* Ian Lance Taylor:
I think the Linux Foundation statement is more precise here:
| [T]he good news is open source technologies that are published and
| made publicly available to the world are not subject to the EAR.
It's not just about open source (i.e., licensing), but also the
development and distribution model. As far as I know, the expert
consensus is that the relative clause is really important in that
sentence.
Go forks which are not available to the general public may be covered by
different rules, irrespective of their licensing conditions. The same
applies to products built with the Go toolchain (forked or not).
I agree that further statements make things only more confusing.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH,
https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill