Deadline exceeded on urlfetch calls this afternoon.

31 views
Skip to first unread message

Will Reiher

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 6:56:13 PM10/13/11
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
Getting a bunch of Deadline Exceeded Application Error 5's from the urlfetch library this afternoon with code that has been static for weeks. Thankfully it's failing when checking the shipping rates and not when processing transactions. I don't see any thing in System Status. 

Rishi Arora

unread,
Oct 14, 2011, 12:42:05 AM10/14/11
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
My app experienced this too, specifically with URL Fetches from UPS's systems.  But it seems to be more likely a problem with UPS's servers, and not GAE.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Will Reiher <wrel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Getting a bunch of Deadline Exceeded Application Error 5's from the urlfetch library this afternoon with code that has been static for weeks. Thankfully it's failing when checking the shipping rates and not when processing transactions. I don't see any thing in System Status. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/LCo8WIRYTusJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Deepak Singh

unread,
Oct 14, 2011, 8:58:49 AM10/14/11
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
Me too. Faced this problem today and also GAE 1.5.5 seems to ignore its extended timeout of 60000 and works with default 5 sec.
Pls google let us know if it comes to your maintainance time or anything else which affects the gae behaviour.
 
Thanks
Deepak

Will Reiher

unread,
Oct 14, 2011, 1:16:18 PM10/14/11
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
I can confirm that it wasn't only UPS fetches. I had a intermittent failures when urlfetching small images from AmazonS3 as well.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages