On 24/05/13 22:33, Yash Saxena wrote:
> On what behalf my proposal seems useless to you or to mentor named Nmap
> Security Scanner.
> If my proposal seemed to be irrelevant or useless Thanks for your post.
>
> I would say Gsoc is total waste of time and not worth believing and
> participating in it.
>
> No faith on Google.
Your reply shows the long path that you still need to follow.
You are mostly dealing with volunteers. The easiest action when you say
something irrelevant or dumb is to ignore you. In this field, answers
are sometimes harsh, focusing in the technical details and little in
politeness. Jordi has been so kind to explain you your error, you have
no ground to be offended.
You have not participated in GSoC, so far you are only *attempting* to
participate. Oh, and it isn't a religion, so there's no need to believe
on it. By the way, your last sentence is quite childish.
Finally, having read your proposal at
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/yash_92/1
a) Jordi is right in that it isn't related to nmap in any way-
b) Your �Additional info� link points to an inexistent domain.
c) Even if it was on-topic for the organization your proposal is too
weak. You are giving a case for a DRM-like protection, but says nothing
on how you are attempting to solve it, much less on how you expect to do
it (how is that �hologram� made? What prevents to duplicate the
holograms? Will I need to buy a new computer to use it? ), much less how
you expect it to be completed in two months.
That description might be ok for filing a patent, but it's not ok for
what gsoc organizations would expect.
PS: Are you aware that gsoc code needs to be open source?
Sorry if this mail disappoints you. I hope it results helpful.