Google Groups Usenet Newsgroups is dysfunctional because:

85 views
Skip to first unread message

Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 7, 2011, 9:47:14 PM8/7/11
to Google Usenet
Google Groups version of Usenet Newsgroups is just too public and
unmoderated to suit those pulling our government strings.

It's looking as though the Rothschilds and their devout Qinetiq(MI6/
CIA) FUD-masters have the vast majority of us snookered and
dumbfounded past the point of no return, as well as scared to death of
our own shadows, plus no question that absolute silence from team
Google means they are in on it, or at least being told to keep quiet
or else.

99.9% of Americans do not know that Usenet/newsgroups is even
available as a global network of mostly unmoderated (aka free speech)
news information that they can interact with, and of those 0.1%
there’s less than 0.1% that are actively utilizing Usenet/newsgroups
(that’s less than one out of a million). By way of keeping Google
Groups version of accessing Usenet/newsgroups dysfunctional is very
essential test or dry-run of any future NWO or OWG command, and it's
certainly what Hitler and his mafia cabal of ZNRs would be doing).

Btw; even though Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is still
dysfunctional and no sign of recovery since July 25, at least my
"Google-Usenet" and " Guth-Usenet" accounts are still fully functional
and for the moment they are open to the public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 8, 2011, 6:29:01 AM8/8/11
to Google Usenet
Google Groups own social networking and their Groups+ version of
Usenet Newsgroups that includes all sorts of worthless crap besides
efficient text content, as such probably overwhelmed their own multi-
terabyte servers, not to mention the entire world of Usenet related
servers that couldn’t possibly keep up.

It’s simply unadulterated crap of purely greedy, childish and selfish
stupidity that’s most likely what’s killing the functionality of
Usenet/newsgroups. It should have been easy for team Google to kill,
exclude or at least divert the likes of “Dual-Duality” and others like
“NewzBin2” from loading their gigabytes and even terabytes of pirated
and/or even of their own copyrighted video and music sharing material
into Usenet/newsgroup channels, as though it’s a free-for-all public
funded service, and you can’t tell me that team Google had no idea as
to the consequences of their own actions.

Dual-Duality on Usenet | Dual-Duality
www.dual-duality.org/blog/
“We're going to start uploading all our releases to usenet from here
on out, beginning with our most active releases and followed by our
completed projects. NZB files will be made available on the download
page. ...”

NewzBin2 is yet another heavy duty violator that was allowed to trash
Usenet.
http://www.newzbin.com/
-
Then we have this little tidbit: http://letstell.com/the-war-is-on/
Google, the service so great it became a verb, can now add security
risk to its roster of unintended results. The search site played
inadvertent host to remotely accessed Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) systems in a Black Hat conference demo led by
FusionX's Tom Parker. The security company CTO walked attendees
through the steps required to gain control of worldwide utility
infrastructure -- power plants, for one -- but stopped short of
actually engaging the vulnerable networks. Using a string of code,
unique to a Programmable Logic Controller (the computers behind
amusement park rides and assembly lines) Parker was able to pull up a
water treatment facility's RTU pump, and even found its disaster-
welcoming "1234" password -- all through a Google search. Shaking your
head in disbelief? We agree, but Parker reassured the crowd these
types of outside attacks require a substantial amount of effort and
coordination, and "would be extremely challenging to pull off." Panic
attack worn off yet? Good, now redirect those fears to the imminent
day of robot-helmed reckoning.
-
It’s kind of a wonder that Usenet has lasted this long. If I were in
charge of Google groups there’d be lots of heads rolling, and
otherwise bounties placed on the heads of outsiders violating Usenet/
newsgroup bandwidth usage, such as upon those posting images or other
bandwidth hogging files without moral limitations nor respect for
others of any kind.

Btw; even though Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is still
dysfunctional and no sign of recovery since July 25, at least my
"Google-Usenet" and " Guth-Usenet" accounts are still fully functional
and for the moment they are open to the public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en

http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


Brad Guth

unread,
Aug 8, 2011, 1:37:08 PM8/8/11
to Google Usenet
For at least a temporary work-around solution for the regular GG or GG
+ version of Usenet/newsgroups that's still not functioning via
Google, there's this independent "Google Usenet" channel that's open
for business and no strings attached.

If this alternative works, then I really can't see why Team Google
can't at least give us some kind of heads-up about their regular
public access to most of everything else.

Let me know if you have any other ideas as to why Team Google is
either so retarded or held captive against their will. As is kind of
make us believe Google is somehow in charge of mainstream media damage-
control on behalf of those in charge of world banking and money
changing that in one seriously bad situation after another.


On Aug 7, 6:47 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Brad Guth

unread,
Dec 9, 2013, 12:31:12 AM12/9/13
to google...@googlegroups.com
The good news is that GG+ is no longer dysfunctional, however with using the regular public accessible newsgroups it's taking roughly tenfold as much bandwidth and CPU demand, and it automatically includes a great many blank lines whenever existing context is included as any part of a typical reply.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages