There can only be two 'contacts'. So few people would have to be the
point of contact for all requests - another bottleneck/SPOF into the
'system'
All billing for all the apps would go to one person (by invoice). Who
would then have to collect payment from all the partipating
developers.
Pretty sure somewhere that there is a limit ot the number of requests
per month. A shared system will quickly burn though its 'quota'
... and Google would notice pretty quickly, and almost certainly look
unfavorably on the 'abuse' of the system.
This idea more than illustrates there being a hole in GAE's support of
the little guy. It also points to a possible solution that GAE team
should consider and adopt. What GAE could and should consider is some
form of pooled support for small groups of small users - where the
group itself acts as first support line for filtering out the noise,
such that real issues is what gets to the GAE team. Since even the
GAE team claims that the fee is to cover the costs, there is still
likely the problem of valuable and limited GAE resources being wasted
by support subscribers because they can afford to and not because
their issues are the ones that best utilize those precious GAE
resources. In that sense, requestes from a well filtered source
should be handled free, without any charges - sort of like they are
handled on this group. Just imagine if this group managed to organize
itself better and where it passed onto GAE team only those requests
that it could not answer within the group. Imagine how more
productive and how more valuable the whole experience would be.
On Nov 21, 12:27 pm, Andrius A <andriu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hosting applications under premier account for are big community would not
> work, as it would be difficult to calculate the usage separtly, but I am
> thinking more about getting various issues resolved and questions answered.
> we could have a small organization and use premier account for education
> and testing our apps and limit it to 20-30 members? so we could all have a
> copy of our application running and use it for support?
>
> On 21 November 2011 17:16, Barry Hunter <barrybhun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I dont see how its going to work. Everyones apps would need to be
> > under the same 'Google Apps Account'
>
> > There can only be two 'contacts'. So few people would have to be the
> > point of contact for all requests - another bottleneck/SPOF into the
> > 'system'
>
> > All billing for all the apps would go to one person (by invoice). Who
> > would then have to collect payment from all the partipating
> > developers.
>
> > Pretty sure somewhere that there is a limit ot the number of requests
> > per month. A shared system will quickly burn though its 'quota'
>
> > ... and Google would notice pretty quickly, and almost certainly look
> > unfavorably on the 'abuse' of the system.
>
On Nov 21, 12:57 pm, "Gregory D'alesandre" <gr...@google.com> wrote:
> In order to get a premier account you'll need to go through a corporate
> credit check (due to being billed offline rather than having a credit card
> verified) which means you need to be an incorporated entity. This is
> likely the biggest issue you'll run into as I'm not sure how many people
> are willing to form a new company (including absorbing the liability behind
> it). Having people outside an existing company asking questions through a
> single support account would be consider an abuse. If you are truly
> interested in exploring this (as in you are ready to incorporate) let me
> know and I can work with the legal team to determine if we see any issue
> with it.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Andrius A <andriu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hosting applications under premier account for are big community would not
> > work, as it would be difficult to calculate the usage separtly, but I am
> > thinking more about getting various issues resolved and questions answered.
> > we could have a small organization and use premier account for education
> > and testing our apps and limit it to 20-30 members? so we could all have a
> > copy of our application running and use it for support?
>
> > On 21 November 2011 17:16, Barry Hunter <barrybhun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I dont see how its going to work. Everyones apps would need to be
> >> under the same 'Google Apps Account'
>
> >> There can only be two 'contacts'. So few people would have to be the
> >> point of contact for all requests - another bottleneck/SPOF into the
> >> 'system'
>
> >> All billing for all the apps would go to one person (by invoice). Who
> >> would then have to collect payment from all the partipating
> >> developers.
>
> >> Pretty sure somewhere that there is a limit ot the number of requests
> >> per month. A shared system will quickly burn though its 'quota'
>
> >> ... and Google would notice pretty quickly, and almost certainly look
> >> unfavorably on the 'abuse' of the system.
>
Thank you Greg for commenting. Actually in previous reply user zdravko better than me explained the problem we all are having. Do you think you could talk with your other teams and advocates and come back with the solution to support little guys?
I will still think about about forming a company/organization.
Yes. GAE even free support is 1Billion with a B times better than say Adsense. Even than adwords. Adsense still owes clients about 50k and they respond only by email only once every 5 days, and they keep changing when they will pay. But for the inconvenience in a month from now they will pay 5% more than the amount they can’t determine they owe. If you can’t get support on $50k something is wrong.
GAE you can get support of Free. That’s a huge improvement.
Now in 3 years when the product is in sustainability and all our friends in the group have moved on… It will likely go back to the way it is with all the other products. So enjoy it while it lasts, and quit complaining or those team members will put it in sustainability and move on to something more fun like Google Dots, or Google Cars, or Google teleportation.
Based on the 99.5% reliability I’m not buying Google Cars or Teleportation just for the record…. I need to not die less than 5 out of 1000 trips to the store.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/b900Uc-vO7gJ.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/b900Uc-vO7gJ.
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Yoav Amit <amit.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> +1 regarding Andrius's questions.
>
> >> Amazing that you guys have gotten so much used to the bad relations of
> >> other Google products, that even the slightest improvement means the world
> >> to you (and yes, kudos to the GAE for the improvement).
>
> >> Other services and companies have a formal email address you can send
> >> emails to and receive an appropriate answer. Not an informal forum who's
> >> support is given "by favor". And no, it's not for free - it's for
> >> approximately the same price we pay as a standard paying GAE customer.
> >> Funny we've gotten to a point where support is something we need to beg (or
> >> pay an noncompetitive price) for.
>
> >> Just to note, during GDD I've asked some senior Google representatives
> >> about this - All agree that Google is way behind other companies in client
> >> support and relations.
>
> >> - Yoav.
>
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Andrius A <andriu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I posted around 5 emails, some are few weeks old and it appears I am
> >>> very unluky because Google didn't reply.
>
> >>> This mail group is not a support, you were really really lucky to get
> >>> the response, I wonder what happens next time you have a problem.. you will
> >>> be ringing bells
>
Greg,before giving any visions, can you please answer the following questions:1) Honestly, how confident your team is with current GAE release? 100%?
2) Do you/your team think/know that there is issue with providing support to dev community?
3) From scale 1 (less important) to 10 (most important) how important for your company is to support us as dev community?
4) Do you have full time dedicated people working to support us, reading these mail groups? If so, how many people?
5) Do you have any plans to increase/dedicate more people to support the community?
6) Did you try to determine how many disappointed developers do you have with the service you provide? If so, did you try to find out the reasons?
7) Do you measurethe production issues left unanswered (per week, month)?
8) Do you have any procedures you tell to your developers how to assist us? If so, can we know the key ones?
9) Do you have someone senior monitoring our emails and your support members answers to mail groups/forums?
Thanks for the explanation. I understand that users who do not pay
should not expect support. That's fair.
But I am in a kind of gray area between freeloaders and premier
customers. I am building a large app and expect to pay big bucks in
the future. Unfortunately I'm still in development mode and haven't
gone over my quota so I am technically a freeloader. But I need some
support before I launch my business app. I think the reason for the
free quota was to encourage folks to build apps that eventually pay.
But it is hard to ramp up to that level without support.
On Nov 23, 4:26 pm, "Gregory D'alesandre" <gr...@google.com> wrote:
> We also created premier accounts for developers who
> need to get answers and are willing to pay what it would cost us to have
> people ready, willing, and able to answer their questions quickly.
Maybe you could have a *middle tier* of support. I'm not yet ready to
spend $500/month for premier service. I don't need emergency response
by phone. But I would happily spend $100/month to be on a forum that
gets a response within a day. For example, I am currently unable to
create new apps because of what I think is a corrupted GAE account.
The documented techniques for creating apps work for others but not
for me. So I can't migrate to HDR. I'm stuck and my only option is to
pay $500/month. Ouch.
Having a support option somewhere between "all" or "nothing" would be
great.
BTW, I love GAE and GWT. They rock!
Thanks,
Phil Burk
What I mean by that. The GAE team has helped me out when I needed an
understanding of how something works behind scenes to predict scalablility.
These were Non-Emergency services that were provided via the forum. They
have also provided best practices support and other "Dev support".
Premier support I believe is supposed to be for some of the things that I
really wished could have gone faster... But I wasn't willing to pay for.
Hey I just blew up my billing and my client is on national TV in 3 hours can
I move the slider so that I don't hit a quota limit in 4 hours. Or, Hey my
index seems stuck can you Vacuum it for me. Or Hey Apps For domains is
sending all of my traffic to an app other than the one I deployed even
though it worked two days ago and they claim it's your problem not theirs.
If you don't have an app then you don't really have "Support" issues. You
have "Dev issues". I don't think even with Nick and Greg and Ikai being
great guys that they are going to write your code for you.
Not being in the $500 a month program I don't know if you can call them up
and say "Hey guys explain to me the risk reward of moving to Web App2 if I'm
currently on WebApp 1 and don't need the "Extras" should I move because I
might want them someday, or should I stay because WebApp is so well tested
and App2 is kind of new and I don't trust you. But I'm very sure you
can't call them up and say "I have this query it takes 55 seconds to execute
and costs me $3 every time I do so can you re-write it for me so that it
doesn't cost so much"
That isn't to say that $500 is not an amazing deal to be able to call
somebody... Just realize that the support number I have for just about
everywhere really does the same thing that the email support does, but I get
to look my client in the eye and say. I was on the phone with Tier 2 support
they say things will suck less in 6 hours. Had I waited patiently via email
I would also have them suck less in 6 hours. Where you will make up the
$500 is for things like that "my client is going on national TV" so that you
know that if you need resources or changes there is someone to make sure
they are available and go smoothly.
Brandon Wirtz
BlackWaterOps: President / Lead Mercenary
Work: 510-992-6548
Toll Free: 866-400-4536
IM: dra...@gmail.com (Google Talk)
Skype: drakegreene
BlackWater Ops
-----Original Message-----
From: google-a...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-a...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of philburk
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Google App Engine
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: Who wants to be in a group (organization) to
open a GAE Premier account?
Hello Greg,
Thanks,
Phil Burk
--
On Nov 23, 5:33 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" <drak...@digerat.com> wrote:
> I think you are looking at support the wrong way. Google/Greg can correct
> me if I'm wrong... but The $500 a month is to get support for GAE "ISSUES"
> not "Development Issues".
Just because I am in the development phase does not mean I can't have
"GAE ISSUES". It turned out there was a problem with some internal
setting in my account that prevented me from creating new
applications. Ikai Lan just did some behind the scenes magic a few
minutes ago and fixed the problem. This was not a development issue.
No one outside Google could have helped me. Luckily Ikai took pity on
this freeloader and solved the problem, for which I am eternally
grateful.
> If you don't have an app then you don't really have "Support" issues. You
> have "Dev issues".
I have 2 apps that I am developing. I needed to migrate to HDR by
creating a third app. But that was broken so I had a "GAE Support"
issue.
> I don't think even with Nick and Greg and Ikai being
> great guys that they are going to write your code for you.
Of course not. I would never expect that. I prefer to RTFM when I have
development questions.
Thanks Ikai for fixing that problem in my GAE account. I don't know
what you did but I am back in business.
Phil
ANY Who....
Being a Microsoft Alumni... I like the buy 4 support tickets they are good
for a year pricing model. And the MVP thanks for being a great member of the
community here are 4 more support tickets model. We used this quite
effectively to keep the communities active and to be able to look customers
square in the eye and say "if you call this number someone will answer 24/7"
even when the answer took 5 business days to arrive :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: google-a...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-a...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of philburk
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 5:54 PM
To: Google App Engine
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: Who wants to be in a group (organization) to
open a GAE Premier account?
Phil
--