Printshop Mail Full Version Free 13l
Major Rowley
We have been using Printshop Mail for over 8 years without issues as you describe, however we are using 7.1 and have not upgraded to the 7.2 version. Our use of Printshop mail is primarily for envelope addressing and numbering. We have 2 Imagepress 7010 and a 1110p Black and white, we just install an Canon 800 and I have tried to use Printshop Mail for a simple NCR numbering job and ran into issues for the first time. In this case the first set printed fine but after that it would number only the second sheet leading me to believe there may be some issue with the rip on the 800. We however are using the less powerful G100 rip.
Thanks for your response and update on Print Shop Mail. I have been thinking about InDesign, (and had a call this morning from a mailing software company who stated that he had a huge number of clients that use InDesign for VD). Adobe's suite might be the way to go, even PhotoShop's VD will work. I think this would be a much better choice than PSM.
PROBLEM ONE: When trying to print an 8-page color newsletter, self cover, the PSM Tech support finally suggested sending one newsletter at a time to eliminate the ending error when printing 840 newsletters after processing for more than 2.5 hours, several times.
I had been convinced that the PSM software was the win-all for VD and that it would process the images only once to the printer which would speed the printing. I have tried every selection...this does not work properly. This month we decided to split the job into 4-groups of 200, however, it still took over 30 minutes to process each group before printing.
PROBLEM TWO: On 4-up postcards, 6" x 8", PSM would not print the ("standard" only choice or Japanese) trim or register marks, (and yes tech support logged onto our computer trying many times without success, finally asked us to upload the file to him. Later he emailed that he was able to do this on his system). Without trim marks it is quite difficult to determine the bleed, trim, and back up position. We finally after hours of trying, decided to print 4-up on the Canon800 (with trim marks) then cutting to size and addressing on our Buskro. This is not what we had in mind as a professional print company. I personally tried again yesterday...no luck.
Thanks to EPICOMM for getting the word out and assistance. Our industry has had enough of the software problems that don't work. Staff becomes very sad, as does management with wasted hours with software that does not meet it's obligation.
We have been using PrintShop Mail for about 10 years. It has been stable and not difficult to use. A few years ago we tested Fusion and another program and decided that PrintShop Mail is the superior program. We also use Windows 7.
We have been using Printshop Mail since 2006. It was sold to us by Konica Minolta with our first C6500. When we were sold the package we were told it was MAC friendly, it is not. I agree the software is clunky on PC's and the manual is difficult to understand. When we paid for phone support other than the delay in getting a return call I found them helpful. We still use Printshop mail for variable data text products with up to 5 or 6 fields varying within the body of text successfully. If your trying to do variable text and images at the same time we found that to be extremely slow, we have done it but not at a profitable production rate. We would break the jobs up into smaller qty's and co-mingle them in the mail trays later.
We have had other plug in's to indesign demonstrated for us but have not made the decision which to purchase. We think the MAC platform would be a better to layout variable data jobs especially if images are varying.
I am having the exact same problem. Using LibreOffice 5.0.2.2 running on Ubuntu 15.10. The mail merge is an all-LibreOffice operation - ODT for the main document, ODS for the spreadsheet containing the data, ODB for the connection database. This worked perfectly the last time I did this using the same files (except for 2 new records added for a total of 187). It works correctly when printing - just not with PDF. Every file contains data from the first record in the spreadsheet.
I have the exact same problem to. Using LibreOffice 5.0.3.2 on Windows 10. The PDF documents have different names from the database (116 names), but when opened the documents are identical. I will try to upgrade - see if that helps. When merging to individual ODT documents everything works fine.
Please Libre Office Team!
Same problem here. - I have for two years used this function - Printing a mailmerge document with fields from my database. It works fine when printing on paper, but on choosing file - Individual files as Output I only get the first record in my Query - and not the chosen post. This applies weather I choose ODT, Word or pdf files.
I tried installing an other version of the Libre Office package and different country versions; but only to get the same result.
This might ha
Ok here is my issue. I am using word 365 on my Mac. I have successfully been able to print labels. the issue is when I go to individually edit my MM document letters, only every other one is printed to the merged documents. In the merge preview I see all of the merged records correctly. Yes the section Breaks are there. I have tried to replace them with page breaks. But when I go and merge all of the documents only the odd pages are printed. I would prefer to not to do this using my parallels and doing this only in Word 365 for Microsoft. Word to the wise, no pun intended, it does work in there but I would like to know if there is an answer for this in the Mac Version????
I'm a WordPerfect user and had to convert documents and data into Word and Excel. The conversion was easier than I feared. Everything looked fine until we tried to print pages from the middle. Thanks again for your help.
Each record in a mail merge creates a separate Word Section when you merge to a document. Page numbering will restart at the beginning of each of these sections. If you have no section breaks in the main document, those will be the only section breaks in the document and the solution of replacing section breaks (^b) with page breaks (^m) will work fine.
7fc3f7cf58