Until Google Groups can fix their dysfunctional version of Usenet, post whatever topics here

36 views
Skip to first unread message

Brad Guth

unread,
Jun 27, 2011, 10:43:30 PM6/27/11
to Google Usenet
This is just a plan-B kind of alternative Usenet that's public
accessible from anywhere in the world, so have at it.

herbert glazier

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 9:43:39 AM7/31/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
Can you BG email me at herbert...@gmail.com,and let me know what its all about. Thanks TreBert

herbert glazier

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 9:47:59 AM7/31/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
BG its herbert...@gmail.com  thanks again

Brad Guth

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 11:00:51 AM7/31/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
Hi there,
Apparently the GOP/ZNR hackers and FUD-masters have us exactly where
they want us. However, Usenet/newsgroups is actually functional
outside of using Google Groups, and with a little help you can get
back into updating newsgroup topics via "nntp.aioe.org" using
something like Outlook Express.

Their causing the dysfunction of such a vast global network of public
newsgroups is a first essential step in any NWO. Consider this as
another practice or dry run just to see what level of communications
disruption results can be obtained.

It seems our resident GOP/ZNRs and their fellow redneck KKK
FUD-masters are being restricted to Usenet, perhaps because they'd be
arrested for multiple hate and terrorism crimes if they ever expressed
themselves or acted in public.

Their close-nit social/political and faith-based community of
help-thy-self rage, bigotry and vengeance as to creating and
sustaining social and racial disparity plus otherwise promoting ethnic
cleansing has been quite obvious to myself as of 11 years ago when I'd
offered an honest opinion and shared the best available look-see at
what the nearby planet Venus had to offer. It is clear that the
highest authority in NASA and within all other government agencies
(including DARPA and otherwise all faith-based authority) fully
approves of their actions, so there's really no telling what sorts of
dastardly deeds they've been doing to others all along, especially
considering their serial topic/author stalking and bashings they've
been doing to the rest of us.

Unfortunately, most K12s and even higher educated folks simply do not
even know of Google Groups or much less realize this version of their
Usenet/newsgroups even exist. It’s only the less than 0.1% of
Americans that are less snookered and independently smart enough to
realize there’s even such a public forum and global community of
newsgroups for publishing and/or replying on behalf of pretty much
anything we might have to say.
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?hl=en&sel=usenet%3Dalt
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/topics?hl=en&ie=UTF-8
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?hl=en&sel=usenet%3Dsci
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/topics?hl=en&ie=UTF-8

The efforts of GOP/ZNR redneck FUD-masters like BDK, HVAC, Hagar and
their rabbi Saul Levy is kinda obvious, and especially troublesome
since they never police their own kind is a Mafiosi status-quo policy
that goes way back. I’m sure Warhol and William Mook would agree and
could provide multiple research links in support of what I’m telling.
The few good politicians and honest faith-based types are simply too
few and far between, as well as being kept just outside the mainstream
inner loop of true global power and authority, so they’re kind of
passive and worthless to us...

In the mean time, use either of my own Usenet accounts "Guth-Usenet"
or "Google-Usenet", because at least for the moment they have been
unaffected. As far as I know, the whole world can read whatever
topics or replies we post.

http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Brad Guth

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 12:04:57 PM7/31/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
I'm not convinced Google isn't part of the big picture. They simply can't
possibly not realize what's happening and how this global disruption
to our public communications is so NWO.

In the mean time, use either of my own Usenet accounts "Guth-Usenet"
or "Google-Usenet", because at least for the moment they have been

unaffected. As far as I know, the whole world can still read whatever
topics or replies we care to post.

http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

American

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 4:30:24 PM7/31/11
to Google Usenet
Seeing that even seemingly unrelated posts to what's
going on with the debt crisis might have an effect on what
could be discussed as a solution, rather than an exacer-
bation of the problem, what a better place than G. Groups for
a national forum on the subject.... but where does the truth
begin?

No one dare mention that shutting down G.Groups has any-
thing to do with adversity regarding talk about the debt
ceiling, now would they??? After all, citizens are never entitled
to have an opinion where illegal bailouts, bad loans, and
ponzi schemes are the order of the day, especially when
those in the transnationalist banking establishment don't
(or won't) reinvent themselves LOCALLY with new ideas
and greater numbers of small business entrepreneurships
at home, but will SURE SELL AMERICA SHORT when it
comes to REINVENTING THE WHEEL OF INDUSTRY
internationally!!

I wrote in the science.space.policy forum on 7/30/11, but
saw after I had posted the message that G. Groups was
down again. The topic was:

Electromagnetic Fields, what are they...really?

Jonathan wrote:

> As a cloud (light) [field] doesn't vary in speed, it either exists
> or it doesn't.

> The hypersensitivity, or the speed of light, is created analogous
> to the interaction between a photon and an eye. When the eye
> moves in response to a photon, how fast does is that motion?
> Do all the parts of the eye move at the very same time and
> speed? Instantaneously?

> This hypersensitivity, or the speed of light, happens whenever
> a system stands poised at the transition point /between/states.
> Water held at the boiling point, but not quite.
> A cloud. A field. A thought.

The speed of light is not so much a barrier as it is a maximum
speed of energy exchange. IMO that energy exchange increases
when there exists, or has been made to exist, a spin
harmonization between all elements exposed or immersed
in the environment they find themselves in.

Ultimately (talking hypertranslation here), total spin harmon-
ization or a totality of resonance of the system will IMO
create its own space-time bubble universe, similar to having
one frequency that contains the harmonics of all of the
elements of the system intact—so that the speed of light
"barrier" or "limit", is no more "c", than an aetheristic
saturation point. This saturation point, or limit of energy
exchange is between components either in or out of
harmonic resonance with each and every element of the
body defined: a wave packet containing all of the elemental
system harmonics—some in repetition and some not.

But what about human hypertranslation? IMO the key here
is almost physiological, with the exception that humans are
more motivated to be truth-seekers than they are non-
truth seekers. Why? Because it is inherent in their instinct
to survive, so that "truth's cause" always wins out in the end.

It might be fair to say that to admit on some "wholistic nature"
of cause and effect" can be scientifically observed (for
measurement purposes) only once, because any further
process of observation not only compromises the integrity
of the wiggle room or "trembling" in the non-objective
sense, but by creating an increase in the bipolar nature
of cause and effect, the "opbserver" seeks only to magnify
one self against the other self—in other words—THE
INGRATIATION OF SELF/SELVES should never, ever
become tolerated when actively engaging in the wholistic
approach, while in the FTL transiting process.

Anti-Christ is anti-growth and anti-selfm organization. Like
rules for disorder, anything that can be rhetorized, ends
up being vague and subjective, just like our debt crisis
that failed to agree on the very first proposal of cut, cap,
and balance the federal deficit. The spirit of vagueness and
subjectivity also "trivializes" ones true scientific inquiry
process, so much so that even small start-ups that were
bound to revolutionize both our energy and transportation
industries, both on the ground, in the air, orbitally, trans-
orbitally, and even interstellar, have "trivialized" the scientific
inquiry process, to the point that FUD tactics become
the status-quo version of scientific communication.

American

"The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive,
not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day
vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous."

—quote from "V for Vendetta" (2006)

Brad Guth

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 5:20:28 PM7/31/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
What about all the trillions upon trillions of intelligent other folks
being consumed by that 12e9 ly distant quasar galaxy that's supposedly
sucking up thousands of solar systems per year (perhaps a thousand per
day), and otherwise supposedly surrounded by all of that cosmic water?

I can almost hear their screams for help. Where the hell are those
Seans when they need them?

The demise of that old quasar galaxy is about as bad as any creation
and subsequent evolution oops tends to get. Did they all deserve to
die?

I'm not convinced that photons even move, but instead interact with
the matrix of what this universe is a very small part of.

herbert glazier

unread,
Aug 1, 2011, 6:57:51 AM8/1/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
I post photons move at c,and never slow down,but are absorbed by low energy electrons,and released when they have more energy that they need. Its another balancing act.  TreBert

Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 1, 2011, 3:32:32 PM8/1/11
to Google Usenet
In which case the original photon needs to only reach or move to the
first available electron. We're talking of moving or propagating as
little as one Planck distance, and each successive new photon does the
same.

The electron by electron form of a photon propagation would help to
explain why there's a maximum photon velocity perception.
On Aug 1, 3:57 am, herbert glazier <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I post photons move at c,and never slow down,but are absorbed by low energy
> electrons,and released when they have more energy that they need. Its
> another balancing act.  TreBert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about all the trillions upon trillions of intelligent other folks
> > being consumed by that 12e9 ly distant quasar galaxy that's supposedly
> > sucking up thousands of solar systems per year (perhaps a thousand per
> > day), and otherwise supposedly surrounded by all of that cosmic water?
>
> > I can almost hear their screams for help.  Where the hell are those
> > Seans when they need them?
>
> > The demise of that old quasar galaxy is about as bad as any creation
> > and subsequent evolution oops tends to get.  Did they all deserve to
> > die?
>
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:30 PM, American <samuelran...@comcast.net>

herbert glazier

unread,
Aug 1, 2011, 9:12:29 PM8/1/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
It was just a matter of time,that Google would end up like  USA press. I mentioned the Mafia in vain.   My particle spin theory answers where photons get to c. TreBert

herbert glazier

unread,
Aug 1, 2011, 9:19:44 PM8/1/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
I'll keep up with this mail best I can,and just do lots of sailing. TreBert

Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 2, 2011, 4:25:08 PM8/2/11
to Google Usenet

On Aug 1, 6:12 pm, herbert glazier <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It was just a matter of time,that Google would end up like  USA press. I
> mentioned the Mafia in vain.   My particle spin theory answers where photons
> get to c. TreBert

You mean where photons get slowed down to c.

Gravity is still worth at least 2c.

Those hacking into Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups and
systematically trashing it are likely well known to team Google.

herbert glazier

unread,
Aug 5, 2011, 3:40:21 AM8/5/11
to google...@googlegroups.com
Hi Brad  Late postings shown are from July 1  Looks to me like Google groups have shut down. It relates to free press. How say you  Bert

Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 5, 2011, 5:28:56 PM8/5/11
to Google Usenet

On Aug 5, 12:40 am, herbert glazier <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Brad  Late postings shown are from July 1  Looks to me like Google groups
> have shut down. It relates to free press. How say you  Bert
>

I say Google Groups is somehow in on it. If I can manage my personal
version of a public accessible Usenet/newsgroup with no problems
whatsoever (as hosted by a Google server), and I can thereby read your
stuff and contribute as much as I like, as well as I can otherwise
allow or block/exclude whomever is posting weird or inappropriate
crap, well then, so can the regular Google Groups version of accessing
all other public Usenet/newsgroups.

Obviously it takes the approvals and expertise of team Google in order
to cause such a dysfunctional situation. Google is allowing this
Usenet/newsgroup dysfunction to persist much longer than necessary,
and especially if "aioe.org" isn't dysfunctional kinda proves that
it's only the Google Groups version that's not updating our topics or
replies.

So, create and/or copy whatever topics over to this one, and keep
right on going. Using "aioe.org" if necessary in order to read and
post directly into all those other regular public newsgroups.

At least I'm offering a Google Groups channel of "free press" that
seems to be updating whatever topics quite nicely, and I can even
exclude or banish whatever GOP/ZNR rednecks and fellow FUD-masters
should they bother to show up.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages