We continue to get issues against the deprecated repositories, but
there is a feature (newish I think; Vladimir has used it on some of his
personal repos) to archive the repo[1]. This appears to be reversible
according to that page, but we get the following:
> When a repository is archived, its issues, pull requests, code,
> labels, milestones, projects, wiki, releases, commits, tags,
> branches, reactions, and comments become read-only. To make changes
> in an archived repository, you must unarchive the repository first.
So, I' propose that we add text to the repos' README saying that
outstanding issues should be moved to gonum/gonum or gonum/netlib if
comments are wanted to be made (just opening a new issue at the
destination linking to the existing issue saying that it is a
continuation of the old).
Does this sound reasonable?
[1]
https://help.github.com/articles/about-archiving-repositories/