You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
Pretty much. And we check robots before, so that slows things down. But
this is not user facing, This is a background process that happens in
response to user actions.
Igor Kharin
unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 4:41:15 PM1/14/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
Not much? With crawler I'd rather "fan in" in MapReduce Framework's
MutationPool style. It's a waste of instance time to make whole thread
wait for just a single website.
Jason Collins
unread,
Jan 24, 2013, 12:47:50 PM1/24/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
We are doing a data migration between apps (moving our services layer (and data) to a different app than our user-facing app).
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to google-a...@googlegroups.com
Probably worth mentioning that on the way up that slope, we still encountered a number of 10-s "we can't get an instance for you" errors - around 4% of the requests failed like this. Our instances were set to 3-Auto and our latency was set to Auto-1s; I was really hoping that the scheduler would keep up with these settings, but it appears not.