Geoengineering via Moon relocation and its exploitation
Brad Guth
Our planet needs affordable, much cleaner and less bloody alternatives for any number of rare elements and the energy by which to exploit and process them elements while further accommodating our way of living large regardless of the increasing grief and disparity we so often impose upon others and in return we get to deal with their revenge Karma. For this treacherous path to resolve itself in a terrestrial friendly kind of way, means going off-world and exploiting our moon before we can justify exploiting other planets or any of their moons, and for the moment China seems to be taking the lead point on this quest of resolving their future security for unlimited generations to come.
The notion of any eventual relocation of our moon to Earth L1 is not going to be a foolproof kind of ultimate do-everything solution to the global GW and AGW issues at hand, because we’ll still have our dysfunctional and/or easily corrupted politicians, as well as their typically dysfunctional government agencies overlapping one another without sufficient collaborative benefits to speak of doing us any sufficient amount of lasting good, and we’ll still have our MIC run by the oligarchs and Bilderbergs regardless of whomever we elect or appoint, plus we’ll always get to deal with numerous faith-based groups, cabals/mafias and clever individuals as getting more than their fair share of political benefits and/or cloaked by a religion plus otherwise protected by the special privileges and benefits granted to those claiming as being directly in touch with god or supposedly on the same side as their god, which never has to justify or be held accountable for any of his/her/their individual or collective actions.
Even though this moon relocation should provide a handy and badly needed 3.5% spot of solar shade (this is actually a fully adjustable amount of solar isolation via halo orbit management), plus some help with a bit of CME protection by way of adding its lunar magnetosphere and thus extending and/or broadening the scope of our much greater terrestrial magnetosphere, plus offering the nifty reduction of our ocean tides to roughly 50% and otherwise cutting down on seismic issues or earthquake triggers by a good 400%, whereas there’d still be an ongoing expansion of us humans consuming everything in sight, along with our commercial and industrial mass consumption of hydrocarbons and the continued release and/or creation of CO2, NOx plus numerous other acidic and/or toxic elements in addition to a total disregard of exploiting and/or the releasing of H2S, CH4 and volumes of 4He in addition to whatever nature already contributes more than anyone honestly needs. However, eventually a trend of rebuilding glacial ice volumes and tempering our global climate down to a dull roar of having fewer if any of those pesky category 5 storms, and considerably less tidal surge issues should go a long ways towards saving our coastal cities, towns and villages, thus saving our planet several hard earned trillions per year (not to mention countless lives kept out of harms way), that could instead be invested in advanced infrastructure and otherwise improved quality of life for most every biodiversity species of life on Earth. At least I can’t think of any species of life that would be worse off by exploiting our moon, because the vast majority of life as we know it is actually pretty good at adapting to better conditions.
In this updated reply context, I haven’t even bothered to address what direct benefits of exploiting the innards of our moon should have to offer, not to mention fully exploiting the Earth-moon L1 that would become a very cool (literally cryogenic on the near side as heated only by it’s residual core and good old planetshine) once that moon is parked within Earth L1, as our highly beneficial outpost/gateway/OASIS and its lunar space elevator along with offering another tethered element reaching for yet another science and nifty space hotel outpost as though dangling to within 7r of Earth. Obviously the far-side of the moon while parked within Earth-L1 is going to constantly roast at 1.4+ KW/m2 and its physically dark and paramagnetic basalt crust should accordingly expand and stabilize.
Of course, if our moon is simply kept as too NASA/Apollo taboo and/or DARPA Operation Paperclip nondisclosure rated, there’s always the extremely nearby planet Venus and of what GuthVenus has to offer, as well as exploiting what a very cool Venus L2 as yet another nifty outpost/gateway and OASIS, that’s also relatively easy to get ourselves to/from every 19 month cycle.
“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/2009/07/brad-guth-index.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
Brad Guth
The moon doesn’t offer a soft low-density shell or crust, other than its thick layer of crystal dry dust that’s likely contaminated with the likes of platinum, gold and perhaps a few trillion worth of He3 within the first meters of its dust and bedrock. Instead it offers a much tougher 3.5 g/cm3 version of a highly paramagnetic form of fused basalt and quite possibly along with a little carbonado mixed in for good measure because via CVD it really isn’t all that hard to accomplish.
Hollow moon, anyone?
With those Chinese TBMs soon giving better access to our terrestrial geothermal resources, along with thorium and uranium produced energy (not to mention loads of renewable and clean solar derived energy plus eventually fusion) and our using those Mook engineered plasma methods of sorting through and extracting specific atomic elements while they’re still on the fly, whereas most any intelligent other species of complex life (including ourselves) can even manage to survive upon a wandering or rogue and otherwise extremely icy starlit planet, especially doable as failsafe if it has any large moon(s) to work with.
If we have basic space travel capability (as clearly demonstrated by multiple nations) , then we also have what it takes for dealing with exploiting our moon and even the extremely nearby planet Venus, as well as my estimate or swag of there being as many as another 2e12 wandering/rogue items of Ceres and larger within our galaxy shouldn't be asking too much, not to mention those thousand plus other units of icy little planetoids like Ceres, Sedna and a few as somewhat larger items being associated within the outer limits of each solar system Oort cloud. In other words, other than distance issues there’s really no shortage of mass to get exploited.
As to the soft or inverse density innards of our moon (especially of the likely inverse density below it’s extremely tough and paramagnetic basalt crust and possibly even to some extent naturally geode hollow) should by rights make for a rather terrific failsafe kind of artificial off-world habitat, with a nearly unlimited rare element cache by way of those Chinese TBMs eventually excavating perhaps .1% of its volume, makes sufficient room for all of us plus billions more to come. I believe China already fully understands this.
Metals, liquids and gasses are going to be just about everywhere we’d care to look (terrestrial as will as off-world and for certain as cosmic), including the full spectrum of combinations that bind into nifty stuff like water, methane and all sorts of mostly heavier combinations of gases, liquids and solids, along with the usual exception of rogue helium that’s constantly created via fusion and otherwise radioactive decay created but unfortunately doesn't bind with anything unless there either a hell of a lot of gravity or being kept below 2.2 K, because otherwise it doesn’t even bind with itself. However, our conventional terrestrial resources of rare metals and valuable elements like helium are getting depleted and environmentally problematic, not to mention spendy as well as getting speculated to death and thereby hoarded plus a wee bit bloody from time to time. Exploiting via plasma technology is not currently an option as quite like William Mook has to suggest, though eventually it’ll have to come down to that advanced level of efficiently extracting and processing in order to affordably whatever we need on demand.
How we got our moon isn't even close to being resolved.
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/venus-mission-might-solve-mystery-moons-origin-2D11692106
"It is improbable that the impactor had the same composition as the early Earth," Robin Canup, of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colo., wrote in a commentary published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
"The oxygen isotope composition of Mars, for example, differs from that of the Earth by more than a factor of 50," Canup added. "If the impactor was as different from Earth as Mars is, its signature would still be detectable in the moon, even after a giant collision."
According to some geologists, Venus could have once had a moon, because of its complex topography indicates as though having had those necessary strong tidal issues in order to have morphed its toasty surface into offering such mountainous terrain. A better look-see at our moon and Venus, by objectively comparing the surface bedrock of each, would greatly resolve issues as to understanding how those two items came to be, and perhaps resolving why Earth turned out as it did.
From direct observations, we now know that newborn stars (similar to the mass of our own sun) and their developing solar systems do not materialize without a great deal of agitation and physical interactions, especially within the first 10 to 100 million years as the tossed-off plasma surplus of photons and extensively heavy elements manage to interact, cool and combine into worthy spheres of solids, liquids and somehow manage to retain geode pockets or reservoirs of those vital liquids and gasses, with the heavier elements forming those fission sustained cores of planets and moons. We also know that such creation via their molecular nebula cloud(s) can be those of involving yet another millionfold greater mass that also had to get blown away by those terrific initial solar CMEs and considerable winds of 3000+ km/sec, much like those solkar winds from Sirius(abc) had to have recently generated in addition to providing those initial 1e26~1e27 kg or possibly greater CMEs, some of which likely didn't escape and having eventually formed into their own solar system of planets, moons and assorted asteroids.
There’s also new research suggesting another theory that cosmic energy influx does manage to heat our planet by at least as much as we humans(100+ TW) contribute, although the extremely dense atmosphere surrounding Venus would have prevented most of that cosmic influx from reaching its mostly geothermally heated surface, just like the vast majority of solar influx is currently fended off. Our naked moon is however a solidified tough sphere of dense and highly paramagnetic basalt crust, and its physically dark surface is kind of defenseless for our needs, unless we use those TBMs in order to go underground where it’s relatively failsafe and perfectly cozy (perhaps better off than any other moon or planet we know of, including Earth).
We simply can not afford to ignore the growing need to exploit our moon and that of the extremely nearby planet Venus. At least China seems to know best, however, it also seems that our Usenet/newsgroup of resident naysay brown-nosed clowns and mainstream FUD-masters are the prevailing intellectual terrorist army of our status quo minions getting in the way of any progress that would lead to surpluses of any kind (terrestrial or off-world derived), perhaps because global prosperity would only lead to a phase of global contentment with much less wealth disparity, and they’ll be damned if that’s ever going to pass inspection as long as they and their fellow oligarchs and Bilderbergs are still alive.
Brad Guth
The China exploited moon is going to be a very good thing for our terrestrial and off-world needs.
For the most part, over thousands of years China has been doing the right thing in spite of what other nations had been doing to it, and as a whole give and take the world has generally benefited (at one point they even made it possible for us to bomb the living shit out of the mostly civilians of Japan). If China had failed to avoid or fend off the likes of Zionist Nazis and their Hitler puppet warlord, we’d all be speaking a German version of Mandarin as of long ago. So, by all measure, their surviving with sufficient national and ethnicity integrity in spite of what other nations had been doing to one another, has been a blessing compared to what certain other nations of special white ethnicity had in mind for us.
CCD outfitted cameras while situated on the daytime illuminated surface of that physically dark moon, as such need a little cooling assistance. Such imagers heated to 117+ C typically do not perform very well, if at all due to having too much noise or piss-poor DR). The common solution is the use of active cooling for those imagers, and this cooling must always be monitored and regulated by the local and terrestrial computers. Their mission science must include an active data feed as to all of their internal circuitry temps and methods of actively cooling. So, where is this mission critical data feed and their camera design/engineering specs of having active cooling?
Modern digital cameras can easily outperform conventional film DR(dynamic range) by at least 5 db (not to mention offering their much wider color spectrum sensitivity which can include IR and UV), providing an equivalent of 32 times better DR, and a truly advanced scientific CCD imager should easily obtain a 6 DB or 64:1 DR advantage over Kodak film (especially of individually recorded images at maximum resolution using an actively cooled CCD imager populated with at least 16.777 million pixels or photon buckets, as opposed to a video camera of only HDTV quality that’s not any better than what a retail consumer GoPro delivers). Problem is, these fancy imagers need to be kept relatively cool (accomplishing anything below 333 K while operating on the daytime illuminated moon can become problematic without a solid or liquid coolant supply that can sublime, or having a fairly large amount of radiating fin area in conjunction with an electric heat-pump cooling system).
There are some really good CMOS and CCD imagers, not to mention newer better imagers of large area format available from China:
http://leicarumors.com/2012/09/19/the-24mp-max-sensor-inside-the-new-leica-m-is-mabe-by-cmosis.aspx/
http://leicarumors.com/2010/11/07/kodak-announces-new-29mp-full-frame-ccd-sensor.aspx/
Why wouldn’t they send their very best actively cooled CCD imagers and finest camera optics to the moon?
Why are their cameras malfunctioning, or are they simply dysfunctional due to the heat?
Why are their gamma spectrometry instruments still not working? (is it simply too hot by day?)
What sort of special lens optics and narrow bandpass filters do each of their CCD cameras have to work with?
Why are those local X-ray and gamma radiation readings not being detected and shared with the world?
“ESTIMATION OF THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF FLAT AREAS ON THE MOON”
“A 1322.5 w/m2 change of the ESI would lead to 179.4K change in surface daytime temperature”
Perhaps imaging and other science via cool(179 K) EIS planetshine should more than do the trick by offering up to 3.9 w/m2 illuminating upon the surface, offering plenty of even naked eye working illumination inspite of their physically dark as coal surface. Combining of pixels offers the same benefit as having larger area pixels, such as with four times the low-light sensitivity and only a fourth the resolution is still offering an impressive 4.19 million pixel CCD image and still using large format optics doesn’t leave all that much to be desired, not to mention what a little bit of artificial illumination and especially of what the UV illuminated spectrum has to offer for the detection of all those secondary/recoil photons as detectable within our human visual spectrum.
Their previous mission:
https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/c-missions/chang-e-1
100 megapixel CCD
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/202936/8320343.html
“The camera, IOE3-Kanban, was developed by the Institute of Optics and Electronics under the CAS and is capable of producing images with 10,240 x 10,240 pixels, the statement said. Moreover, it is small and light, with its widest part measuring only 19.3 cm, the statement said, adding that it can be used at temperatures ranging from minus 20 degrees centigrade to 55 degrees centigrade.”
So, what happens to their CCD image quality or that of degrading its DR at 125+ C internal heat conditions? (it kinda tanks unless being artificially cooled)
Perhaps their real science is not going to start until after sundown.
On Friday, December 20, 2013 3:37:03 PM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote: