Re: License

55 views
Skip to first unread message

Stewart Miles

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 11:55:55 AM9/27/13
to google-code...@googlegroups.com
Hello is anyone out there...


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:43 PM, <smi...@google.com> wrote:
Hi, while I enjoyed the bold license http://www.wtfpl.net/ used by "reflections" it's not a strong enough document to use within one of my projects.  Would it be possible to change the license associated with "reflections" to Apache 2.0, BSD or zlib so that myself - and I'm sure others - can use this library more easily?

Thanks,
Stewart

rithom...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2013, 8:19:20 PM10/28/13
to google-code...@googlegroups.com
I have to agree, a licence that places the F word in it's title can be as open as it likes, but few people are going to inform the business legal team that they have selected a product with such a title.

Roger
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages