Antiprotons exist

[Brad Guth]

We’re surrounded by antiprotons:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-antiproton-belt-earth.html

So where are all the positrons hiding?

[Brad Guth]

"Because of the earth’s magnetic field, physicists suggest there
actually exist two such radiation belts covering the planet, the outer
and inner. The outer belt should be comprised of lighter particles
such as positrons, while the inner belt would consist of much larger
particles, such as antiprotons because the force of gravity would be
able to hold them in."

[Brad Guth]

If we’re surrounded by antiprotons: So where are all the positrons
hiding?
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-antiproton-belt-earth.html

"Because of the earth’s magnetic field, physicists suggest there
actually exist two such radiation belts covering the planet, the
outer
and inner. The outer belt should be comprised of lighter particles
such as positrons, while the inner belt would consist of much larger
particles, such as antiprotons because the force of gravity would be
able to hold them in."

How could our NASA/Apollo era have missed any of this? (didn’t the
physics exist way back then?)

Btw; at least my "Google-Usenet" and " Guth-Usenet" accounts are
still fully functional and for the moment they remain open to the
public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

[American]

"The Van Allen radiation zone consists of rapidly moving charged
particles trapped in the earth's magnetic field. Most of the fastest
particles are electrons, although the inner part of the Van Allen
layer contains high energy protons as well. The particles in the inner
region are moving with speeds far greater than those in the outer one.
Some are moving with energies as great as those possessed by electrons
that have been accelerated through an electric field of over 10^9
volts...

The origin of the trapped particles is not known with certainty. It
seems likely, however, that the outer region consists mostly of
particles captured from the "wind" of corpuscular radiation from the
sun. It has been suggested that the protons and electrons in the inner
region may be produced in interactions between molecules of the
earth's atmosphere and cosmic rays."

—Exploration of the Universe, 4th edition, George O. Abell, Saunders
College Publishing, Ch. 15.3 The Earth's Magnetism, The External Field
and Van Allen Layer, p. 279

The neutron + positron -> proton + anti-electron neutrino reaction
looks interesting, especially when the e-neutrino further decays into
KAON and MUON neutrinos, which according to some scientists, affect
weather behavior, including earthquakes, and volcanoes... but I
digress. The e-neutrino has been associated with longitudinal FTL
waves, as Tesla had suggested (Colorado Springs experiments after
1899). The wavelength of these "non-hertzian", longitudinal waveforms
range from 100,000 km. to 1,000 km., with a frequency of 3 to 300 Hz.—
so if the upper atmosphere is receiving massive amounts of FTL
transmissions, then positronic activity might be highest in the outer
belt—however since positronic activity is also influenced by solar
activity (corpuscular radiation), there is a noise content to deal
with.

Perhaps in a way that modulates the level of inner belt anti-protons,
in order for the outer belt to "manufacture" an outer belt FTL signal
reception of positronic nature, creates the ELF signal that woukld be
under the 30 Hz range for interstellar reception.

American

"It may be said with a degree of assurance that not everything that
meets the eye is as it appears."

- Rod Serling

[American]

If e-neutrinos can modulate the upper and lower portions of
the Van Allen belt, then they (sure as hell) are modulating
from the earth's core:

http://iris.lib.neu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=physics_fac_pubs&sei-redir=1#

Any chance that we're recieving more of these e-neutrinos from
the core as opposed to the sun?

"Modulations will occur whenever the neutrino beam from
the Sun is parallel (or anti parallel) to the neutrino beam
from the Earth’s core."

American

"A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and
falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of
its people."

- John F. Kennedy

On Aug 5, 5:50 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Brad Guth]

On Aug 6, 11:56 am, American <samuelran...@comcast.net> wrote:
> If e-neutrinos can modulate the upper and lower portions of
> the Van Allen belt, then they (sure as hell) are modulating
> from the earth's core:
>

> http://iris.lib.neu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=phys...

>
> Any chance that we're recieving more of these e-neutrinos from
> the core as opposed to the sun?
>
> "Modulations will occur whenever the neutrino beam from
>  the Sun is parallel (or anti parallel) to the neutrino beam
>  from the Earth’s core."
>
> American
>
> "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and
>  falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of
>  its people."
>
>  - John F. Kennedy
>

Not all that sure about those neutrinos, however I'm quite sure that
our republic should be very afraid of those controlling governments
all around this world.

Semites have been celebrating like crazy. Go figure.

[American]

American soil will always remain American soil.

The "controlling" governments that you may be alluding
to are not so much "controlling" as they are manipulating,
as long as the wheel of antiquated industry can spin faster
and faster, reinventing itself with every rotation of earth-
bound incumbantism. Give credit to where credit is due:
Those who sell their soul to the Lord of the Air will also
lose it to the God of Creation.

Acts 2:16 (1611 KJV), as spoken of by the apostle Paul, says:

"But this is that which was spoken by the Prophet Ioel,

followed later by Acts 2:21:

And it shall come to passe, that whosoeuer shall call on the

Name of the Lord, shalbe saued.

Paul was referring to Joel 2:32 (1611 KJV), which says:

"And it shall come to passe that whosoeuer shall call on the
Name of the Lord, shall bee deliuered: for in mount Zion and in
Ierusalem shalbe deliuerance, as the Lord hath said, and in
the remnant, whom the Lord shall call."

The NAME Joel was referring to was YHWH. (There
was NO scripture to refer to by the apostle Paul, after Christ
was taken up in a cloud at the Mount of Olives. The early
assembly had nothing to base their testimony about either
the resurrection or ascension of Christ, other than to listen
and emblazon in their hearts the last words of the Messiah:

"Goe ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them
in the Name of the Father, and of the Sonne, and of the holy
Ghost: Teaching them to obserue all things, whatsoeuer I
haue commanded you: and loe, I am with you alway, euen
vntothe end of the world. Amen."

- Matthew 28:19 (1611 KJV)

This WAS the God of Heaven and earth, and anything
that happens elsewhere on the planet will have absolutely
nothing to do with what happens to the entire earth, from afar.

And alluding to the word "afar", we have the far field component
—namely superluminal ELF waves, which affect not only our
perceptions, but our magnetic field and earth core as well!

IMO that's why we're observing things from a distance only,
from the perspective of what the prophets foretold about
the return of YHWH to earth, because the entire species could
never deal with the blinding light of YHWH's presence!

IMO Longitudinal waves from light years distance DO affect
local phenomenon, and it will continue to affect the local
phenomenon, and be an example of the power from Heaven, to
those who remain in disbelief, and in their own little worlds of
money and power.

In other words Brad, America is not just about drawing
OUR line in the sand—it is about holding to the principles
of why OUR line was drawn in the first place—to have a
sanctuary that was free from the tyranny of the worship
of tyrants, false gods, and the evil mechanizations of things
like the NWO. These things are happening to us close up,
in our face, and they are slowly becoming an affront to YHWH.

IMO that's why we're observing things from a distance only,
from the perspective of what the prophets foretold about
the return of Christ to earth, because the entire species could
never deal with the blinding light of YHWH's presence—He
is sending His messenger back to us—just in time, and
to put an end to the chaos of the beast and the false prophet!

American

"Only those who want everything done for them are bored."

- Billy Graham

(And they're not only bored, but boring as well!)

[Brad Guth]

I'm alluding to those outside of government that are in charge of most
all the important stuff.

Haven't you bothered to read anything of what William Mook and a few
others have had to say?

The only line in the sand is drawn in our own blood by the Rothschilds
and a few others we do not elect.

Government and corporate corruption is off-the-hook, so to speak, and
there's still nothing constructive being done about it because one
thing lead to another that they also don't want any of us to know
about. There is no sanctuary for our republic as it was intended,
because our Nation has been run by the GOP/ZNR redneck Mafia
Rothschild kind from the very get-go. The average American no longer
servers any purpose unless they do and think only exactly as they are
told.

>
> IMO that's why we're observing things from a distance only,
> from the perspective of what the prophets foretold about
> the return of Christ to earth, because the entire species could
> never deal with the blinding light of YHWH's presence—He
> is sending His messenger back to us—just in time, and
> to put an end to the chaos of the beast and the false prophet!
>
> American
>
> "Only those who want everything done for them are bored."
>
>  - Billy Graham
>
> (And they're not only bored, but boring as well!)
>

Btw; even though Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is still
dysfunctional and no sign of recovery since July 25, at least my

"Google-Usenet" and " Guth-Usenet" accounts are still fully functional

and for the moment they are open to the public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en

[American]

Engineering the demise of the U.S. credit rating by shifting
the responsibility of bad borrowing onto the wealthy, is an
economic game changer, and it is happening right before our
very eyes, and it's happening right in what's left of the private
industry, right in midstream.

If the Fed floods the futures market with "buy orders" for
S&P futures, making it look like there is a lot of activity, it will
have the effect of turning the market in a totally illusive rebound.

There is absolutely nothing stimulative about this economy—
it is entirely manipulation, smoke, and mirrors, when the
government is forced by this regime into holding all the cards.

Progress of the scientifically intuitive kind is entirely an illusion
in a progressive society of this kind.

The puppetmaster's perception that's backed up by the phony per-
ception of a market rebound, will spin the belief that only people
with "skin in the game", under constant crisis and constant chaos,
can all agree that taxing the rich is an answer to solving our
economic problems—through income redistribution, with
both houses in Congress acting as the "emperor's willing
accomplices". They have all become partners in crime, both
the bureaucracy and the state-controlled media, in order to
destroy what's left of the free market economy, and to create
a slave state—much as Pharaoh would have done against the
jews who were making bricks out of their own straw and clay
—but today would be drilling for their own oil in their own
back yard!

This is a concerted attack on capitalism, and it follows the public
being told with a non-inspiring, non-uplifting, and non-motivational
way, with a cocky and obstinate spirit, that the credit rating
downturn will be followed by a tax increase. It's an attack on
free markets and it's pure socialism—these people don't represent
anything but an empty suit, when it comes down to inventing,
patenting, or implementing actual designs of things that might
help transform humanity—ignorance is their bliss...

Here's what George Patton had to write about "Fear":

I am that dreadful, blighting thing,
Like rat holes to the flood.
Like rust that gnaws the faultless blade,
Like microbes to the blood.

I know no mercy and no truth,
The young I blight, the old I slay.
Regret stalks darkly in my wake,
And ignominy dogs my way.

Sometimes, in virtuous garb I rove,
With facile talk of easier way;
Seducing where I dare not rape,
Young manhood, from it’s honor’s sway.

Again, in awesome guise I rush,
Stupendous, through the ranks of war,
Turning to water, with my gaze,
Hearts that, before, no foe could awe.

The maiden who has strayed from right,
To me must pay the mead of shame.
The patriot who betrays his trust,
To me must owe his tarnished name.

I spare no class, nor cult, nor creed,
My course is endless through the year.
I bow all heads and break all hearts,
All owe me homage — I am FEAR.

What about you, Brad? —I'd rather be a free man in my
grave, fighting against fear, than living as a puppet or a slave!

American

"Don't tell people how to do things, tell them what to do
and let them surprise you with their results."

- George S. Patton

[Brad Guth]

I like being surprised in a positive constructive kind of way, and you
can never have too much information.

Nowadays, I'm surprised it isn't getting a whole lot worse than it
already is.

With the unelected rich and powerful calling all the important shots
so that any republic outcome directly benefits themselves, seems to be
the mainstream status-quo. At least William Mook, myself and a few
others seem to be on the same page, as to the ongoing demise of the
American economy and its people.

Btw; even though our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups
remains dysfunctional and no sign of recovery since July 25, at least

[American]

Most antiquated status-quo science represent Greek statues,
in contrast to what's left for free thinking people—useless
dying for the cause of Occam's razor-testing with empirical
science, continues to fuel the culture of death, falling by the
wayside of successful and intuitive, fringe science.

One of the easiest ways to create the misconceptions that Mook
uses, is to make certain fringe science off-topic, such as
electrogravitic technology, but I've noticed that many times
rather than discuss certain a replacement science any further,
he'll purposely confuse the process of science with the content
of science, and end up being a manufacturer of extended
Mook, status-quo science.

This may be inadvertant on his part, but I'm not saying that
most off his ideas aren't credible—just saying that he usually
forges ahead way too much of the time, trying to include certain
contingencies that would require a major makeover of those
industries being established—industries who are already less
willing to compromise on what deals should be going down,
at taxpayers expense.

IMO the closer one gets to the application of quantum science,
the more established that a sort of universal approach to
truth-seeking makes the political application of science
neutral to subject matter. Therefore, only the investigative
process seems pertinent, and makes politicians more like
judges of what is responsible or irresponsible. Thus the truth
gets hidden, banished, or squandered, depending upon how
the state-controlled media can become reassured that there
are no contradictions between what is responsible science
and irresponsible science.

So-called "experts" are called in to validate and support the
claim (i.e. man-made global warming), that their message
becomes echoed to the n'th degree, of which the supposed
truth is actually a lie.

Politicians must avoid stretching the truth by having others of
authority broadcast your claims. Although the mouthpiece contains
prestige, the scientific source must always back up its touted claim
with stated facts, as the verifyable result—facts that can be
presented by the media at the same time the scientific claim
is being presented to the public.

IMO others should be denied the right to share in the success
of a fact-based truthful claim, unless they can also agree with
immunity that status-quo science is a bygone era, and will now
become relegated to the dust bin of history, as long as intuitive
science prevails.

But notice how certain "authorities" inside the iron beltway,
Washington, D.C. will always avoid examining scientific
evidence, and lie about the results, usually by simply contradicting
the claim publically, without having any watchdog oversight
to police their activity, or any media to withdraw their coverage
of these "kooks", e.g. how long has Al Gore's philosophy on
global warming and green energy been going strong? Answer:
Quite long, because certain media will believe anything that
they are told, and also because of the short-sightedness of
the editors themselves.

Valid scientific claims should be celebrated, according to the
accomplishment, by protecting the celebratory environment in
which the most who would benefit from the implementation of
revolutionary scientists, do so, in the spirit of freedom from
tyrannical and imprisoning, status quo science.

IMO Mook follows scientific progressivism, because he usually
equates his skepticism with any science that is not his
own, by being mostly too narrow-minded, too rigid, and too
critical in excluding scientific intuition, exploratory science,
and certain fringe science, that IMO can and must become
integrated into the civilization, in order to protect and prosper
its people.

All of science can never be equated with the brute force method
that Mook uses to continue to integrate his status quo science,
because of the narrowness of the fields that exclude discovery
by inventiveness and intuition, inspiration through mentorship,
or the force of character, and fields of exploration such as
quantum gravity, free energy, and teleportation.

Not only does his status quo science exclude advanced scientific
application into these fields, but it refuses usually thru his
institutional edicts (aka tensor money), not to integrate them into
mainstream science, because of the possible economic and
societal fallout that might be created with the eventual outcome
of industrial, military, and private industry practices—practices
that might inadvertantly be a subset of his status-quo science
being represented all-too-well inside the iron beltway,
Washington D.C.

Mook's reductionist practices will usually explain what is
unknown by the public at large, in terms of what he can make
as known to himself—by reducing any other science that might
challenge what the status-quo science might offer (green energy)
into his own invention (solar satellites), completely overlooking
or discarding the ideas like free energy and tabletop fusion.

By his attempting to court status-quo science, Mook has
effectively challenged what the word "knosis" means back into
the five senses: hearing, smelling, touching, tasting, and feeling.
However, IMO there are supposedly six, including sensing the
presence of electric and magnetic fields, e.g. what dolphins have
and are able to utilize effectively:

http://www.livescience.com/15240-dolphins-sense-electric-fields.html

Why would there be a lack of knowledge of having a sixth
sense available for humans unless it would raise the
spectre of revolutionary inquiry into the human psyche,
and establish controversy mostly against status-quo science?

Mook, rather than accept that there is a legitimate concern for
disagreement as to blindly accepting that there are only five
senses, for example, would downplay this as the usual
kookiness that has no credibility, since it is not "normal"
for anything to contradict what the status-quo science has
been telling us for over a century now: "Nothing to see here,
move on, this is a police state of science." Sadly, the state-
controlled media has also bought into this viewpoint over the
years, and has actually reinvented itself as a ward of the state,
because of status-quo, "orthodox" science.

There can be no balance with this kind of orthodox science
without participating in an intelligent discussion regarding the
departure from built-in biases in orthodoxy, such as national
and well-publicized moratoriums on things like free energy and
FTL propulsion technology.

American

"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks
should be."

- Albert Einstein

[American]

Why is it becoming a generational edict to banish anything
that is NOT status-quo, from ever making it into our K-12
textbooks? Is it because that the shift to a socialist type
government forces anything that populist media can spin
as familiar, makes it more acceptable and rational with
the brute force of over-policed, over-mandated, and over-
regulated status-quo and orthodox science.

I'm not saying that the "fringe science" as suggested by
myself and other "maverick" types of fringe science, don't
or won't eventually contribute to the child technologies of
scientific orthodoxy, creating a much more viable background
for free markets to prosper, but I am saying that what's
happening right now is a managed decline of the American
economy, especially with the S&P lowering of our credit
rating, and blaming all of the government's borrowing on the
tea party, the free market, and the middle class.

As I write this, the Dow Industrials are down over 600 points.
This is an engineered decline that's being blamed on the
middle class, capitalism, and the free market economy!

Where is the outrage with our supposed representative Congress?
Where is the outrage with our supposed representative Senate?
Where is the outrage with our supposed middle class?

As has been said in this forum, only our K-12 textbooks
are as far as our current status-quo science is capable of
achieving, given a good dose of "familiarity" being associated
with "rationality". "Familiarity" becomes way too superficial
with state-controlled media, and does this at a much faster
rate than "rationality" can accomplish. Anything greater than
our most orthodox K-12 science, is as good as dead science,
as long as any challenge to status-quo science remains unfamiliar
and inadmissible as evidence, mainly because of its "familiarity".

Feed the adults—not the mind of the status quo children—
since children are the most willing accomplices of the state-
controlled media, and therefore are more subject to its biases
and influences, they will not be able to protect themselves from
the onslaught of fantasy and science fiction, that is never able to
spur intelligent discussion leading anywhere positive.

It would seem that only the possibility that unconventional physics
would offer the only way out of this dilemma—one has to be
extremely vigilant to focus on where and when unconventional
science becomes introduced, that the forum and/or media
responsible for the introducing will never, ever, malign or
misinterpret anything unconventional as somehow being
part of a faulty interpretation of conventional science.

Adult "children" categorize unconventional science as honest,
though misinterpreted, status-quo science—science that's
supposed to be conventional, which ultimately short-circuits
any attempt to change the discussion to an open-ended one.

American

"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what
we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal."

- Albert Pike

[American]

Instead of characterizing anything or anyone that is not socialist-
minded as being uncritical, socialists who were invertantly
chosen or elected into public office, will practice the dismissing
of scientific debunkery, as betraying uncritical or 'soft' on the
group-think process, which is anti-individual, tending towards
pro-communist, and a totally humanistic belief system.

Individual scientists who emphasize the critical nature of im-
plementation of free-energy devices for the masses, as a
fundamental make-over on established, closed circuit systems,
and as paramount to the survival of the human species—do so
while maintaining that current scientific conventions run con-
trary to the idea that free energy is able to liberate most
from the dictates of the EPA or bureaucratic bailout, and whose
practicing involvement with our current bureaucratic establishment
also run contrary to the survival of the civilization.

Any more bureaucracy destroys private initiative—governments
MUST be prevented from including themselves in the marketing
process of new ideas—instead they will subvert, sidetrack,
and minimize any efforts of those who would place their
work ahead of the mob's credo, sort of like as GM went, so
went the nation. The socialist mob now wants to be like
they were, but

"GM's U.S. employment reached 618,365 in 1979, making it
the largest private employer in the country. Worldwide employ-
ment broached 853,000. It has been downhill ever since."

http://seekingalpha.com/article/122761-as-gm-goes-so-goes-the-nation-part-1

It's not that this nation desires only those "Alpha" types in
order to reinvent the wheel of industry on a new plane, where
there can be absolutely no flaws along the path to free energy.
The mainstream spin is that flaws along the way to free
energy are simply a waste of time, too complex, and part
of human imperfections at the outset.

Inventions already put into practice is not necessarily an invali-
dator of conventional science, because conventional science at
least, lays the groundwork for sixth-ninth grade comprehension
of twelfth grade science, which may begin to teach things like
aether and quantum theory.

Instead we're witnessing the implementation of GE-like interests
nationwide, and internationally as well, where what the public has
always been comfortable with, is what the public will always be
comfortable with, using Occam's razor for our K-12 belief
system, of the most status-quo 'recognizable' phenomenon
being the most simple.

It's almost as if some law or edict has come down from the
AAAS—which never took into account that the implementation
of science INTO engineering, where the actual rubber meets the
road. Instead, it should have been the AAASE, or the American
Association for the Advancement of Science AND Engineering!

With free-market engineering that establishes a basis for
the expansion of free-market enterprise and beyond, the
simplest fundamental principles can now never become white-
washed into absolute purity, because of the generation-wide
oppression of metered technology on the populus-at-large.

Every single one of the electrical powered communication
system, power grid, or battery system that has ever been
invented, since nearly the turn of the last century, has been
done so with a caveat that the investor always wanted to insert
themselves into the provider part of the energy equation, and
was always doing this evil deed, at the expense of the
inventor's ability to supply the electricity.

Occam's razor cannot be applied just as the status-quo
energy lobbyists think that they see fit in applying it.
Occam's razor has already become a morally relative
concept to entities like the EPA, the AEA, and the Dept.
of Energy. By stretching the meaning "Occam's Razor,"
or the "principole of parsimony," simplest principles have
to be more familiar than not, and therefore have to be—
philosophically immutable.


American

"Be the chief but never the lord."

- Lao Tse

> ...
>
> read more »

[American]

The coverup of completely revelating scientific intuition, during
the Tesla and early progressive era (pre-WW I & II), of revel-
ating scientific intuition, achievement, and accomplishment,
that broke down class suppression barriers, and promoted
an upward mobility for the masses of those under mentorship
in growth industries (steel for aircraft, rockets for missles,
and mass manufacturing for defense), was the prototype for
a much larger and more robust free market economy, based
upon a smaller, constitutional government. It was the link to
larger government programs that industries, via a command
economy left over from military mission objectives, that
became the death knell for anyone that might attempt to
mass produce anything that might inadvertantly create an
economic power that was outside of the military's or
progressive scientific establishment's (first paranoid, and
then, evil) influence.

Scientific truth has been around for centuries—it has just
been sequestered from those considered "inferior" to others,
with the ability to manipulate their own destiny in favor of
their own future. It could either be the ultimate in human
oppression, or it could help to expand the human species
throughout the known universe. The choice is always not
so apparent as it is today. It is because of the right kind of
information being available to those who can recognize
the benefit to mankind—but it is also a retrospective attack
on anything that would attempt to maintain current status-
quo science as the "catch-all" parlour trick for the status-quo.

The market is 'up on the come' because investors expect
the Fed to print market or buy stock, after the much-too-obvious
short-sell, initiated fall. It's the bureacracy-initiated, pro-
bipolar market of choice, that helps to create enough fear from
potential investors, and it was designed to accomplish this,
in order to snag either large or small business from breaking
away from their parent companies, because of the forced drift
of bureaucratic centralization to the left of the economy.

This murkiness that draws in masses of people who are
not so clear about their own future, becomes thrown into
the mix as a potential mob of unemployed, welfare-state
recipients, and it's great rhetoric for a state-run media to grab
hold of. This kind of laziness that perpetrates anger or
madness, is directed at those who are more self-reliant or
have a tinge of self-respect.

Can anyone see where the distinction between scientific
evidence (e.g. mass production being more important than
mass ingratiation) and "systemic proof" (mass salvation more
important than both mass ingratiation or mass production) lies?
Put the evidence where it belongs—the power over death
cannot be overcome until the power of death is destroyed!

Many times when an inventor attempts to market either
his idea or expertise, there are questions that arise as to the
authenticity of his claim: Is it based upon credible scientific
evidence? An inventor is not usually totally obligated to
provide a proof of his claim, because this would either:
(1) cost him the forfeiting the secret of how the idea works
(2) require him to obtain copyright and/or patent protection

IMO today the inventor has to succumb to the financial
pressures becoming so great (e.g. the credit downgrade fiasco)
that his ideas become forfeited at the expense of selling his
idea to those who would "shelve it", in order to continue
making profits in the very area that the inventor was trying
to overcome.

American

"Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of
liberty abused to licentiousness."

- George Washington

> http://seekingalpha.com/article/122761-as-gm-goes-so-goes-the-nation-...

> ...
>
> read more »

[American]

There are those in this country who will completely dismiss
any evidence that a better idea is at hand, just because there
was preliminary evidence that validated some
scientific hypothesis.

They will argue that it's not supposed to prove anything—just
because a new idea is supposed to mean something good
that it should either be "in vogue or a fad at the time" actually
feminizes the capitalization of the inventor to an extent that
disqualifies him from ever partaking in their 'harlot economy'.

Preliminary evidence that an idea works is usually a faithful
indication that the forces of nature are on the side of the
inventor—observational data from an unusual phenomenon
represent the hallmark of scientific achievement. This is
what the mainstream media will never report on, because
of their blind obedience to the state-controlled media.

Scientific proof, meant as some kind of the mass salvation
we're having today with the situational ethics of government
as god, and being more important than both mass ingratiation
with either a welfare check or food stamps, or mass production
with green energy electric vehicles, should never have to precede
any evidence being as the mass production of revolutionary
life-extending technology, being more important than
mass ingratiation, or extended carnality.

The reason for this is because ultimately, the war is between
the forces of light and the forces of darkness—the 'light'
being anything that leads to extended life, and the
'darkness' being anything that destroys or diminishes life.

IMO many who come against the credibility of revolutionary
energy and propulsion technology need to have the
answers shoved in their face, so to speak, thus a wider
party of peers, along with a non-biased media, can come to
be witnesses for, in order to protect the interests of the inventor,
as well as the science behind the man.

Those who could never believe in the resurrection want proof
againt the evidence that had already been established. They
insist that the resurrection was only a "phenomenon" that
could give believers hope, rather than solid evidence that
there was a power of life that overcame the forces of
darkness and wickedness, present with the Pharisees and
Sanhedrin, and just as we have today with the Congress
and Senate.

Associating a phenomenon with criteria of proof is a
method that status-quo scientists use to invalidate claims
made by "fringe science". Inventors are under no obligation
and under no circumstances to provide a proof where it
would harm the usefulness or credibility of the claim.

Notice how ill-defined U.S. science is, with things like the
issue of the resurrection, and notice how, will all of our
supposed scientific know-how, that the status-quo version
of science, in this case, must either completely sequestre
or separate any credibility of authority, with phenomenon that
must be considered as "unconventional" or "religious".

The proof that one must use according to statists, in this case
demands more evidence that is out of the ordinary, when
in fact there has been advances in human cell regenerative
ability, since the late 1800's, that would boggle the mind!

It would seem that there is nothing that any medically scientific,
and useful biological process could achieve in real time, when
more evidence of life over death will always lie just out of reach
or beyond the establishment version of one's imagination, and
of what the status-quo has already marginally accomplished
and attempted for our own sake.

Aether science has been around since the turn of the last
century, and there have been possibly hundreds of thousands
of documents available to the common man that confirm its
existence through discussions of zero point energy and
the like.

The science has been mostly sequestered by a protection
of military interest, but mostly because of the fear that
secrets would fall into the hands of those who are the
anti-Christ figures—denying the virgin birth, miracles,
and resurrection from the dead, of a son of God, who
disappeared into the clouds, and promised to return in
the same way that He left.

It is the anti-Christ figure, who would form an alliance with
Satan, to overthrow the chosen people of God, and make
humans the slaves that they were when these "fallen angels"
first arrived on the scene.

IMO it is the Luciferians who want to control the world, in
the form of the NWO. The are evidence-destroyers, rather
than evidence builders, for the case of Christ. They take the
weak-minded by the brute-force method of having to demand
that circumstantial evidence leads no where—mainly because
everything cannot be brought into a laboratory and examined
under a microscope—in order to force some material benefit
upon themselves, by keeping the biologist's eye on the
microscope, or the hollywood actor's picture in the camera.

According to one kind of revolutionary science, the material
properties of an element in a state of flux can become
another element—which means that the properties of
a material that is designed to be the skin of an aircraft
which can flux itself from one atomic orientation to another,
and doing this at several trillions of times per second, can
never be taken out of its context and put on the lab bench
of a status-quo scientist and analyzed as a single element.

Being part of a larger system dynamic, but then looked
through a microscopic lens, is the same as throwing the
proverbial baby out with the bath water, when regarding the
entire technology of electrogravitics, that must work together
for the intended result.

American

"It will free man from the remaining chains, the chains of
gravity which still tie him to this planet."

- Wernher Von Braun

> ...
>
> read more »