Traditional line-oriented internet protocols

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Conrad Meyer

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 4:08:08 AM3/11/10
to golan...@googlegroups.com
Hi list,

Is anyone working on these things for the standard libraries (RFC822, SMTP,
POP3, IMAP come to mind)? (I'm sort of assuming the goal is to have a fairly
"batteries-included" stdlib -- correct me if I'm wrong.)

Thanks,
--
Conrad Meyer <cem...@cs.washington.edu>

Andrea Fazzi

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 4:21:47 AM3/11/10
to golan...@googlegroups.com
2010/3/11 Conrad Meyer <cem...@cs.washington.edu>:

> Hi list,
>
> Is anyone working on these things for the standard libraries (RFC822, SMTP,
> POP3, IMAP come to mind)? (I'm sort of assuming the goal is to have a fairly
> "batteries-included" stdlib -- correct me if I'm wrong.)

I'm investigating the possibility to implement an IMAP4 client but I'd
like to know the intentions of the Go's core team about that.

Cheers,
Andrea

Russ Cox

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 11:14:31 AM3/11/10
to Conrad Meyer, golan...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:08, Conrad Meyer <cem...@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
> Is anyone working on these things for the standard libraries (RFC822, SMTP,
> POP3, IMAP come to mind)? (I'm sort of assuming the goal is to have a fairly
> "batteries-included" stdlib -- correct me if I'm wrong.)

No one here at Google is working on these, but I'd certainly
like to have them. I think for all four the most interesting part
is what the API looks like. Please post proposals here so
that we can discuss the API before there's too much implementation.

Russ

Conrad Meyer

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 2:28:35 PM3/11/10
to golan...@googlegroups.com

Hi,

Absolutely. If/when I have some time for this I'll post proposals to the list.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages