Side By Side Search -

72 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Cizmar

unread,
Sep 14, 2009, 11:21:51 AM9/14/09
to Google Enterprise Labs
Has anyone gotten side by side search to work with say bing,
sharepoint, fast or another search tool? There is an issue posted
on the code.google.com site related to this matter. I got similar
results.

Thanks,

Michael

AndrewLA Boby

unread,
Oct 6, 2009, 12:12:32 AM10/6/09
to Google Enterprise Labs
i've got the same problem....


On Sep 14, 11:21 pm, Michael Cizmar <michael.ciz...@mcplusa.com>
wrote:

Michael Cizmar

unread,
Oct 6, 2009, 12:14:54 AM10/6/09
to Google Enterprise Labs
It's basically not implemented. You'll have to write a custom parser
if you want to use it to indexing non Google Search Appliance sites.

Cheers,

M
> > Michael- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cyrus Mistry

unread,
Oct 6, 2009, 2:31:16 AM10/6/09
to google-ente...@googlegroups.com
Hi everyone,

Sorry about that.  Just added this to the issue:

This will happen if you choose the 'store results with each judgment' option (on by default). If you deselect that option on all the profiles, it will work fine with any search engine. It has been tested. Please let me know if that fixes your issue. Thanks.

Bottom line on this (for those techies out there) - the store results with each judgment is a very cool option which is actually able to parse the GSA results that come back and store the results with the judgment so that those that are analyzing why someone chose policy A over B can see what the results look liked when the user voted for policy A.  Hope this helps!

-C

Michael Cizmar

unread,
Oct 6, 2009, 8:43:14 PM10/6/09
to Google Enterprise Labs
Thanks for the update. That does in fact do the trick. In the
meantime, we've wrote custom parsers for bing, google and sharepoint.
I think this option is better as it removes the UI from equation.

Cheers,

Michael

On Oct 6, 1:31 am, Cyrus Mistry <cyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Sorry about that.  Just added this to the issue:
>
> This will happen if you choose the 'store results with each judgment' option
> (on by default). If you deselect that option on all the profiles, it will
> work fine with any search engine. It has been tested. Please let me know if
> that fixes your issue. Thanks.
>
> Bottom line on this (for those techies out there) - the store results with
> each judgment is a very cool option which is actually able to parse the GSA
> results that come back and store the results with the judgment so that those
> that are analyzing why someone chose policy A over B can see what the
> results look liked when the user voted for policy A.  Hope this helps!
>
> -C
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Michael Cizmar
> <michael.b.ciz...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > It's basically not implemented.  You'll have to write a custom parser
> > if you want to use it to indexing non Google Search Appliance sites.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > M
>
> > On Oct 5, 11:12 pm, AndrewLA Boby <andrews...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > i've got the same problem....
>
> > > On Sep 14, 11:21 pm, Michael Cizmar <michael.ciz...@mcplusa.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Has anyone gotten side by side search to work with say bing,
> > > > sharepoint, fast or another search tool?    There is an issue posted
> > > > on the code.google.com site related to this matter.  I got similar
> > > > results.
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > Michael- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages