On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, MikeHarris<roundho...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I checked the list of acceptable date formats in
> the docs and modified my site code so that the meta tag would be
> generated in the following way:
>
> <meta http-equiv="last-modified" content="200908041203" />
That matches "YYYYMMDDHHmm" in the accepted formats list on the latest
Mini revision.
This is an http-equiv, so you would think it istaken "as-if" it was in
the HTTP headers. I don't know for sure but, perhaps the Mini isn't
catching this, and it's _only_ looking at the HTTP headers?
Another thought: I've never known http-equiv to be case sensitive, but
- just in case the Mini is doing something different - you might want
to try "Last-modified", "Last-Modified" ... or perhaps try a new meta
element altogether and add a new rule on the "Document Dates" page to
match.
> However having recrawled the pages the RES->R->FS["VALUE"] field is
> now empty.
Hmm. Unless the docs _on_ the Mini are wrong, I'd think this would work.
Q: When you remove the proxystylesheet parameter from your search URI,
can you find a date _anywhere_ in the XML?
Some notable notes from the Google Mini Help Center:
"For the date extracted from the title, text, URL, or meta tag, the
first instance of the most common date format encountered is
considered the date of the document."
"Use meta tags with dates in the ISO-8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD) to avoid
the confusion caused by multiple dates and multiple formats in the
title or text of the documents."
--
Joe D'Andrea
Liquid Joe LLC | Google Enterprise Partner
www.liquidjoe.biz | skype:joedandrea | +1 (908) 781-0323