Security features.
So let me put the question I posed another way: if CF supported Win2K,
but it was understood that it wasn't nearly as secure as CF on other
platforms, would it still be attractive for your organization?
Regards
This would definitely be attractive to my company. We have to support
IE as several websites that our users must access only support IE.
Being stuck on Windows 2000 on a good number of our machines, being
able to run Chrome Frame in IE 6 on these machines would allow our
company websites to stop supporting IE6 directly, while preventing us
from having to shell out tens of thousands upgrading to new hardware
and OSs.
Because we have to support IE, we would prefer not to support two
browsers. This both complicates management and confuses end users.
Yes, another vote for Windows 2000 Professional support. Is there
that much difference between Windows 5.0 and 5.1?
But is it less secure than using "pure" IE6 on Win2K? Because that is
> The question is still this one: if you know it's gonna be less secure, would
> you like to use it regardless?
the environment a lot of corporate desktops are still based on.