plu.sr is "screen scraping" the HTML of your public posts... so this
sounds like a mistake or a bug on the part of plu.sr
---
What do you think the name of your Google Plus posts feed should be? I
hate that they're inconsistent as to whether the name of their service
is "Plus" or "+" or "G+"
the link you sent said
"Galina Ovcharova - Google+ Post Feed" -- I think the title came from plu.sr
I don't like the word "Feed" in there, since everything's a feed, and
the + is almost invisible next to the big "Google".
I'm thinking "Galina Ovcharova's Google Plus Posts"
I'm currently simplifying and improving sharebro.org's Subscribe
feature so that it puts feeds from various sources inside different
folders, including a new Google Plus Posts folder.
--
Alex Chaffee - al...@stinky.com
http://alexchaffee.com
http://twitter.com/alexch
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Galina_Ovt <galina.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Galina Ovcharova's Google Plus Posts" sounds fine to me. "Galina
> Ovcharova's Google+ Post" would sound fine as well: I do see the "+" :) .
> You know, now that I have spelled out both titles next to each other, I
> think that I like the Google+ version better: I do see the "+" and notice
> it much faster than the word "Plus".
So your vote is for candidate A *and* candidate B :-)
> I have looked at plu.sr and noticed the following:
> New! If you want only the first sentence in the RSS
> title: http://plu.sr/feed.php?plusr=103855919375511821531&short=true
This sounds like the smart way to do it. I'll go add 'short=true' to
the plus feed url now. Unfortunately it's kind of hard to unsubscribe
the old way since it's a different URL now. I'll do what I can.
I will have a new Subscribe button soon -- like hopefully today --
that does all these things we're talking about.
> I have already subscribed to
> my "&short=true" version in my GReader. Too bad that (having a limit of 10
> posts)
Wait, who's got a limit of 10 posts? The short=true plu.sr feed? That stinks.
> In any case, turning the entire G+ post into the title does not
> look like a smart idea.
Yeah, I wonder why he even made it an option. It should just be the
way it all works now.
> BTW, Alex, I could not find a thread where it would be appropriate to list
> those missing GReader features that you did not list
> at http://sharebro.org/features
Then let's make a new thread!