topic. Google has apparently set aside some time for this effort.
On Nov 20, 7:34 pm, Andy Smith <
andys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've started working on (or at least at this point only arguing with django
> people) this project as well, but it is still some time off so I wouldn't
> hold your breath quite yet.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM, sserrano <
sebastian.serr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > While it is a difficult task there is people trying to work around
> > it.
>
> > excellent work
>
> > Cheers, Sebastian Serrano
>
> >
http://www.sserrano.com
>
> > On 18 nov, 09:54, frankabel <
frank.abel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > I'm newbie in this App Engine. As far I know, lot of Django app
> > > portability get solved if someone implement a Django database backend
> > > for App Engine. Even I read "Once queryset-refactor lands in trunk, it
> > > might also be possible to write a database backend for App Engine that
> > > would allow any app to run properly. " athttp://
> >
martyalchin.com/2008/apr/8/appengine/
>
> > > Somebody can explain me why isn't implemented yet such database
> > > backend? I, mean is a big deal? What are the main problems that ones
> > > must address to write such backend? If the backend exist, porting
> > > Django app will be more easy that using Google App Engine Helper for
> > > Django?
>
> > > Cheers
> > > Frank Abel
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
google-a...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to