On 03/23/2015 07:49 PM,
danm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I echo this point. Why can't string be assigned to nil? Should I just
> get used to using []byte? It just seems way to common to have a nullable
> string field and way to cumbersome to have use a struct with an extra
> bool every time I want a basic string. Has this changed since posting?
>
>
>
> On Friday, April 4, 2014 at 11:48:46 AM UTC-5,
sati...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> But why is this designed this way? I am very new to go and I believe
> there is a "nil" in go. Why isn't a NULL value from the database
> simply mapped to nil? It seems too cumbersome to deal with something
> as simple as a nil. Database admins prefer NULL over empty strings
> because they say it reduces the size of the database overall.
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:28:37 AM UTC-8, aiee wrote:
>
> chris, Julien and Tor, thank you for the hint.
>
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 13:41, Tor Langballe wrote:
> > Note that if you need to SELECT timestamps, use the NullTime
> provided in
> > the source in