G+ sucks and blows (at least for some of us)
Brad Guth
Brad Guth
Brad Guth
G+ apparently doesn't understand, that when it comes to the once simple and efficient HTML or basic text format of essentially accomplishing a public email format that's stacked into and/or along with their global version of accessing Usenet and its various newsgroups, of which G+ is no longer simple, nor efficient and it's certainly not nearly as user format and context friendly.
Good job team Google, as in way to go at finally trashing a perfectly good thing, as to what Usenet/newsgroups used to be as something relatively easy, efficient and uncluttered (of minimal or no commercial context) to follow, track or search and otherwise contribute whatever in spite of all the usual gauntlet of its naysayers and FUD-masters doing all they can, as to topic/author stalk in order to trash as many others as possible, as well as G+ essentially fortifying their insider policy of keeping K-12s and most others away from reading or much less using any public unmoderated forums of sharing the truly independent context that Usenet/newsgroups used to represent. PRISM, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and Hitler should be so proud of you guys and gals of Google Groups Plus(GGP or G+), though perhaps their G+ symbol should be replaced with a cute little G swastika.
Only by keeping each G+ message/topic as simple and otherwise context and reply limited can the general public continue to interact with the less fortunate members of humanity that don't have or simply can’t afford access to any fast DSL or better channels, and they certainly don't have the best of personal computers either, but then supposedly that's not Google's fault unless their butt-load of pretentious arrogance counts.
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:48:47 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Brad Guth
No doubt whatsoever, that this time Google Groups+ version of accessing and contributing to Usenet/newsgroups has taken another wrong turn, thereby making other options such as using Thunderbird by Mozilla that others have already specified as the next best alternative to G+.
Once again, team G+ is attempting to make each and every
feature of their global internet domination service into yet another
do-everything app, as though everyone has to be connected by circles upon
circles to everyone else, along with hosting loads of other complex media apps
and accepting their usual tracking methods and/or allowing of most anything
contrived of bandwidth sucking bloatware features as being all-inclusive or
rather all-intrusive and even essential in order for it all to work. In
other words, do it our social-media fancy way, or else.
G+ apparently doesn't understand, that when it comes to the once simple and
efficient HTML or basic text format of essentially accomplishing a public email
format that's stacked into and/or along with their global version of accessing
Usenet and its various newsgroups, of which G+ is no longer simple, nor
efficient and it's certainly not nearly as user format and context friendly
unless you have at least a fast DSL and a reasonably newish computer, or don’t
care how much wireless or cellular bandwidth and its cost is racking up.
Good job team Google, as in way to go at finally trashing a perfectly good
thing, as to what Usenet/newsgroups used to be as something relatively easy,
efficient and uncluttered (of minimal or no commercial context) to follow,
track or search and otherwise contribute whatever in spite of all the usual
gauntlet of its naysayers and FUD-masters doing all they can, as to
topic/author stalk in order to trash as many others as possible, as well as G+
essentially fortifying their insider policy of keeping K-12s and most others
away from reading or much less using any public unmoderated forums of sharing
the truly independent context that Usenet/newsgroups used to represent.
PRISM, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and Hitler should be so proud of you guys and gals
of Google Groups Plus(GGP or G+), though perhaps their G+ symbol should be
replaced with a cute little G swastika.
Only by keeping each G+ message/topic as simple and otherwise context and reply limited can the general dumbfounded and typically snookered public continue to interact with others and the less fortunate members of humanity that don't have or simply can’t afford access to any fast DSL or better channels, and they certainly don't have the best of personal computers to work with either, but then supposedly that's not Google's fault unless their butt-load of pretentious arrogance counts, along with whatever those Bilderbergs and Rothschilds have to say.
Being forced and/or limited as to using only the G+ method of interacting with their new and improved messy look of Usenet/newsgroups that slugs can outrun, is somewhat like intellectual waterboarding, whereas eventually you just give up and do exactly as you’re told, or else it gets worse. The fully moderated version of G+ clients accessing and posting context into Usenet/newsgroups is essential, even if it purely robotic as based upon key-words or because of some nondisclosure context that NSA/PRISM flagged.
The collective social/political/economic disparity that’s growing between those of our rich and powerful insiders and those of the middle-class poor as discontent outsiders, is perhaps what’s driving the underlying issue of holding onto the likes of such remote labor/incarceration camps as Gitmo (Guantanamo Bay) that was illegally seized by US forces to begin with, is unfortunately exactly what the Bilderberg and Rothschild oligarchs had always intended.
After all, when they eventually round up another hundred million of as having been tracked and spied upon by the cloud of PRISM and otherwise profiled by their internet media co-conspirators, as per our having been interpreted as potential home grown national security threats because we don’t appreciate being their brown-nosed minions and forever in debt due to the artificial inflation and other disparity issues they’ve created for us, is why they’ll need the likes of having Gitmo as well as a dozen other large scale internment/work camps that would otherwise put a very large smile on Hitler’s face (not that he was ever truly in charge of his mostly Zionist oligarchs).
G+ is actually a civilian version of PRISM, with loads of commercial interest and stealth marketing skulduggery that would put those Nigerians to shame.
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:48:47 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Brad Guth
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:48:47 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Brad Guth
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Usenet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-usene...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Brad Guth / 253-8576061
Brad Guth
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:48:47 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Brad Guth
Brad Guth
Who says the NWO isn’t upon us, and bearing down?
I'm using this direct email method only because Google gmail access to "usenet.google.com" is in the toilet again, and has been dysfunctional for quite some time. Obviously a few team Google insiders have been in on this, as otherwise this type gmail dysfunction (especially to their very own @usenet.google.com account) would have been easily resolved as of a couple days ago, and the culprit hackers located and terminated dead in their tracks.
Anytime our resident redneck FUD-masters(GOP or otherwise) get their way, it ruins it for everyone else. Of course warlords highly depend upon their brown-nosed minions doing the right thing by way of trashing our public newsgroups, as well as topic/author stalking, profiling and bashing our context of any interpretations of whatever’s happening, for all they can muster.
Remember that there’s no policing of their remorseless kind, because we can be cut off with the mere flip of a switch by simply cutting off or diverting our access to @usenet.google.com, so that posting topics or replies are simply not going through or much less showing up anywhere.
NSA and CGHQ have their inside fiber optic channels plus encryption keys to all mail servers (including those of Google), and they still have their self imposed authority to do as they please. Snowden offered only the dirty tip of this NSA/CGHQ iceberg, because the other 90+% remains as hidden and nondisclosure rated.
If team Google (aka gmail Usenet/newsgroups “@usenet.google.com”) can’t manage to quickly resolve this issue, imagine what the NWO should be capable of getting away with as much mainstream media infomercials and infowar skulduggery crap of spamming us with their disinformation as much as they please.
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:48:47 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: