support for type parameters (ie, generics) >> are >> now enabled without requiring the use of build flags. To revert to the >> old >> type checker, you can

implement a type-checker for the design draft. In particular, it allows no conclusion about a) whether it's also possible to make it into a full implementation (ie producing runnable

a valid type-name. It's also not valid because you have two Print-functions of course. > > But I assume that was kind of your point, that without knowing how Print/int is defined

the contracts design draft that we have presented at GopherCon 2018 in Denver. See https://golang.org/cl/149638 . This CL may be cherry-picked on top of current tip to build/install

loads, type-checks and analyzes all the packages in parallel. This >>> > takes 10s real, 60s user per OS/ARCH. >>> > >>> > This would unfortunately

the contracts design draft that we have presented at GopherCon 2018 in Denver. See https://golang.org/cl/149638 . This CL may be cherry-picked on top of current tip to build/install

that the type checker and related components are moving into the main > repository from x/tools, it's time to consider the correct way to build, > install, and deploy vet

about statically type-checking programs. The fact that it can evaluate expressions is incidental: The Go type system requires that the values of constant expressions (as defined

Reviewers: golang-dev1, Message: Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com, I'd like you to review this

in the design of Go we tried to focus on solutions to _these_ problems. As a simple, self-contained example, consider the representation of program structure. -Some observers objected

the primary design goal of all these packages. The goal for the parser was to reject anything that is not syntactically correct. > > Consider this program: > > package main