Free WiFi at airports that already HAD free WiFi

[Kristen]

What sense does that make? By saying it is from google to promote it
maybe...But wouldn't it be a better gift if you had it in airports
that you had to pay for it? Like LAX? I feel like google is just "re-
gifting"

[mzieg]

Yeah...I deeply appreciate the free service at Logan in Boston (saved
my bacon, seriously), but I'm a little puzzled as to how MCO (Orlando)
and CMH (Columbus) got on the list...they already had free WiFi. Are
you going to Google-brand our free air, too?

Finally, though I shouldn't complain about a gift, I'm sad that
Atlanta didn't make the cut...would have helped :-P

Google still rocks, though. Nearly always :-)

[Bear_Ryan]

I think why they put "free" Wifi in places that already had free Wifi
was so that more people could have a chance to donate and get their
donations matched.

On Dec 21, 12:50 pm, mzieg <m...@zieg.co.uk> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 6:19 pm, Kristen <barracuda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What sense does that make? By saying it is from google to promote it
> > maybe...But wouldn't it be a better gift if youhadit inairports

> > that youhadto pay for it? Like LAX? I feel like google is just "re-
> > gifting"
>
> Yeah...I deeply appreciate thefreeservice at Logan in Boston (saved

> my bacon, seriously), but I'm a little puzzled as to how MCO (Orlando)

> and CMH (Columbus) got on the list...theyalreadyhadfreeWiFi.  Are
> you going to Google-brand ourfreeair, too?