonky behavior).

I guess I should rephrase "easier than," but I still think that working in pure JS requires a bespoke, piecemeal toolchain which is more complex to utilize and less feature rich than an out of the box Eclipse+GWT setup. Does anyone else have anything to add to make the case that GWT should be used in WebApps?

Sincerely,

Joseph

[Lindomir Avelar]

Arcos, Brazil. Developping a vehicle tracking system