Thanks for the update. That does in fact do the trick. In the
meantime, we've wrote custom parsers for bing, google and sharepoint.
I think this option is better as it removes the UI from equation.
Cheers,
Michael
On Oct 6, 1:31 am, Cyrus Mistry <
cyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Sorry about that. Just added this to the issue:
>
> This will happen if you choose the 'store results with each judgment' option
> (on by default). If you deselect that option on all the profiles, it will
> work fine with any search engine. It has been tested. Please let me know if
> that fixes your issue. Thanks.
>
> Bottom line on this (for those techies out there) - the store results with
> each judgment is a very cool option which is actually able to parse the GSA
> results that come back and store the results with the judgment so that those
> that are analyzing why someone chose policy A over B can see what the
> results look liked when the user voted for policy A. Hope this helps!
>
> -C
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Michael Cizmar
> <
michael.b.ciz...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > It's basically not implemented. You'll have to write a custom parser
> > if you want to use it to indexing non Google Search Appliance sites.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > M
>
> > On Oct 5, 11:12 pm, AndrewLA Boby <
andrews...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > i've got the same problem....
>
> > > On Sep 14, 11:21 pm, Michael Cizmar <
michael.ciz...@mcplusa.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Has anyone gotten side by side search to work with say bing,
> > > > sharepoint, fast or another search tool? There is an issue posted
> > > > on the
code.google.com site related to this matter. I got similar
> > > > results.
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > Michael- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -