This list seems a bit dead but still linked to from the main github project. If there is a better place to ask questions now, please redirect me.
The provider variation below works fine to create a KubeCtl instance using @Provider where the @Named("CONFIG") object is injected as an argument to the @Provider method:
public class GlobalConfigGuiceModule extends AbstractModule {
Properties config = null;
@Override
protected void configure() {
loadConfig(); //populates config Properties object above
Names.bindProperties(binder(), config); //Binds property @Named configuration to the config object
}
@Provides
@Named("CONFIG")
@Singleton
public Properties ConfigProvider() {
return config;
}
//Property object injected
@Provides
public KubeCtl kubeCtlClientProvider( @Named("CONFIG") Properties conf) {
//Call conf.getProperty() for kubectl.namespace, kubectl.basePath and kubectl.credsFile
//Create KubeCtl instance
}
}
Why doesn't the following variation of kubeCtlClientProvider() work?
//Individual @Named properties NOT injected
@Provides
public KubeCtl kubeCtlClientProvider(
@Named("kubectl.namespace") String namespace,
@Named("kubectl.basePath") String basePath,
@Named("kubectl.credsFile") String credentialFile) {
//Create KubeCtl instance using arguments directly
}
I get the error:
[Guice/MissingImplementation]: No implementation for String annotated with @Named(value="kubectl.namespace") was bound.
Yet when I do field injection in my other classes, the following works fine. I'm missing something.
MyOtherClass {
@Inject
@Named("kubectl.namespace")
String namespace;
....
}
Thanks!