On May 22, 10:49 pm, ccrum <
cameron.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently noticed that the polyline returned in each step in a route
> does not always start and end with the coordinates the step says it
> does. For Instance, I ran a directions query from Fort Worth, TX to
> Austin, TX. The start and end points returned were:
>
> 32.72468 -97.32085 and 32.04823 -97.09488
> and it's html was "Take the ramp on the <b>left</b> onto <b>I-35W S</
> b>"
A link to a map would be better.
I get this:
http://www.geocodezip.com/v3_GoogleEx_directions-draggable2Xml.html?addr1=Fort%20Worth,%20TX&addr2=Austin,%20TX
The first point of the polyline returned for me is:
<point lat='32.725410' lng='-97.320840' />
>
> The start point of the polyline was indeed 32.72468 -97.32085 but the
> last point of the polyline was 32.48797,-97.54039.
The last point of the polyline I get is:
<point lat='30.267100' lng='-97.743080' />
> The polyline also
> contained 603 points. This is a dramatic difference in location
> between what the path reports and the polyline shows. Furthermore,
> Step 3 started with the declared end point of Step 2 (32.04823
> -97.09488) and continued on. There were breaks like this in other
> steps as well. Step 3 had the following start and end coordinates
> listed in the step:
>
> 32.04823 -97.09488 and 31.04757 -97.46572
>
> and once again the Step 3 polyline started with the same coordinates
> (32.04823 -97.09488), but ended dramatically different with
> 31.21956,-97.61789 as the last point of the polyline. Step 4 was also
> off, but steps 5,6,7, and 8 had matching step coordinates and polyline
> start and end coordinates. The latter steps were also much shorter
> containing only a few sets of coordinates whil3 2,3 and 4 had several
> hundred coordinates each.
>
> So, does anyone have any idea why this is happening? If I try to plot
> the lines on a map abased on the polyline coordinates, I get several
> disjointed lines and they are definitely not the route from Fort Worth
> to Austin unless Google is assuming we can teleport along the path. I
> need the actual polylines as I am trying to determine total miles
> traveled per state and can do an intersect query in SQL spatial
> against a set of state polygons to determine which step subsections
> are in which states. If the polylines "wander" like this, I won't be
> able to use them.
What polyline are you looking at? The simplified summary polyline
(overview_path) or the polylines in the steps (path)?
-- Larry
>
> Regards,
>
> Cameron