Comment #3 by estebistec:
+1 to standardized primitive hashing functions
Re #2: "This class could also have equals(P,P) methods for all primitives,
that use
{Float,Double}.compare"
Why not just expose "compare" methods for the primitives then?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Comment #4 by jared.l.levy:
The Comparators class already has compare methods for the primitives.
Issue attribute updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
Comment #5 by estebistec:
Right-o. Forgot about that as I generalized his "equals" request...
Back to the main issue in the bug, the hashCode methods would be nice.