--
_______________________________________________
Golden-Cheetah-Users mailing list
golden-che...@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-cheetah-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golden-cheetah-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golden-cheetah-u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golden-cheetah-users/17067fd7-1e74-4799-9f8e-38d1a3bfea55n%40googlegroups.com.
I managed to pair and it is detected as an ant+ runpod. Which telemetry should reflect run speed and run cadence?
I did some modifications in my GC fork to get what you are proposing. Moreover, my treadmill does not use ANT+ but only BT, so I needed some piece acting as a bridge to the ant+ device used by GC.In the end, I found QZ Domyos, that acts as a bridge between the treadmill and training software. QZ Domyos can send through ANT+ data received from BT treadmill. It sends speed.I had to modify some lines of the code addressed by Ale, because neither cadence nor speed message received from QZ was correctly understood. Maybe it can help you. Previously, I deactivated simulated speed in case of a footpod device.These are the commits with the changes:
Sure, I am arranging two independent PRs, as I understand from you that is a better option.Regarding speed calculation, I was not sure it was the general device behaviour, and even I do not understand very well the implications in the change, ignoring cadence, stride length,... It worked for me, but as a ad hoc change; that's why I did never requested this change. But, following your comment, I have tried to fit the changes, and speed is read from ant+ in case stride length is configured for the device, and cadence is present.I hope it is ok, but, sorry, I cannot test with any real footpod.