Wp8 App Crashed for Out of memory!

[Mine KANDİL]

I am use admob for wp8, i have 2 banner and 1 InterstitialAd unit on same page, app use much memory(about 100mb for start), when i navigate other page and turn back app gettin slower and crash for out of memory:S please help me.
Check this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt_XABGyDaE

I am use latest sdk,6.5.13.
My ad unit codes:

public MainPage()
        {
            InitializeComponent();
            tamekranreklam();            
        }
        public void tamekranreklam()
        {

            interstitialAd = new InterstitialAd("ca-app-pub-955142777*****/******1813");
            AdRequest adRequest = new AdRequest();
            interstitialAd.ReceivedAd += OnAdReceived;
            interstitialAd.ReceivedAd += interstitialAd_ReceivedAd;
            interstitialAd.FailedToReceiveAd += interstitialAd_FailedToReceiveAd;
            interstitialAd.DismissingOverlay += interstitialAd_DismissingOverlay;
            interstitialAd.LoadAd(adRequest);          
           
        }
void interstitialAd_DismissingOverlay(object sender, AdEventArgs e)
        {
            Debug.WriteLine("Dismissing interstitial.");
        }
        void interstitialAd_FailedToReceiveAd(object sender, AdErrorEventArgs e)
        {
            Debug.WriteLine("Failed to receive interstitial with error " + e.ErrorCode);
        }

        void interstitialAd_ReceivedAd(object sender, AdEventArgs e)
        {
            System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Ad received successfully");
            interstitialAd.ShowAd();
        }
private void OnAdReceived(object sender, AdEventArgs e)
        {            
            System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Ad received successfully");            
        }
 private void OnFailedToReceiveAd(object sender, AdErrorEventArgs errorCode)
        {
            Debug.WriteLine("Failed to receive ad with error " + errorCode.ErrorCode);
        }

 private void PanoramaItem_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
        {
AdView haberreklam = new AdView
                {
                    Format = AdFormats.Banner,
                    AdUnitID = "ca-app-pub-******70579242/*****6619"
                };
                AdView sinemareklam = new AdView
                {
                    Format = AdFormats.Banner,
                    AdUnitID = "ca-app-pub-*******70579242/*****9816"
                };
                haberreklam.ReceivedAd += OnAdReceived;
                haberreklam.FailedToReceiveAd += OnFailedToReceiveAd;
//habergrd is gridname
                habergrd.Children.Add(haberreklam);
                haberreklam.Margin = new Thickness(0, 255, 0, 0);
                haberreklam.VerticalAlignment = VerticalAlignment.Top;
                AdRequest haberreklamreq = new AdRequest();
               
                haberreklam.LoadAd(haberreklamreq);                
                sinemareklam.ReceivedAd += OnAdReceived;
                sinemareklam.FailedToReceiveAd += OnFailedToReceiveAd;
//sinemagrd is gridname
                sinemagr.Children.Add(sinemareklam);
                sinemareklam.Margin = new Thickness(0, 260, -60, 0);
                sinemareklam.VerticalAlignment = VerticalAlignment.Top;
                AdRequest sinemareklamreq = new AdRequest();
                sinemareklam.LoadAd(sinemareklamreq);

        }
 

[Jacek]

Same here. Version 6.5.13.0 is leaking :/ I am getting memory leak (+20mb) every page load with the Ad. 

I tried XAML and code-behind init and both are causing problems. So far I still don't know how to hack it.

[Kak]

same problem here, too.

As banners are progressively degrading my game's performance every new ad is shown, I tried to use intersticials, just to find that they're as bad as banners.

It's so bad that sometimes I think there's no way google could release such terrible code without even testing, so so bad and without updating it that maybe they're doing that on purpose. But then I say... nah! Just your imagination :)


El dimarts 30 de setembre de 2014 9:22:13 UTC+2, Jacek va escriure: